| Literature DB >> 27192979 |
Xiaona Wang1, Ping Ye2, Ruihua Cao1, Xu Yang1, Wenkai Xiao1, Yun Zhang1, Yongyi Bai1, Hongmei Wu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have disclosed an independent effect of triglycerides on coronary heart disease despite achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals with statin therapy. Arterial stiffness has been increasingly recognized as a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease and atherosclerotic disease. The association between triglycerides and arterial stiffness is not well characterized. We aimed to determine the relationship between triglycerides and arterial stiffness in a community-based longitudinal sample from Beijing, China.Entities:
Keywords: Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity; Carotid–radial pulse wave velocity; Triglycerides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27192979 PMCID: PMC4870778 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0266-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Baseline characteristics of the subjects
| Variables | All subjects | Carotid-femoral PWV | Carotid-femoral PWV |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ≥12 ( | <12 ( | ||
| Age | 61.30 ± 11.4 | 65.59 ± 9.03 | 54.14 ± 10.11 | <0.001 |
| Male (%) | 601 (41.53) | 270 (47.28) | 331 (37.78) | <0.001 |
| BMI | 25.41 ± 3.32 | 25.41 ± 3.28 | 25.26 ± 4.17 | 0.583 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 128.7 ± 17.7 | 135.38 ± 18.37 | 124.37 ± 15.93 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 77.11 ± 10.26 | 77.00 ± 10.92 | 77.18 ± 9.82 | 0.762 |
| FBG (mmol/l) | 5.39 ± 1.65 | 5.63 ± 1.87 | 5.21 ± 1.35 | <0.001 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.80 ± 1.24 | 1.92 ± 1.27 | 1.74 ± 1.24 | 0.017 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 5.01 ± 0.93 | 5.02 ± 0.97 | 5.01 ± 0.89 | 0.845 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.34 ± 0.42 | 1.30 ± 0.43 | 1.37 ± 0.41 | 0.247 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.91 ± 0.71 | 2.96 ± 0.73 | 2.87 ± 0.69 | 0.030 |
| Non-HDL-C (mmol/l) | 3.53 ± 1.09 | 3.54 ± 1.16 | 3.52 ± 1.06 | 0.730 |
| Waist (cm) | 86.45 ± 9.34 | 88.63 ± 9.12 | 85.02 ± 10.19 | <0.001 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 0.86 ± 0.0.07 | <0.001 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 94.2 ± 14.30 | 88.18 ± 14.19 | 98.63 ± 12.45 | <0.001 |
| Smokers | 380 (26.26) | 175 (30.65) | 205 (23.40) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 755 (52.17) | 418 (73.20) | 337 (38.47) | <0.001 |
| New | 143 (9.88) | 62 (10.86) | 81 (9.24) | 0.360 |
| Anti-drug | 399 (52.85) | 228 (54.54) | 171 (50.74) | 0.333 |
| Diabetes | 302 (20.87) | 183 (24.22) | 119 (18.45) | <0.001 |
| New | 117 (8.09) | 54 (9.46) | 63 (7.19) | 0.148 |
| Anti-drug | 126 (41.72) | 85 (46.44) | 41 (34.45) | 0.038 |
| CHD | 175 (12.09) | 106 (18.56) | 69 (7.88) | <0.001 |
| New | 94 (6.49) | 45 (7.88) | 49 (5.59) | 0.084 |
BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FBG fast blood glucose, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high- density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, eGFR estimated glome-rular filtration rate, CHD coronary heart disease, PWV pulse-wave velocity
Fig. 1Relation between TGs and cf-PWV. The Pearson’s correlation was used to describe the relationships between TGs and cf-PWV. cf-PWV was positive relationship with TGs in 1447 subjects. cf-PWV, carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity; TGs, Triglycerides; X-axis: the value of TGs (mmol/L); Y-axis: the value of cf-PWV (ms−1); r, coefficient of Pearson’s correlation; P < 0.001 with statistical significance
Fig. 2Relation between TGs and cr-PWV. The Pearson’s correlation was used to describe the relationships between TGs and cr-PWV. cr-PWV was positive relationship with TGs in 1447 subjects. cr-PWV, carotid–radial pulse wave velocity; TGs, Triglycerides; X-axis: the value of TGs (mmol/L); Y-axis: the value of cr-PWV (ms−1); r, coefficient of Pearson’s correlation; P < 0.001 with statistical significance
Multiple linear regression analysis of baseline parameters and follow-up arterial stiffness
| Carotid–femoral PWV | Carotid–radial PWV | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | CI |
| β | CI |
| |
| All subjects ( | ||||||
| Age | 0.097 | 0.078 ~ 0.116 | <0.001 | −0.025 | −0.037 ~ −0.012 | <0.001 |
