Kenneth M Goins1, Anna S Kitzmann, Mark A Greiner, Young H Kwon, Wallace L M Alward, Johannes Ledolter, Michael D Wagoner. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; †Cornea Research Center, Stephen A. Wynn Institute for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and ‡Department of Management Services, Tippie College of Business, Iowa City, IA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the visual outcomes, device retention, and complications after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) device implantation. METHODS: Comprehensive review of every case of KPro-1 implantation at a tertiary eye care center. RESULTS: The initial KPro-1 procedure, performed in 75 eyes without a previous keratoprosthesis, was included in the analysis. During the first 6 postoperative months, improvement occurred in the mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of 20/1265 to a mean best-obtained postoperative visual acuity of 20/97 (P < 0.001). After a mean follow-up period of 41.4 months (range, 0.8-82.8 months), the final mean best-corrected visual acuity was 20/428. Improved vision was recorded in 43 eyes (57.3%), ambulatory vision (≥20/400) in 47 eyes (62.7%), intermediate functional vision (≥20/80) in 23 eyes (30.7%), and full functional vision (≥20/40) in 11 eyes (14.7%). The initial device was retained in 64 eyes (85.3%), with a Kaplan-Meier retention probability of 96% at 6 months and 82% at 5 years. One or more sight-threatening complications occurred in 51 eyes (68%). These included device extrusion in 11 eyes (14.7%), ulcerative keratitis in 12 eyes (16%), endophthalmitis in 7 eyes (9.3%), sterile vitritis in 3 eyes (4%), retroprosthetic membranes in 25 eyes (33.3%), maculopathy in 26 eyes (34.7%), retinal detachment in 9 eyes (12%), and progressive optic neuropathy in 7 eyes (9.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Boston KPro-1 implantation is associated with satisfactory visual outcomes and excellent device retention in a majority of cases. However, serious postoperative complications are common and may compromise the final visual result.
PURPOSE: To determine the visual outcomes, device retention, and complications after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) device implantation. METHODS: Comprehensive review of every case of KPro-1 implantation at a tertiary eye care center. RESULTS: The initial KPro-1 procedure, performed in 75 eyes without a previous keratoprosthesis, was included in the analysis. During the first 6 postoperative months, improvement occurred in the mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of 20/1265 to a mean best-obtained postoperative visual acuity of 20/97 (P < 0.001). After a mean follow-up period of 41.4 months (range, 0.8-82.8 months), the final mean best-corrected visual acuity was 20/428. Improved vision was recorded in 43 eyes (57.3%), ambulatory vision (≥20/400) in 47 eyes (62.7%), intermediate functional vision (≥20/80) in 23 eyes (30.7%), and full functional vision (≥20/40) in 11 eyes (14.7%). The initial device was retained in 64 eyes (85.3%), with a Kaplan-Meier retention probability of 96% at 6 months and 82% at 5 years. One or more sight-threatening complications occurred in 51 eyes (68%). These included device extrusion in 11 eyes (14.7%), ulcerative keratitis in 12 eyes (16%), endophthalmitis in 7 eyes (9.3%), sterile vitritis in 3 eyes (4%), retroprosthetic membranes in 25 eyes (33.3%), maculopathy in 26 eyes (34.7%), retinal detachment in 9 eyes (12%), and progressive optic neuropathy in 7 eyes (9.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Boston KPro-1 implantation is associated with satisfactory visual outcomes and excellent device retention in a majority of cases. However, serious postoperative complications are common and may compromise the final visual result.
Authors: Jennifer I Lim; Lindsay Machen; Andrea Arteaga; Faris I Karas; Robert Hyde; Dingcai Cao; Marcia Niec; Thasarat S Vajaranant; M Soledad Cortina Journal: Retina Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Mohsin H Ali; Mark S Dikopf; Anthony G Finder; Ahmad A Aref; Thasarat Vajaranant; Jose de la Cruz; Maria Soledad Cortina Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Albert Santos; Luzia Diegues Silva; Luciene Barbosa de Sousa; Denise de Freitas; Lauro Augusto de Oliveira Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Date: 2017-03-14