Recent success of using agents inhibiting the major immune check point, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway, offers a great promise for effective cancer therapy. Two blocking antibodies for PD-1, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have recently been approved for treating advanced recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Activation of PD-1 on T cells and PD-L1 on tumor cells or antigen presenting cells leads to T cell exhaustion and ultimately tumor growth. In this study, we performed flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood samples collected from patients with advanced NSCLC at initial diagnosis. We report that surface expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells has a prognostic value in NSCLC patients, as high expression of PD-1 is associated with a shorter progression-free survival and overall survival. Importantly, we also found that high PD-1 expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells is associated with inferior clinical response in a subset of patients who received anti-PD-L1 treatment, indicating a potential predictive value of this marker. This work highlights the potential of a non-invasive and effective method to determine prognostic and predictive biomarkers for inhibiting the PD-1 pathway in NSCLC patients.
Recent success of using agents inhibiting the major immune check point, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway, offers a great promise for effective cancer therapy. Two blocking antibodies for PD-1, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have recently been approved for treating advanced recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Activation of PD-1 on T cells and PD-L1 on tumor cells or antigen presenting cells leads to T cell exhaustion and ultimately tumor growth. In this study, we performed flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood samples collected from patients with advanced NSCLC at initial diagnosis. We report that surface expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells has a prognostic value in NSCLCpatients, as high expression of PD-1 is associated with a shorter progression-free survival and overall survival. Importantly, we also found that high PD-1 expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells is associated with inferior clinical response in a subset of patients who received anti-PD-L1 treatment, indicating a potential predictive value of this marker. This work highlights the potential of a non-invasive and effective method to determine prognostic and predictive biomarkers for inhibiting the PD-1 pathway in NSCLCpatients.
Entities:
Keywords:
NSCLC; PD-1; T cells; peripheral blood; prognosis
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with approximately 160,000 deaths every year. The majority of these patients have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognosis for metastatic NSCLC is generally poor with the overall five-year survival of < 5% [1]. Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard treatment for advanced NSCLC in addition to targeting patient-specific tumor driving mutations (i.e. EGFR) [2, 3]. These therapies, however, are limited by significant toxicities and development of resistance. Furthermore, only a fraction of these patients have targetable mutations in their tumor.The recent success with using reagents targeting negative regulators of the immune checkpoint proteins PD-1/PD-L1 offers great promise for effective cancer therapy [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway is a major immune checkpoint [10]. The interactions between PD-1 on T cells and PD ligand-1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells or antigen presenting cells (APCs) mutes T cell activation and T-cell-mediated tumor cell killing [11, 12, 13, 14]. Agents blocking the PD-1 pathway, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have recently been approved by the FDA for treating several solid tumors including advanced NSCLC. Antibodies blocking PD-L1 have also demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with NSCLC [15].It is important to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers associated with PD-1 pathway inhibitors to guide clinical decisions. Much attention has been focused on testing PD-1 or PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues, which is challenging due to the difficulties in obtaining tissue samples and the lack of consensus among the available antibodies for immunohistochemistry staining [16, 17, 18, 19]. Here we analyzed blood samples collected from a cohort of 42 patients with advanced stage NSCLC. We utilized flow cytometry to evaluate peripheral expression of PD-1 and further dissect their prognostic and predictive value in NSCLC.
RESULTS
PD-1 is elevated on CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood of patients with NSCLC
We assessed PBMCs from 42 NSCLCpatients at initial diagnosis for PD-1 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. PBMCs from 25 healthy donors (HD) were tested as controls. All 42 patients evaluated in our study were diagnosed with advanced stage (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC (Table 1). As shown in Figure 1A–1B, the frequency of PD-1+ cells among CD4+ T cells from NSCLCpatients was significantly higher than those from HD (mean frequency 13.3%±1.1% vs. 8.8%±0.7%, P=0.0045). In contrast, expression of PD-1 on CD8+ T cells was comparable between NSCLCpatients and HD. The data suggest that CD4+, and not CD8+, T cells play a pivotal role in PD-1-dependent immune tolerance in NSCLCpatients.
