Literature DB >> 27192142

South Philadelphia passive sampler and sensor study.

Eben D Thoma1, Halley L Brantley1,2, Karen D Oliver3, Donald A Whitaker1, Shaibal Mukerjee1, Bill Mitchell1, Tai Wu1, Bill Squier4, Elsy Escobar5, Tamira A Cousett6, Carol Ann Gross-Davis7, Howard Schmidt7, Dennis Sosna8, Hallie Weiss8.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: From June 2013 to March 2015, in total 41 passive sampler deployments of 2 wk duration each were conducted at 17 sites in South Philadelphia, PA, with results for benzene discussed here. Complementary time-resolved measurements with lower cost prototype fenceline sensors and an open-path ultraviolet differential optical absorption spectrometer were also conducted. Minimum passive sampler benzene concentrations for each sampling period ranged from 0.08 ppbv to 0.65 ppbv, with a mean of 0.25 ppbv, and were negatively correlated with ambient temperature (-0.01 ppbv/°C, R(2) = 0.68). Co-deployed duplicate passive sampler pairs (N = 609) demonstrated good precision with an average and maximum percent difference of 1.5% and 34%, respectively. A group of passive samplers located within 50 m of a refinery fenceline had a study mean benzene concentration of 1.22 ppbv, whereas a group of samplers located in communities >1 km distant from facilities had a mean of 0.29 ppbv. The difference in the means of these groups was statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.001). A decreasing gradient in benzene concentrations moving away from the facilities was observed, as was a significant period-to-period variation. The highest recorded 2-wk average benzene concentration for the fenceline group was 3.11 ppbv. During this period, time-resolved data from the prototype sensors and the open-path spectrometer detected a benzene signal from the west on one day in particular, with the highest 5-min path-averaged benzene concentration measured at 24 ppbv. IMPLICATIONS: Using a variation of EPA's passive sampler refinery fenceline monitoring method, coupled with time-resolved measurements, a multiyear study in South Philadelphia informed benzene concentrations near facilities and in communities. The combination of measurement strategies can assist facilities in identification and mitigation of emissions from fugitive sources and improve information on air quality complex air sheds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27192142     DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1184724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  7 in total

1.  Sample integrity evaluation and EPA method 325B interlaboratory comparison for select volatile organic compounds collected diffusively on Carbopack X sorbent tubes.

Authors:  Karen D Oliver; Tamira A Cousett; Donald A Whitaker; Luther A Smith; Shaibal Mukerjee; Casson Stallings; Eben D Thoma; Lillian Alston; Maribel Colon; Tai Wu; Stacy Henkle
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Spatial analysis of volatile organic compounds using passive samplers in the Rubbertown industrial area of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Authors:  Shaibal Mukerjee; Luther A Smith; Eben D Thoma; Donald A Whitaker; Karen D Oliver; Rachelle Duvall; Tamira A Cousett
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.352

3.  Using Gas-Phase Air Quality Sensors to Disentangle Potential Sources in a Los Angeles Neighborhood.

Authors:  Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Nicole Wong; Sandy Navarro; Jill Johnston; Michael Hannigan
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Rubbertown Next Generation Emissions Measurement Demonstration Project.

Authors:  Eben Thoma; Ingrid George; Rachelle Duvall; Tai Wu; Donald Whitaker; Karen Oliver; Shaibal Mukerjee; Halley Brantley; Jane Spann; Tiereny Bell; Njeri Carlton-Carew; Parikshit Deshmukh; Jacob Cansler; Tamira Cousett; Wei Tang; Andrea Cooley; Kyle Zimmerman; Billy DeWitt; Bryan Paris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems.

Authors:  Matthew S Landis; Russell W Long; Jonathan Krug; Maribel Colón; Robert Vanderpool; Andrew Habel; Shawn P Urbanski
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Demonstration of VOC Fenceline Sensors and Canister Grab Sampling near Chemical Facilities in Louisville, Kentucky.

Authors:  Megan MacDonald; Eben Thoma; Ingrid George; Rachelle Duvall
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Towards the Development of a Sensor Educational Toolkit to Support Community and Citizen Science.

Authors:  Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Vasileios Papapostolou; Brandon Feenstra; Berj Der Boghossian; Andrea Polidori
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.