Literature DB >> 27197264

Stromal-Based Signatures for the Classification of Gastric Cancer.

Mark T Uhlik1, Jiangang Liu1, Beverly L Falcon1, Seema Iyer2, Julie Stewart1, Hilal Celikkaya2, Marguerita O'Mahony2, Christopher Sevinsky3, Christina Lowes3, Larry Douglass4, Cynthia Jeffries1, Diane Bodenmiller1, Sudhakar Chintharlapalli1, Anthony Fischl1, Damien Gerald2, Qi Xue2, Jee-Yun Lee5, Alberto Santamaria-Pang3, Yousef Al-Kofahi3, Yunxia Sui3, Keyur Desai3, Thompson Doman1, Amit Aggarwal1, Julia H Carter4, Bronislaw Pytowski2, Shou-Ching Jaminet6, Fiona Ginty3, Aejaz Nasir1, Janice A Nagy6, Harold F Dvorak6, Laura E Benjamin7.   

Abstract

Treatment of metastatic gastric cancer typically involves chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting HER2 (ERBB2) and VEGFR2 (KDR). However, reliable methods to identify patients who would benefit most from a combination of treatment modalities targeting the tumor stroma, including new immunotherapy approaches, are still lacking. Therefore, we integrated a mouse model of stromal activation and gastric cancer genomic information to identify gene expression signatures that may inform treatment strategies. We generated a mouse model in which VEGF-A is expressed via adenovirus, enabling a stromal response marked by immune infiltration and angiogenesis at the injection site, and identified distinct stromal gene expression signatures. With these data, we designed multiplexed IHC assays that were applied to human primary gastric tumors and classified each tumor to a dominant stromal phenotype representative of the vascular and immune diversity found in gastric cancer. We also refined the stromal gene signatures and explored their relation to the dominant patient phenotypes identified by recent large-scale studies of gastric cancer genomics (The Cancer Genome Atlas and Asian Cancer Research Group), revealing four distinct stromal phenotypes. Collectively, these findings suggest that a genomics-based systems approach focused on the tumor stroma can be used to discover putative predictive biomarkers of treatment response, especially to antiangiogenesis agents and immunotherapy, thus offering an opportunity to improve patient stratification. Cancer Res; 76(9); 2573-86. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27197264     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  14 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the role of molecular biomarkers as a potential weapon against gastric cancer: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Marwa Matboli; Sarah El-Nakeep; Nourhan Hossam; Alaa Habieb; Ahmed E M Azazy; Ali E Ebrahim; Ziad Nagy; Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Natural killer cell and stroma abundance are independently prognostic and predict gastric cancer chemotherapy benefit.

Authors:  Bailiang Li; Yuming Jiang; Guoxin Li; George A Fisher; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-05-07

Review 3.  Gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of current and future treatment strategies.

Authors:  Rachel E Sexton; Mohammed Najeeb Al Hallak; Maria Diab; Asfar S Azmi
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Molecular dissection of CRC primary tumors and their matched liver metastases reveals critical role of immune microenvironment, EMT and angiogenesis in cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Yong Beom Cho; Hye Kyung Hong; Song Wu; Philip J Ebert; Steven M Bray; Swee Seong Wong; Jason C Ting; John N Calley; Catherine F Whittington; Shripad V Bhagwat; Christoph Reinhard; Robert Wild; Do-Hyun Nam; Amit Aggarwal; Woo Yong Lee; Sheng-Bin Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Risk factors predisposing to cardia gastric adenocarcinoma: Insights and new perspectives.

Authors:  Esmat Abdi; Saeid Latifi-Navid; Saber Zahri; Abbas Yazdanbod; Farhad Pourfarzi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  Targeted therapies in metastatic gastric cancer: Current knowledge and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Pellino; Erika Riello; Floriana Nappo; Stefano Brignola; Sabina Murgioni; Selma Ahcene Djaballah; Sara Lonardi; Vittorina Zagonel; Massimo Rugge; Fotios Loupakis; Matteo Fassan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Molecular classifications of gastric cancers: Novel insights and possible future applications.

Authors:  Silvio Ken Garattini; Debora Basile; Monica Cattaneo; Valentina Fanotto; Elena Ongaro; Marta Bonotto; Francesca V Negri; Rosa Berenato; Paola Ermacora; Giovanni Gerardo Cardellino; Mariella Giovannoni; Nicoletta Pella; Mario Scartozzi; Lorenzo Antonuzzo; Nicola Silvestris; Gianpiero Fasola; Giuseppe Aprile
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-05-15

8.  Genomic characterization of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Steven M Bray; Jeeyun Lee; Seung Tae Kim; Joon Young Hur; Philip J Ebert; John N Calley; Isabella H Wulur; Thejaswini Gopalappa; Swee Seong Wong; Hui-Rong Qian; Jason C Ting; Jiangang Liu; Melinda D Willard; Ruslan D Novosiadly; Young Suk Park; Joon Oh Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang; Amit Aggarwal; Hee Cheol Kim; Christoph Reinhard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Dissection of gastric cancer heterogeneity for precision oncology.

Authors:  Shamaine Wei Ting Ho; Patrick Tan
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  Systematic Elucidation of the Mechanism of Quercetin against Gastric Cancer via Network Pharmacology Approach.

Authors:  Liangjun Yang; Zhipeng Hu; Jiajie Zhu; Qiting Liang; Hengli Zhou; Jiali Li; Xiangzhen Fan; Ziming Zhao; Huafeng Pan; Baoying Fei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.