Dana C Mora1, Thomas A Arcury1,2, Sara A Quandt3,4. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 2. Center for Worker Health, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 3. Center for Worker Health, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. squandt@wakehealth.edu. 4. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. squandt@wakehealth.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Immigrant workers frequently take jobs that are physically demanding, provide low wages, and result in injuries (e.g., poultry production and processing). Through a qualitative approach, this paper elicits poultry workers' evaluations of their jobs and set them in the larger context of their lives. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 65 poultry workers in western North Carolina. Workers were asked to discuss job characteristics, physical and psychological impacts of their employment, and perceived health risks. RESULTS: Immigrant workers valued the stability, benefits, upward mobility, and pay offered. They disliked the physical demands, the potential perceived effects of the job on their health, and the interactions with bosses and peers. CONCLUSIONS: Workers' willingness to endure dirty, dangerous, and demanding (3-D) conditions of poultry must be understood in the context of other employment options, structural violence, and their focus on immediate family needs that positive aspects of these jobs can fulfill. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:877-886, 2016.
OBJECTIVES: Immigrant workers frequently take jobs that are physically demanding, provide low wages, and result in injuries (e.g., poultry production and processing). Through a qualitative approach, this paper elicits poultry workers' evaluations of their jobs and set them in the larger context of their lives. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 65 poultry workers in western North Carolina. Workers were asked to discuss job characteristics, physical and psychological impacts of their employment, and perceived health risks. RESULTS: Immigrant workers valued the stability, benefits, upward mobility, and pay offered. They disliked the physical demands, the potential perceived effects of the job on their health, and the interactions with bosses and peers. CONCLUSIONS: Workers' willingness to endure dirty, dangerous, and demanding (3-D) conditions of poultry must be understood in the context of other employment options, structural violence, and their focus on immediate family needs that positive aspects of these jobs can fulfill. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:877-886, 2016.
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Heather O'Hara; Joseph G Grzywacz; Scott Isom; Haiying Chen; Sara A Quandt Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sara A Quandt; Joseph G Grzywacz; Antonio Marín; Lourdes Carrillo; Michael L Coates; Bless Burke; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Sara A Quandt; Alice E Arcury-Quandt; Emma J Lawlor; Lourdes Carrillo; Antonio J Marín; Joseph G Grzywacz; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Rita Pichardo-Geisinger; Diana Muñoz-Ali; Thomas A Arcury; Jill N Blocker; Joseph G Grzywacz; Dana C Mora; Haiying Chen; Mark R Schulz; Steve R Feldman; Sara A Quandt Journal: Int J Dermatol Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 2.736
Authors: Matthew J Sagransky; Rita O Pichardo-Geisinger; Diana Muñoz-Ali; Steven R Feldman; Dana C Mora; Sara A Quandt Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2012-08
Authors: Sara A Quandt; Taylor J Arnold; Dana C Mora; Joanne C Sandberg; Stephanie S Daniel; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.214