Literature DB >> 27191940

Individual differences in face-looking behavior generalize from the lab to the world.

Matthew F Peterson, Jing Lin, Ian Zaun, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

Recent laboratory studies have found large, stable individual differences in the location people first fixate when identifying faces, ranging from the brows to the mouth. Importantly, this variation is strongly associated with differences in fixation-specific identification performance such that individuals' recognition ability is maximized when looking at their preferred location (Mehoudar, Arizpe, Baker, & Yovel, 2014; Peterson & Eckstein, 2013). This finding suggests that face representations are retinotopic and individuals enact gaze strategies that optimize identification, yet the extent to which this behavior reflects real-world gaze behavior is unknown. Here, we used mobile eye trackers to test whether individual differences in face gaze generalize from lab to real-world vision. In-lab fixations were measured with a speeded face identification task, while real-world behavior was measured as subjects freely walked around the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus. We found a strong correlation between the patterns of individual differences in face gaze in the lab and real-world settings. Our findings support the hypothesis that individuals optimize real-world face identification by consistently fixating the same location and thus strongly constraining the space of retinotopic input. The methods developed for this study entailed collecting a large set of high-definition, wide field-of-view natural videos from head-mounted cameras and the viewer's fixation position, allowing us to characterize subjects' actually experienced real-world retinotopic images. These images enable us to ask how vision is optimized not just for the statistics of the "natural images" found in web databases, but of the truly natural, retinotopic images that have landed on actual human retinae during real-world experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27191940     DOI: 10.1167/16.7.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  20 in total

1.  A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.

Authors:  Nitzan Guy; Hagar Azulay; Rasha Kardosh; Yarden Weiss; Ran R Hassin; Salomon Israel; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Developmental prosopagnosics have widespread selectivity reductions across category-selective visual cortex.

Authors:  Guo Jiahui; Hua Yang; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  The Face of Image Reconstruction: Progress, Pitfalls, Prospects.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Andy C H Lee; David C Plaut; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Inferior Occipital Gyrus Is Organized along Common Gradients of Spatial and Face-Part Selectivity.

Authors:  Benjamin de Haas; Martin I Sereno; D Samuel Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Gaze Behavior in a Natural Environment with a Task-Relevant Distractor: How the Presence of a Goalkeeper Distracts the Penalty Taker.

Authors:  Johannes Kurz; Mathias Hegele; Jörn Munzert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-26

7.  Using dual eye tracking to uncover personal gaze patterns during social interaction.

Authors:  Shane L Rogers; Craig P Speelman; Oliver Guidetti; Melissa Longmuir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Using principal component analysis to characterize eye movement fixation patterns during face viewing.

Authors:  Kira Wegner-Clemens; Johannes Rennig; John F Magnotti; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  A relationship between Autism-Spectrum Quotient and face viewing behavior in 98 participants.

Authors:  Kira Wegner-Clemens; Johannes Rennig; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why are you looking at me? It's because I'm talking, but mostly because I'm staring or not doing much.

Authors:  Hannah Scott; Jonathan P Batten; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.