Literature DB >> 27192466

Emergent non-image-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter placement: A cadaver-based study.

Megan Linnebur1, Kenji Inaba, Tobias Haltmeier, Todd E Rasmussen, Jennifer Smith, Ranan Mendelsberg, Daniel Grabo, Demetrios Demetriades.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) insertion for critically injured patients in hemorrhagic shock is performed blindly with fluoroscopic imaging confirmation. The aim of this study was to determine a reliable method for initial REBOA catheter insertion with balloon deployment between the left subclavian artery takeoff and the celiac trunk (CT).
METHODS: Human cadaver study. External surface (sternal notch, mid-sternum, xiphoid) and intravascular (left subclavian artery [LSA], and CT) landmarks were measured from standardized left and right common femoral artery puncture sites. The landing zone (LZ, distance between LSA and CT) and margins of safety (distance from distal balloon edge to LSA and proximal balloon edge to CT) were calculated using intravascular landmarks. The probability of balloon deployment in the LZ using external landmarks was compared in univariate analysis using the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Ten cadavers were analyzed (seven males; mean body mass index, 19.4 kg/m). Mean (SD) intravascular distances from femoral puncture sites to the LSA and CT were 54.8 (1.9) cm and 32.9 (1.9) cm. The mean (SD) LZ was 21.8 (3.8) cm. Mean (SD) surface distances from femoral puncture sites to the xiphoid, mid-sternum, and sternal notch were 31.8 (3.9) cm, 41.8 (3.3) cm, and 51.8 (3.2) cm. Inserting the catheter to a distance approximated by surface distance from the femoral puncture site to mid-sternum resulted in a 100% likelihood balloon deployment in the LZ for both sides. This was superior to the xiphoid and sternal notch (left site, p = 0.005; right site, p = 0.036; mean of both sites, p = 0.083). Using the mid-sternum landmark, the mean (SD) margins of safety to the LSA and CT were 10.7 (4.3) cm and 3.1 (3.4) cm.
CONCLUSION: When using the use of the mid-sternum landmark for REBOA balloon placement, the likelihood of balloon deployment in the LZ was 100% with an acceptable margin of safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27192466     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  14 in total

Review 1.  Expanding the field of acute care surgery: a systematic review of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in cases of morbidly adherent placenta.

Authors:  R Manzano-Nunez; M F Escobar-Vidarte; M P Naranjo; F Rodriguez; P Ferrada; J D Casallas; C A Ordoñez
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  [Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta : Option for incompressible trunk bleeding?]

Authors:  J Knapp; M Bernhard; T Haltmeier; D Bieler; B Hossfeld; M Kulla
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  A contemporary assessment of devices for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): resource-specific options per level of care.

Authors:  Suzanne M Vrancken; Boudewijn L S Borger van der Burg; Paul J E M Vrancken; Gert-Aldert H Kock; Todd E Rasmussen; Rigo Hoencamp
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Placement accuracy of resuscitative endovascular occlusion balloon into the target zone with external measurement.

Authors:  Shokei Matsumoto; Tomohiro Funabiki; Taku Kazamaki; Tomohiko Orita; Kazuhiko Sekine; Motoyasu Yamazaki; Takashi Moriya
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2020-04-29

5.  Three cases of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in austere pre-hospital environment-technical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  J C de Schoutheete; I Fourneau; F Waroquier; L De Cupere; M O'Connor; K Van Cleynenbreugel; J C Ceccaldi; S Nijs
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: evaluation of an educational programme.

Authors:  Jostein Rødseth Brede; Thomas Lafrenz; Andreas J Krüger; Edmund Søvik; Torjus Steffensen; Carlo Kriesi; Martin Steinert; Pål Klepstad
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Does the conventional landmark help to place the tip of REBOA catheter in the optimal position? A non-controlled comparison study.

Authors:  Kento Nakajima; Hayato Taniguchi; Takeru Abe; Keishi Yamaguchi; Tomoki Doi; Ichiro Takeuchi; Naoto Morimura
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Feasibility of Pre-Hospital Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Non-Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jostein Rødseth Brede; Thomas Lafrenz; Pål Klepstad; Eivinn Aardal Skjærseth; Trond Nordseth; Edmund Søvik; Andreas J Krüger
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  A Life Saving Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) with Open Groin Technique.

Authors:  Panu Teeratakulpisarn; Phati Angkasith; Parichat Tanmit; Chaiyut Thanapaisal; Supatcha Prasertcharoensuk; Narongchai Wongkonkitsin
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  Anatomical landmarks for safely implementing resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in zone 1 without fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Yohei Okada; Hiromichi Narumiya; Wataru Ishi; Ryoji Iiduka
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.