| Literature DB >> 27194921 |
Eun-Young Jung1, Young-Hwa Hwang2, Seon-Tea Joo3.
Abstract
The relationship between chemical compositions, meat quality traits, and palatability attributes in 10 primal cuts from Hanwoo steer carcasses were assessed. Sensory palatability attributes of Hanwoo beef were more closely related with fat content than to moisture or protein content. Among the chemical compositions, only fat had a significant correlation with juiciness (0.67, p<0.001), tenderness (0.32, p<0.05), and overall palatability (0.56, p<0.001). Oleic acid (%) was not significantly related with overall palatability (p>0.05). Overall palatability was negatively correlated with drip loss (-0.32, p<0.05), cooking loss (-0.36, p<0.05), and shear force (-0.54, p<0.01). The correlation between fat content and overall palatability was increased when higher fat cuts (Ansim, Dungsim, Chaekeut, Yangjee, and Kalbi) were analyzed, compared to lower fat cuts (Moksim, Abdari, Udun, Suldo, and Satae). Also, the correlation between shear force and overall palatability was decreased in lower fat cuts compared to higher fat cuts. Our results suggest that the palatability of Hanwoo beef can be improved by increasing fat content in muscles, as increased fat content leads to an increase in sensory tenderness, flavor, and juiciness.Entities:
Keywords: Hanwoo; beef quality; fat content; palatability; primal cuts
Year: 2016 PMID: 27194921 PMCID: PMC4869539 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.2.145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Correlation coefficients between chemical compositions and sensory panel scores of Hanwoo primal cuts1)
| Flavor | Juiciness | Tenderness | Overall palatability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude moisture (%) | −0.10 | −0.18 | −0.03 | −0.10 |
| Crude protein (%) | 0.19 | −0.12 | −0.06 | −0.11 |
| Crude fat (%) | 0.45** | 0.67*** | 0.32* | 0.56*** |
| Crude ash (%) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Oleic acid (C18:1, %) | 0.32* | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.26 |
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
1)10 primal cuts: Ansim; Dungsim; Chaekeut; Moksim; Abdari; Udun; Suldo; Yangjee; Satae; Kalbi.
Correlation coefficients between meat quality traits and sensory panel scores of Hanwoo primal cuts1)
| Flavor | Juiciness | Tenderness | Overall palatability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle pH | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.12 |
| Meat color measurements | ||||
| CIE L* | −0.09 | −0.12 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| CIE a* | 0.18 | 0.17 | −0.22 | 0.16 |
| CIE b* | −0.12 | 0.03 | 0.06 | −0.11 |
| Chroma | 0.13 | 0.17 | −0.14 | 0.25 |
| hue | −0.06 | 0.03 | 0.09 | −0.06 |
| Drip loss (%) | −0.11 | −0.22 | −0.26 | −0.32* |
| Cooking loss (%) | −0.18 | −0.46** | −0.34* | −0.36* |
| Shear force (kg/cm2) | 0.18 | −0.27 | −0.66*** | −0.54** |
| Sarcomere length (um) | −0.05 | −0.02 | 0.27 | 0.22 |
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
1)10 primal cuts: Ansim; Dungsim; Chaekeut; Moksim; Abdari; Udun; Suldo; Yangjee; Satae; Kalbi.
Correlation coefficients between sensory panel scores and crude fat (%) on primal cut basis
| Flavor | Juiciness | Tenderness | Overall palatability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All cuts | 0.45* | 0.67*** | 0.32* | 0.56*** |
| 0.51* | 0.72*** | 0.36* | 0.62*** | |
| 0.53* | 0.68*** | 0.36* | 0.68*** | |
| 0.57** | 0.74*** | 0.42* | 0.72*** | |
| 0.36 | 0.49* | 0.26 | 0.51* | |
| 0.31 | 0.38* | 0.24 | 0.49* | |
| 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 0.45* | |
| 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.16 | 0.44* | |
| 0.46* | 0.58** | 0.25 | 0.57** | |
| 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.32 | |
| 0.58** | 0.72*** | 0.35 | 0.74*** |
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Correlation coefficients between sensory panel scores and shear force (kg/cm2) on primal cut basis
| Flavor | Juiciness | Tenderness | Overall palatability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All cuts | 0.18 | −0.27 | −0.66*** | −0.54** |
| Ansim | 0.23 | −0.22 | −0.75*** | −0.72*** |
| Dungsim | 0.13 | −0.39* | −0.76*** | −0.68*** |
| Chaekeut | 0.17 | −0.34 | −0.72*** | −0.74*** |
| Moksim | 0.06 | −0.12 | −0.46* | −0.48* |
| Abdari | 0.11 | −0.08 | −0.34 | −0.45* |
| Udun | 0.14 | −0.15 | −0.48* | −0.52* |
| Suldo | 0.09 | −0.07 | −0.36 | −0.44* |
| Yangjee | 0.16 | −0.26 | −0.58** | −0.62** |
| Satae | 0.03 | −0.12 | −0.23 | −0.32 |
| Kalbi | 0.18 | −0.35 | −0.55** | −0.58** |
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.