Table 1
Characteristics of 42 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients
CD4+ PD-1 % high
CD4+ PD-1 % low
P values
Statistical Test
Age (years)
Median 65
Median 62
0.371
Mann_Whitney U
Gender
Male
5
14
0.337
Fisher's
Female
10
13
0.337
Fisher's
Stage
IIIB
2
2
0.608
Fisher's
IV
13
25
0.608
Fisher's
Histology
Adenocarcinoma
13
20
0.451
Fisher's
SCC
2
7
0.451
Fisher's
Smoking status
Smoker
11
24
0.225
Fisher's
Non-smoker
4
3
0.225
Fisher's
Treatments
Chemotherapy
11
16
0.569
Fisher's
Immunotherapy
2
3
0.569
Fisher's
Targeted therapy
2
8
0.569
Fisher's
Total
15
27
Figure 1
PD-1 expression in CD4+ T cells is higher in NSCLC patients than ones in normal donors
1 million of PBMC from patients or normal donors were used for quantification of PD-1+% in CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined by a Student t test (*, p<0.05).
PD-1 expression in CD4+ T cells is higher in NSCLC patients than ones in normal donors
1 million of PBMC from patients or normal donors were used for quantification of PD-1+% in CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined by a Student t test (*, p<0.05).
Tumor burden is independent of PD-1+ T cells from peripheral blood in patients with NSCLC
We next assessed the correlation of PD-1 expression with clinical characteristics of NSCLCpatients. Greater tumor burden is considered a negative impact on cancer prognosis. We analyzed the correlation between PD-1 expression on peripheral T cells and tumor size in our patients with NSCLC. There was no significant correlation between PD-1 expression on CD8+ T cells and tumor burden (Figure 2B, P=0.450). There was a positive correlation among patients with higher PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells and the presence of smaller tumor burden, but this did not reach statistical significance: (Figure 2A, P=0.861). Consistently, no correlation was found between the PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T cells and the stage of NSCLCpatients (data not shown).
Figure 2
No Correlation between tumor burden and PD-1 expression in CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in 42 patients with advanced NSCLC
A least-squares linear fit is shown as a thick black line. Statistical significance was determined by a Pearson Correlation (p>0.05).
No Correlation between tumor burden and PD-1 expression in CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in 42 patients with advanced NSCLC
A least-squares linear fit is shown as a thick black line. Statistical significance was determined by a Pearson Correlation (p>0.05).
Expression of PD-1 on T cells from peripheral blood does not correlate with PD-L1 expression on tumor tissues in patients with NSCLC
Although controversial, a large number of studies have demonstrated that PD-L1 expression on tumor tissues predicts clinical response to inhibitors of the PD-1 pathway. Among 42 NSCLCpatients evaluated in our study, 19 patients were tested for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in their tumor tissues. We further assessed whether the level of PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T cells associates with PD-L1 in tumor tissues. As shown is Figure 3, the percentage of PD-1 expression on T cells is comparable between PD-L1− and PD-L1+ population. This occurs in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Thus, the expression of PD-1 on T cells from peripheral blood does not associate with PD-L1 expression on tumor tissues in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Figure 3
No correlation between PD-L1 expression in lung cancer tissues and PD-1 expression in CD4+ or CD8+T cells from patients with advanced NSCLC
Statistical significance was determined by a Student t test (p>0.05).
No correlation between PD-L1 expression in lung cancer tissues and PD-1 expression in CD4+ or CD8+T cells from patients with advanced NSCLC
Statistical significance was determined by a Student t test (p>0.05).
High expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells at initial diagnosis associates with poor clinical outcome in NSCLC
Based on the level of PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells, we defined high-PD-1 (PD-1>12.27%) vs. low-PD-1 (PD-1<12.27%) subgroups in NSCLCpatients. The mean value (12.27%) of PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells of the 42 NSCLCpatients was the cutoff. Seventeen patients are classified in the high-PD-1 group and 25 in the low-PD-1 group. We analyzed clinical characteristics and found no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, histology, stage, smoking history, and treatments (chemotherapy, targeted-therapy or immunotherapy). We next investigated PD-1 expression on clinical outcome. We found a significantly lower rate of both overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in the high-PD-1 group compared with the low-PD-1 group (median OS: 397 days vs. 721 days, P=0.028, Figure 4A; median PFS: 88 days vs. 391 days, P=0.044, Figure 4B). Consistent with this finding, elevated PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells was observed in patients with early progression of disease, compared with patients who had partial response and stable disease (Figure 5). These data demonstrate that PD-1 expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells is associated with worse clinical outcomes in NSCLC, independent of age, stage, and histology type. In addition, the same analyses were performed for CD8+ T cells and no correlation between PD-1 expression on peripheral CD8+ T cells and clinical outcomes was observed (Figure 4C–4D, Figure 5B).
