| Literature DB >> 27193212 |
Jae Jun Lee1, Sang Jin Han2, Hyoung Soo Kim3, Kyung Soon Hong2, Hyun Hee Choi2, Kyu Tae Park2, Jeong Yeol Seo4, Tae Hun Lee4, Heung Cheol Kim5, Seonju Kim1, Sun Hee Lee6, Sung Mi Hwang1, Sang Ook Ha4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a useful treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, little is known about the predictors of survival and neurologic outcome after ECMO. We analyzed our institution's experience with ECMO for refractory OHCA and evaluated the predictors of survival and neurologic outcome after ECMO.Entities:
Keywords: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Neurologic outcome; Oliguria; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Survival rate
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27193212 PMCID: PMC4870801 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-016-0266-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ISSN: 1757-7241 Impact factor: 2.953
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study population and outcome ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; OHCA, out-of-hospital; ECPR, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; VA, venoarterial; VV, venovenous
Comparison of patients’ clinical characteristics between non-survivors and survivors
| All | Non-survivors | Survivors |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age, years | 55 (40, 68) | 57 (46.5, 72.5) | 52 (35.5, 61) | 0.208 |
| Gender, male (%) | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0.229 |
| BMI | 22.8 (21.9, 26.1) | 22.9 (21.2, 28.1) | 22.6 (22.4, 24.1) | 0.648 |
| Past medical history | ||||
| Hypertension | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0.414 |
| Diabetes | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0.414 |
| Previous PCI | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.604 |
| Cerebral vascular accident | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Causes of cardiac arrest | 0.329 | |||
| AMI | 15 | 8 | 7 | |
| Anaphylactic shock | 3 | 3 | - | |
| Arrhythmia | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| Commotio Cordis | 1 | - | 1 | |
| Hypothermia | 1 | - | 1 | |
| AAA rupture | 1 | 1 | - | |
| Pre-ECMO laboratory findings | ||||
| pH | 7.01 (6.80, 7.08) | 6.98 (6.80, 7.13) | 7.02 (6.97, 7.04) | 0.422 |
| PaO2 | 33 (7, 54.5) | 10 (6, 42) | 51 (28, 70) | 0.009a |
| PaCO2 | 69 (55.5, 97.5) | 71 (64.5, 103) | 61 (37.5, 88) | 0.095 |
| CK-MB | 6.1 (2.2, 15.73) | 4.4 (2.0, 24.2) | 6.1 (2.5, 7.6) | 0.976 |
| Troponin-I | 0.17 (0.06, 3.25) | 0.17 (0.07, 6.15) | 0.17 (0.05, 1.03) | 0.522 |
| BUN | 14.5 (11.3, 20.1) | 14.5 (12.1, 21.0) | 16.0 (9.2, 20.5) | 0.927 |
| Creatinine | 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) | 1.3 (0.8, 1.4) | 1.2 (1.1, 1.5) | 0.784 |
| Total bilirubin | 0.78 (0.59, 1.13) | 0.75 (0.57, 1.11) | 0.92 (0.7, 1.21) | 0.410 |
| Lactate | 9.7 (7.7, 13.2) | 10.4 (8.4, 13.9) | 9.0 (6.9, 11.6) | 0.284 |
| Pre-ECMO | ||||
| SOFA score | 14 (13, 16) | 14 (13.5, 16) | 14 (12.8, 15.3) | 0.446 |
| SAPS 2 score | 87 (80, 97) | 90 (83.5, 99.5) | 82.5 (75, 91.3) | 0.077 |
| PCI | 15 (65.2 %) | 9 (69.2 %) | 6 (60 %) | 0.646 |
| IABP | 0.604 | |||
| Pre-ECMO | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| After-ECMO | 2 | 2 | - | |
| CRRT | 18 | 10 | 8 | 1.000 |
BMI body mass index, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, AAA abdominal aortic aneurysm, BUN blood urea nitrogen, SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment, SAPS 2 simplified acute physiology score, IABP intra-aortic balloon pump, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapy, IQR continuous variables expressed median
asignificant difference
Comparison of CPR- and ECMO-related characteristics between non-survivors and survivors
| All | Non-survivors | Survivors |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Locations of victims | 0.472 | |||
| Public | 15 | 10 | 5 | |
| Home | 5 | 2 | 3 | |
| In-ambulance during transportation | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| Other hospital | 1 | - | 1 | |
| Time of collapse to CPR start, min | 1 (1, 5) | 4 (1, 6) | 1 (1, 1.75) | 0.166 |
| Bystander CPR | 14 | 6 | 8 | 0.197 |
| First monitored rhythm | 0.685 | |||
| Shockable | 10 | 5 | 5 | |
| Non-shockable | 13 | 8 | 5 | |
| Transport time from collapse to hospital, min | 22 (15, 38) | 22 (15, 51) | 21 (13, 30) | 0.910 |
| EKG rhythm on arrival at ED | 0.177 | |||
| Vf/VT | 20 | 12 | 8 | |
| PEA | 2 | - | 2 | |
| Asystole | 1 | 1 | - | |
| Collapse to ECMO time, min | 84 (61, 101) | 94 (72.5, 127) | 64.5 (55.25, 89.75) | 0.101 |
| CPR time, min | 62 (53, 86) | 66 (58.5, 108) | 57.5 (40.5, 73.75) | 0.101 |
| ROSC ≥ 20 min during CPR | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Door to ECMO time, min | 55 (41, 67) | 62 (49, 71.5) | 45 (32.5, 56.5) | 0.030a |
| ROSB at ICU arrival | 17 | 10 | 7 | 1.000 |
| Pre-ECMO VIS | 41.0 (16.4, 76.2) | 63.5 (0, 93.8) | 39.6 (31.7, 71.6) | 0.832 |
| Post-ECMO VIS; at 6 h on ICU arrival | 7.6 (0, 22.6) | 11.3 (3.4, 58.4) | 0 (0, 7.8) | 0.030a |
