| Literature DB >> 27195668 |
Shan Yuan1, Linna Ma1, Chengyuan Guo1, Renzhong Wang1.
Abstract
Elucidating the driving factors among-population divergence is an important task in evolutionary biology, however the relative contribution from natural selection and neutral genetic differentiation has been less debated. A manipulation experiment was conducted to examine whether the phenotypic divergence of Leymus chinensis depended on climate variations or genetic differentiations at 18 wild sites along a longitudinal gradient from 114 to 124°E in northeast China and at common garden condition of transplantation. Demographical, morphological and physiological phenotypes of 18 L. chinensis populations exhibited significant divergence along the gradient, but these divergent variations narrowed significantly at the transplantation. Moreover, most of the phenotypes were significantly correlated with mean annual precipitation and temperature in wild sites, suggesting that climatic variables played vital roles in phenotypic divergence of the species. Relative greater heterozygosity (HE), genotype evenness (E) and Shannon-Wiener diversity (I) in western group of populations suggested that genetic differentiation also drove phenotypic divergence of the species. However, neutral genetic differentiation (FST = 0.041) was greatly lower than quantitative differentiation (QST = 0.199), indicating that divergent selection/climate variable was the main factor in determining the phenotypic divergence of the species along the large-scale gradient.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27195668 PMCID: PMC4872539 DOI: 10.1038/srep26288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Sample locations, vegetation types, climate and soil properties.
| Wulantuga | 01 | 44°28.722′ | 124°13.671′ | Meadow | 291 | 472 | 5.1 | 8.5 | 0.20 | 23 |
| Chaganhua | 02 | 44°35.475′ | 124°16.543′ | Meadow | 202 | 467 | 5.1 | 8.5 | 0.20 | 24 |
| Wulanaodu | 03 | 44°35.999′ | 123°48.219′ | Meadow | 152 | 442 | 5.3 | 8.1 | 0.16 | 22 |
| Yaojingzieast | 04 | 44°35.604′ | 123°30.259′ | Meadow | 165 | 433 | 5.4 | 8.4 | 0.23 | 23 |
| Yaojingziwest | 05 | 44°34.413′ | 123°29.887′ | Meadow | 159 | 434 | 5.4 | 7.8 | 0.16 | 17 |
| Taipingchuan | 06 | 44°21.323′ | 123°14.136′ | Meadow | 150 | 428 | 5.6 | 8.6 | 0.13 | 18 |
| Jiamatu | 07 | 44°01.654′ | 122°56.521′ | Meadow | 149 | 422 | 6.0 | 8.2 | 0.17 | 14 |
| Baolongshan | 08 | 43°58.237′ | 122°43.677′ | Meadow | 156 | 415 | 6.0 | 7.9 | 0.13 | 13 |
| Molimiao | 09 | 43°34.277′ | 121°55.444′ | Meadow | 179 | 399 | 6.3 | 8.4 | 0.12 | 12 |
| Shaogen | 10 | 43°38.831′ | 120°47.316′ | Meadow | 270 | 385 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 0.11 | 12 |
| Tianshaneast | 11 | 43°50.442′ | 120°15.015′ | Typical steppe | 413 | 388 | 5.8 | 8.2 | 0.19 | 9 |
| Tianshanwest | 12 | 43°50.277′ | 119°58.587′ | Typical steppe | 513 | 386 | 5.8 | 8.3 | 0.19 | 8 |
| Xingfuzhilu | 13 | 43°42.818′ | 119°03.749′ | Typical steppe | 735 | 386 | 4 | 8.4 | 0.11 | 8 |
| Xinchengzi | 14 | 43°14.175′ | 118°01.237′ | Typical steppe | 919 | 397 | 3.5 | 7.7 | 0.15 | 10 |
| Dalainuori | 15 | 43°16.157′ | 117°09.659′ | Typical steppe | 1309 | 385 | 1.3 | 8.1 | 0.14 | 8 |
| Aqiwula | 16 | 43°33.691′ | 116°40.619′ | Typical steppe | 1239 | 340 | 1.3 | 8.8 | 0.15 | 7 |
| Dabuxiletu | 17 | 43°55.880′ | 115°45.252′ | Desert steppe | 1158 | 276 | 1.4 | 7.8 | 0.10 | 5 |
| Baogedawula | 18 | 43°59.550′ | 114°51.607′ | Desert steppe | 1092 | 237 | 1.7 | 7.7 | 0.12 | 3 |
ELE: elevation, MAP: mean annual precipitation, MAT: mean annual temperature, SWC: soil water content.
Figure 1Vegetative shoot height (a), stem node numbers (b) in wild sites and transplantation and their regressions with mean annual precipitation (MAP) (c,d) in L. chinensis along the large-scale gradient.
Figure 2Physiological phenotypes of relative water content (RWC) (a), proline (b), soluble sugar (c), leaf nitrogen (d), chlorophyll (a + b) (e), and chlorophyll a/b (f) in wild sites and transplantation.
Hierarchical analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) for 18 L. chinensis populations.
| None | All | Among populations within groups | 17 | 0.274 | 7.28** |
| Within populations | 522 | 3.491 | 92.72** | ||
| Clusters | East vs. West | Among groups | 1 | 0.239 | 6.16** |
| Among populations within groups | 16 | 0.149 | 3.85** | ||
| Within populations | 552 | 3.491 | 89.99** | ||
| Vegetation | M–T–D | Among groups | 2 | 0.170 | 4.44** |
| Among populations within groups | 15 | 0.177 | 4.62** | ||
| Within populations | 552 | 3.491 | 90.94** | ||
| Soil pH | Nearly neutral vs. Alkaline | Among groups | 1 | 0.013 | 0.33ns |
| Among populations within groups | 16 | 0.268 | 7.10** | ||
| Within populations | 552 | 3.491 | 92.57** |
M: meadow, T: typical steppe and D: desert steppe, East (01–10 sites), West (11–18 sites), Nearly neutral (7.0 < pH ≤ 8.0), Alkaline (pH > 8.0). **P < 0.01, ns: not significant in each hierarchical analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 4