Literature DB >> 27196769

Cell-Cycle Gene Alterations in 4,864 Tumors Analyzed by Next-Generation Sequencing: Implications for Targeted Therapeutics.

Teresa Helsten1, Shumei Kato2, Maria Schwaederle1, Brett N Tomson3, Timon P H Buys3, Sheryl K Elkin3, Jennifer L Carter3, Razelle Kurzrock1.   

Abstract

Alterations in the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-retinoblastoma (RB) machinery disrupt cell-cycle regulation and are being targeted in drug development. To understand the cancer types impacted by this pathway, we analyzed frequency of abnormalities in key cell-cycle genes across 4,864 tumors using next-generation sequencing (182 or 236 genes; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments laboratory). Aberrations in the cell-cycle pathway were identified in 39% of cancers, making this pathway one of the most commonly altered in cancer. The frequency of aberrations was as follows: CDKN2A/B (20.1% of all patients), RB1 (7.6%), CCND1 (6.1%), CCNE1 (3.6%), CDK4 (3.2%), CCND3 (1.8%), CCND2 (1.7%), and CDK6 (1.7%). Rates and types of aberrant cell-cycle pathway genes differed between cancer types and within histologies. Analysis of coexisting and mutually exclusive genetic aberrations showed that CCND1, CCND2, and CCND3 aberrations were all positively associated with CDK6 aberrations [OR and P values, multivariate analysis: CCND1 and CDK6 (OR = 3.5; P < 0.0001), CCND2 and CDK6 (OR = 4.3; P = 0.003), CCND3 and CDK6 (OR = 3.6; P = 0.007)]. In contrast, RB1 alterations were negatively associated with multiple gene anomalies in the cell-cycle pathway, including CCND1 (OR = 0.25; P = 0.003), CKD4 (OR = 0.10; P = 0.001), and CDKN2A/B (OR = 0.21; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, aberrations in the cell-cycle pathway were very common in diverse cancers (39% of 4,864 neoplasms). The frequencies and types of alterations differed between and within tumor types and will be informative for drug development strategies. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(7); 1682-90. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27196769     DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cyclin D degradation by E3 ligases in cancer progression and treatment.

Authors:  Shuo Qie; J Alan Diehl
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Double Trouble: Concomitant RB1 and BRCA2 Depletion Evokes Aggressive Phenotypes.

Authors:  Amy C Mandigo; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Next Generation Sequencing Reveals Potentially Actionable Alterations in the Majority of Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies.

Authors:  Aaron M Goodman; Michael Choi; Matthew Wieduwilt; Carolyn Mulroney; Caitlin Costello; Garrett Frampton; Vincent Miller; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27

4.  Utility of Genomic Analysis In Circulating Tumor DNA from Patients with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary.

Authors:  Shumei Kato; Nithya Krishnamurthy; Kimberly C Banks; Pradip De; Kirstin Williams; Casey Williams; Brian Leyland-Jones; Scott M Lippman; Richard B Lanman; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Cancer stem cells: Regulation programs, immunological properties and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Dingxiao Zhang; Dean G Tang; Kiera Rycaj
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  Bicistronic transfer of CDKN2A and p53 culminates in collaborative killing of human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Juliana G Xande; Ana P Dias; Rodrigo E Tamura; Mario C Cruz; Bárbara Brito; Robledo A Ferreira; Bryan E Strauss; Eugenia Costanzi-Strauss
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Upregulation of cell cycle genes in head and neck cancer patients may be antagonized by erufosine's down regulation of cell cycle processes in OSCC cells.

Authors:  Shariq S Ansari; Ashwini K Sharma; Michael Zepp; Elizabet Ivanova; Frank Bergmann; Rainer König; Martin R Berger
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-20

8.  Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study.

Authors:  Jason K Sicklick; Shumei Kato; Ryosuke Okamura; Maria Schwaederle; Michael E Hahn; Casey B Williams; Pradip De; Amy Krie; David E Piccioni; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; Adam Benson; Jennifer Webster; Philip J Stephens; J Jack Lee; Paul T Fanta; Scott M Lippman; Brian Leyland-Jones; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Comprehensive genomic profiling of small cell lung cancer in Chinese patients and the implications for therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Yu Wang; Yuan Zhang; Yanfei Yu; Hui Chen; Kuai Liu; Ming Yao; Kai Wang; Weiguang Gu; Tao Shou
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Anticancer Activity in Honeybee Propolis: Functional Insights to the Role of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester and Its Complex With γ-Cyclodextrin.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Ishida; Ran Gao; Navjot Shah; Priyanshu Bhargava; Takahiro Furune; Sunil C Kaul; Keiji Terao; Renu Wadhwa
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.