| Male | 0.253 | 0.180 ~ 0.686 | 0.252 | 0.456 | 0.179 ~ 0.734 | <0.001 |
| Smoking | 0.081 | −0.261 ~ 0.424 | 0.641 | 0.049 | −0.170 ~ 0.269 | 0.659 |
| Diabetes | 0.623 | 0.171 ~ 1.076 | 0.007 | 0.232 | 0.058 ~ 0.522 | 0.117 |
| Hypertension | 0.444 | 0.083 ~ 0.805 | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.014 ~ 0.149 | 0.881 |
| TGa | 0.747 | 0.394 ~ 1.100 | <0.001 | 0.367 | 0.140 ~ 0.593 | 0.002 |
| Non-HDL-C | 1.672 | 0.629 ~ 2.715 | 0.002 | 0.173 | 0.062 ~ 0.409 | 0.149 |
| LDL-C | 0.453 | 0.001 ~ 0.905 | 0.049 | 0.020 | −0.269 ~ 0.310 | 0.892 |
| SBP | 0.040 | 0.028 ~ 0.052 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.001 ~ 0.014 | 0.074 |
| DBP | −0.041 | −0.060 ~ −0.022 | <0.001 | 0.012 | 0.001 ~ 0.024 | 0.047 |
| Weight | 0.037 | 0.006 ~ 0.068 | 0.021 | 0.005 | −0.016 ~ 0.025 | 0.657 |
| BMI | 0.160 | 0.073 ~ 0.246 | <0.001 | 0.055 | 0.002 ~ 0.109 | 0.058 |
| Waist | 0.011 | 0.024 ~ 0.047 | 0.521 | 0.005 | 0.008 ~ 0.038 | 0.621 |
| Waist–hip ratio | 1.876 | 0.946 ~ 3.698 | 0.140 | 0.331 | 0.038 ~ 1.169 | 0.790 |
| FBG | 0.127 | 0.021 ~ 0.234 | 0.019 | 0.051 | −0.017 ~ 0.119 | 0.143 |
| eGFRa | −1.672 | −2.715 ~ −0.629 | 0.002 | 0.084 | −0.584 ~ 0.753 | 0.754 |
| Subjects older than 65 years ( | ||||||
| Age | 0.091 | 0.045 ~ 0.137 | <0.001 | −0.032 | −0.056 ~ −0.008 | 0.009 |
| Male | 0.308 | 0.059 ~ 1.372 | 0.408 | 0.029 | −0.354 ~ 0.413 | 0.881 |
| Hypertension | 0.409 | −0.148 ~ 0.966 | 0.138 | −0.020 | −0.311 ~ 0.272 | 0.894 |
| Diabetes | 0.664 | 0.019 ~ 1.346 | 0.057 | −0.158 | −0.516 ~ 0.199 | 0.385 |
| Smoking | 0.097 | −0.456 ~ 0.650 | 0.732 | −0.068 | −0.358 ~ 0.221 | 0.644 |
| TGa | 1.094 | 0.449 ~ 1.738 | 0.001 | 0.524 | 0.186 ~ 0.861 | 0.002 |
| Non-HDL-C | 1.166 | −2.574 ~ 1.965 | 0.174 | −0.202 | −1.840 ~ 1.436 | 0.809 |
| LDL-C | 0.364 | 0.013 ~ 1.191 | 0.388 | 0.053 | −0.380 ~ 0.486 | 0.810 |
| SBP | 0.042 | 0.025 ~ 0.059 | <0.001 | 0.010 | 0.001 ~ 0.019 | 0.026 |
| DBP | −0.052 | −0.082 ~ −0.023 | 0.001 | 0.001 | −0.015 ~ 0.016 | 0.928 |
| Weight | 0.056 | 0.004 ~ 0.109 | 0.036 | 0.034 | 0.007 ~ 0.062 | 0.002 |
| BMI | 0.249 | 0.103 ~ 0.394 | 0.001 | 0.123 | 0.047 ~ 0.200 | 0.002 |
| Waist | 0.039 | 0.020 ~ 0.079 | 0.507 | 0.002 | −0.027 ~ 0.035 | 0.779 |
| Waist–hip ratio | 1.745 | 0.035 ~ 3.004 | 0.066 | 1.022 | −1.988 ~ 4.561 | 0.541 |
| FBG | 0.148 | −0.045 ~ 0.341 | 0.132 | 0.074 | −0.712 ~ 0.860 | 0.853 |
| eGFRa | −1.323 | −2.631 ~ 0.242 | 0.083 | 0.063 | −0.712 ~ 0.869 | 0.847 |
TG triglyceride, non-HDL-C non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BMI body mass index, FBG fast blood glucose, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, PWV pulse wave velocity
a: natural logarithm transformed
§: Covariates in the multiple-adjusted models included age, gender, hypertension, DM, current smoking, levels of plasma TG、non-HDL-C、LDL-C, SBP, DBP,FBG, BMI, weight, Waist, Waist–hip ratio and eGFR
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of baseline TGs indices to predict cf- PWV. ROC analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the value of the area under the curve (AUC)
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of baseline TGs indices to predict cr- PWV. ROC analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the value of the area under the curve (AUC)
Logistic regression analysis for the association between change in TG and change in carotid–femoral PWV
| Carotid-femoral PWVδII | TGδ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI |
| |
| All subjects ( | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.107 | 1.039 ~ 1.299 | 0.012 |
| Model 1 | 1.180 | 1.041 ~ 1.396 | 0.033 |
| Model 2 | 1.296 | 1.064 ~ 1.580 | 0.010 |
| Subjects older than 65 years ( | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.312 | 1.057 ~ 1.745 | 0.002 |
| Model 1 | 1.409 | 1.045 ~ 1.899 | 0.025 |
| Model 2 | 1.526 | 1.088 ~ 2.141 | 0.014 |
TG triglyceride, TGδ change in TG, PWV pulse wave velocity, PWVδII PWVfollow-up-PWVbaseline ≥ 0, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
model 1: age and gender
model 2: age, gender, hypertension, DM, current smoking, baseline carotid-femoral PWV, change in TG, change in non-HDL-C, change in LDL-C, change in SBP, change in DBP, change in BMI, change in weight, change in Waist, change in Waist–hip ratio and change in eGFR