| 24 h urine output (ml · kg−1 · h−1) | 0.92 (0.03, 2.33) | 0.1 (0–0.92) | 2.39 (1.59, 3.86) | <0.001a |
| Pupil diameter on arrival at ED, mm | 6 (6, 7) | 7 (6, 7) | 6 (3.5, 7.25) | 0.414 |
| Pupil reflex positive after ECMO | 15 | 6 | 10 | 0.007a |
| Hypothermia for 24 h | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0.127 |
| ECMO duration, h | 98 (60, 192) | 75 (18.5, 122) | 151 (97.25,219.25) | 0.008a |
| CPC grade | ||||
| 1 | 7 | |||
| 4 | 3 |
VIS (vasoactive inotropic score) = IS + milrinone dose (μg/kg/min) + 10000 × vasopressin dose (unit/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine dose (μg/kg/min), IS (inotropic score) = dopamine dose (μg/kg/min) + dobutamine dose (μg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine dose (μg/kg/min)
CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ED emergency department, Vf ventricular fibrillation, VT ventricular tachycardia, PEA pulseless electrical activity, ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, ROSB return of spontaneous beat, ICU intensive care unit, CPC cerebral performance category, IQR continuous variables expressed median
asignificant difference
Characteristics of brain images
| Brain CT just after ECMO | FU brain image | Outcomes | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death | Survival | |||
|
|
|
| ||
| Hypoxic brain damage (−) | Hypoxic brain damage (−) | - | 3 | 3 |
| Hypoxic brain damage (+) | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| ICH due to hypoxic brain damage | 2 | - | 2 | |
| Hypoxic brain damage (+) | Hypoxic brain damage (+) | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| ICH due to hypoxic brain damage | 2 | - | 2 | |
| Check (−) | Check (−) | 2 | 1 | 3 |
CT computer tomography, ICH intracranial hemorrhage
Comparison of complications between non-survivors and survivors
| All (N-=23) | Non-survivors (N=13) | Survivors (N=10) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPR-related complication | ||||
| Chest wall compartment syndrome | 1 | 1 | - | 1.000 |
| Pneumothorax | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Chylothorax | 1 | - | 1 | 0.435 |
| Pulmonary hemorrhage | 2 | 2 | - | 0.486 |
| Hypoxic brain damage | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0.001a |
| Cannula related complication | ||||
| Cannula site bleeding, ≥ 2 units/d pRBC transfusion | 3 | 3 | - | 0.229 |
| Leg ischemia d/t septic emboli and right common iliac artery obstruction | 2 | - | 2 | 0.178 |
| Acute renal failure | 11 | 6 | 5 | 1.000 |
| Ulcer bleeding | 1 | 1 | - | 1.000 |
| Pneumonia | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0.003a |
| ICH d/t hypoxic brain damage | 4 | 4 | - | 0.104 |
| Sore | 4 | - | 4 | 0.024a |
| Sepsis | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0.618 |
CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation, d day, pRBC packed red blood cell, ICH intracranial hemorrhage
asignificant difference
Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis of predictors for mortality
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI |
| OR | 95 % CI |
| |
| Pre-ECMO PaO2 | 0.946 | 0.901–0.993 | 0.025a | 0.936 | 0.873–1.005 | 0.068 |
| 24 h urine output ≤ 0.5 mL · kg−1 · h−1 | 20.250 | 1.878–218.390 | 0.013a | 32.271 | 1.379–755.282 | 0.031a |
ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
asignificant difference
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier survival curve. All seven patients considered fit for discharge survived
Literature review of results of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and our results
| No. of patients | Survival Rate, n (%) | Neurological Outcome, n (%) | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kagawa et al. 2010 [ | 39 | 30 day | CPC 1–2 | Time interval from collapse to ECLS start, min (IQR); 59(45–65). |
| Le Guen et al. 2011 [ | 42 | 28 day | CPC 1–2 | 24 h survival rate after ECLS (17/42; 40 %). |
| Avalli et al. 2012 [ | 18 | 28 day | GOS ≥ 4 | Survival rate of patients with OHCA (1/18; 5 %) lower than IHCA (11/24; 46 %). |
| Haneya et al. 2012 [ | 26 | Survival discharge | Forty patients (47 %) were successfully weaned and 29 patients (34 %) survived to hospital discharge. | |
| Maekawa et al. 2013 [ | 53 | 3 mon | CPC 1 or 2 at 3mon: 8 (15.1) | Survival rate at 3 months (15/53; 28.3 %) |
| Leick et al. 2013 [ | 28 | 11 (39.3) | No check | Door to ECLS implantation time < 30 min |
| Sakamoto et al. 2014 [ | 260 | 32 (12.3) | ECPR 26 hospitals vs. non-ECPR 20 hospitals | |
| Stub et al. 2014 [ | 9 | Survival discharge | CPC 1 or 2 at discharge | CHEER trial (11 with OHCA, 15 with IHCA) |
| Our results | 23 | 30 day | CPC 1: 7 (30) | Door to ECMO team activation time < 10 min for refractory OHCA. |
n number of patients, CPC cerebral performance category, ECLS extracorporeal life support, GOS glasgow outcome scale, OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, IHCA in-hospital cardiac arrest, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, CT computed tomography