Literature DB >> 8810973

Appropriate use of the Glasgow Coma Scale in intubated patients: a linear regression prediction of the Glasgow verbal score from the Glasgow eye and motor scores.

R Rutledge1, C W Lentz, S Fakhry, J Hunt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been shown to be a valuable tool in assessing the neurologic and physiologic status of critically ill patients. Unfortunately, the GCS requires assessment of the verbal response of the patient and this can be blocked by intubation. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of a regression model based upon the eye and motor components of the GCS to accurately predict the verbal response of the GCS. The primary hypothesis was that the verbal response could be derived from the motor and eye responses of the GCS.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in an intensive care unit computer data base. Patients were divided into training and test data sets. Linear regression was used to derive a model of verbal score from the motor and eye scores of the GCS in the training data set. Correlation between the actual and the predicted verbal scores was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 2,521 GCS assessments were available for analysis. The second order multiple regression model was an accurate predictor of the verbal score (Pearson's Correlation r = 0.9, R2 = 0.8, p = 0.0001) in 1,463 observations in the training data set. Second Order Multiple Regression Model: Estimated GCS Verbal = (2.3976) + [GCS Motor x (-0.9253)] + [GCS Eye x (-0.9214)] + [(GCS Motor)2 x (0.2208)] + [(GCS Eye)2 x (0.2318)] where r = 0.91, R2 = 0.83, and p = 0.0001. The accuracy of this model was confirmed by comparing the predicted verbal score to the actual verbal score in the test data set (n = 736, r = 0.92, R2 = 0.85, p = 0.0001)
CONCLUSIONS: The GCS is a useful tool in the intensive care unit and a critical part of the APACHE II assessment of patient acuity. GCS has been shown to be a useful tool in its own right as a predictor of outcome in the critically ill. Its use is limited with intubation. (See Segatore M, Way C: Heart Lung 21:548, 1992; and Lieh-Lai MW, Theodorou AA, Sarnaik AP, et al: J Pediatr 120:195, 1992.) The present study demonstrates that a relatively simple regression model can use the eye and motor components of the GCS to predict the expected verbal component of the GCS, thus allowing the calculation of the GCS sum score in intubated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8810973     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199609000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  21 in total

1.  Effect of the modified Glasgow Coma Scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified Glasgow Coma Scale score model scores of 13.

Authors:  Jorge Humberto Mena; Alvaro Ignacio Sanchez; Andres M Rubiano; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry; Maria Isabel Gutierrez; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-11

Review 2.  Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems.

Authors:  Joshua Kornbluth; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Florence C M Reith; Ruben Van den Brande; Anneliese Synnot; Russell Gruen; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Severe leukoaraiosis portends a poor outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nils Henninger; Saef Izzy; Raphael Carandang; Wiley Hall; Susanne Muehlschlegel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  The Estimated Verbal GCS Subscore in Intubated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: Is it Really Better?

Authors:  Katarina Cheng; Ribal Bassil; Raphael Carandang; Wiley Hall; Susanne Muehlschlegel
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Glasgow Coma Scale score dominates the association between admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and 30-day mortality in a mixed intensive care unit population.

Authors:  Daniel B Knox; Michael J Lanspa; Cristina M Pratt; Kathryn G Kuttler; Jason P Jones; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  A novel fuzzy-logic inference system for predicting trauma-related mortality: emphasis on the impact of response to resuscitation.

Authors:  Yusuf Alper Kilic; Ali Konan; Kaya Yorganci; Iskender Sayek
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale scores on unplanned intensive care unit readmissions among surgical patients.

Authors:  Tak Kyu Oh; In-Ae Song; Young-Tae Jeon
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

9.  Scoring systems in trauma.

Authors:  R Kingston; S J O'Flanagan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score.

Authors:  Yelena G Bodien; Alice Barra; Nancy R Temkin; Jason Barber; Brandon Foreman; Mary Vassar; Claudia Robertson; Sabrina R Taylor; Amy J Markowitz; Geoffrey T Manley; Joseph T Giacino; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.