| Literature DB >> 27194597 |
Silvia Gschwendtner1, Tim Mansfeldt2, Susanne Kublik1, Evangelia Touliari1, Franz Buegger3, Michael Schloter1.
Abstract
Cyanides are highly toxic and produced by various microorganisms as defence strategy or to increase their competitiveness. As degradation is the most efficient way of detoxification, some microbes developed the capability to useEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27194597 PMCID: PMC4919992 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
13C incorporation (‰ V‐PDB) into microbial biomass (Cmic) of soil D, F and W derived from microcosms spiked with 13C‐labelled or unlabelled ferrocyanide after 18, 32 and 74 days of incubation (n = 3, sd means standard deviation)
| δ13C Cmic | ‰ V‐PDB | D | F | W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | sd | Mean | sd | Mean | sd | ||
| 12C‐Cyanide | 18d | −26.04 | 0.39 | −26.40 | 3.19 | −26.15 | 1.94 |
| 32d | −28.73 | 1.47 | −30.81 | 0.72 | −28.68 | 1.27 | |
| 74d | −26.52 | 0.30 | −28.16 | 0.28 | −27.28 | 0.20 | |
| 13C‐Cyanide | 18d | 22.78 | 5.71 | 10.98 | 3.45 | −0.88 | 1.33 |
| 32d | 70.48 | 7.63 | 60.58 | 10.97 | 52.83 | 4.14 | |
| 74d | 75.36 | 8.26 | 67.59 | 13.92 | 57.22 | 6.66 | |
Figure 1PCA plot generated from TRFLP fragments based on 16S rRNA gene amplicons from 12 gradient fractions of DNA directly extracted from soil D, F and W obtained from unlabelled (C12) and labelled (C13) microcosms (n = 3).
Figure 2TRFLP fragments showing shifts towards fractions with higher buoyant density in 13C‐labelled microcosms when compared with unlabelled microcosms presented as mean difference between the relative abundance in 13C‐labelled and unlabelled DNA extracts from (A) soil D, (B) soil F and (C) soil W among 12 gradient fractions (n = 3). TRF name refers to TRF length in base pairs.
Figure 3PCA plot generated from partial 16S rRNA gene sequences assigned to phylum level obtained from 6 gradient fractions of DNA directly extracted from soil D, F and W obtained from unlabelled (C12) and labelled (C13) microcosms.
Figure 4Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) showing shifts towards fractions with higher buoyant density in 13C‐labelled microcosms when compared with unlabelled microcosms presented as difference between the relative abundance in 13C‐labelled and unlabelled DNA extracts from (A) soil D, (B) soil F and (C) soil W among 6 gradient fractions. Phylogenetic classification of OTUs is given in Table 2.
List of 13C‐labelled OTUs obtained from soil D, F and W and its phylogenetic classification
| OTU | Phylum | Class | Oder | Family | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU077 | Acidobacteria | Acidobacteria_Gp3 | incertae_sedis | incertae_sedis | Gp3 |
| OTU136 | Acidobacteria | Acidobacteria_Gp4 | incertae_sedis | incertae_sedis | Gp4 |
| OTU020 | Acidobacteria | Acidobacteria_Gp6 | incertae_sedis | incertae_sedis | Gp6 |
| OTU058 | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Acidimicrobiales | Unclassified | Unclassified |
| OTU017 | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Kineosporiaceae |
|
| OTU002 | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Micromonosporaceae | Unclassified |
| OTU006 | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Mycobacteriaceae |
|
| OTU041 | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Pseudonocardiaceae | Unclassified |
| OTU028 | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Unclassified | Unclassified |
| OTU131 | Gemmatimonadetes | Gemmatimonadetes | Gemmatimonadales | Gemmatimonadaceae |
|
| OTU033 | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified |
| OTU102 | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Xanthomonadales | Xanthomonadaceae |
|
| OTU040 | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Xanthomonadales | Xanthomonadaceae | Unclassified |