Figure 4
High expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells at initial diagnosis associated with poor clinical outcome in advanced NSCLC patients
Kaplan-Meier curves of 42 patients with advanced NSCLC segregated into 2 groups A, B. according to the median value of PD-1+ CD4+% cells (with 12.27% as a threshold). PD-1+% CD4+ cells >12.27% was defined as PD-1+% high while <12.27% as PD-1+% low. Likewise, these 42 patients were also segregated into 2 groups C, D. according to the median value of PD-1+ CD8+% cells (with 11.75% as a threshold). PD-1+% CD8+ cells >11.75% was defined as PD-1+% high while <11.75% as PD-1+% low. Statistical significance was determined by a Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test.
Figure 5
Elevated PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells was correlated with disease progression
1 million of PBMC from patients with progressed disease (PD) or stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) were used for quantification of PD-1+% in CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined by a Student t test (*, p<0.05).
High expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells at initial diagnosis associated with poor clinical outcome in advanced NSCLC patients
Kaplan-Meier curves of 42 patients with advanced NSCLC segregated into 2 groups A, B. according to the median value of PD-1+ CD4+% cells (with 12.27% as a threshold). PD-1+% CD4+ cells >12.27% was defined as PD-1+% high while <12.27% as PD-1+% low. Likewise, these 42 patients were also segregated into 2 groups C, D. according to the median value of PD-1+ CD8+% cells (with 11.75% as a threshold). PD-1+% CD8+ cells >11.75% was defined as PD-1+% high while <11.75% as PD-1+% low. Statistical significance was determined by a Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test.
Elevated PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells was correlated with disease progression
1 million of PBMC from patients with progressed disease (PD) or stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) were used for quantification of PD-1+% in CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined by a Student t test (*, p<0.05).
High expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells at initial diagnosis associates with poor clinical outcome after anti-PD-L1 treatment
Six patienttumors were found to be PD-L1 positive by immunohistochemistry. Five of these patients were treated with a PD-L1 inhibitor while one patient received chemotherapy. We further dissected the association of PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood to clinical outcome. Among the three patients who had low PD-1 expression at initial diagnosis, two had stable disease; one had disease progression at day 264. All three are alive at the last follow-up (day 645, 539, and 461 respectively). In contrast, all three patients who had high PD-1 expression had disease progression (at day 52, 43, and 120 respectively), two of whom had died at day 268 and 466 (Table 2). Although our conclusion is limited due to the small sample size, we see a trend that high PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood associates with poor clinical outcome after treatment with anti-PD-L1 antibody, indicating a potential value of this marker in prediction of response to PD-1 pathway inhibitors.
Table 2
Characteristics of 6 advanced NSCLC patients with positive PDL-1
Patient #
Patient #1
Patient #2
Patient #3
Patient #4
Patient #5
Patient #6
age
66
67
65
77
55
57
gender
female
female
female
female
female
female
histology
ACA
ACA
SCC
ACA
ACA
ACA
Smoking status
smoker
smoker
smoker
Non-smoker
Non-smoker
smoker
PD-1% CD4+
6.12
12.18
9.99
25.89
15.73
25.53
last follow-up
645 days with stable disease
539 days with stable disease
264 days with progressed disease
43 days died with progressed disease
120 days with progressed disease
52 days died with progressed disease
Note: ACA is abbreviation for adenocarcinoma, SCC is abbreviation for squamous cell carcinoma.
Note: ACA is abbreviation for adenocarcinoma, SCC is abbreviation for squamous cell carcinoma.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we evaluated the phenotype of peripheral blood T cells collected from NSCLCpatients and determined the correlation between PD-1 expression on T cell of peripheral blood with clinical outcome. The three most important findings are: 1) PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells is significantly elevated in patients with NSCLC at initial diagnosis, compared with those of healthy donors. 2) High expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells is strongly associated with poor clinical outcome manifested by significant shorter OS and PFS in patient with NSCLC and this is prognostic. 3) PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells has potential predictive value in NSCLC as high PD-1 expression associates with worse clinical outcome after anti-PD-L1 treatment.Recent success at targeting immune inhibitory pathways has brought great deal of excitement in the field of cancer therapy. PD-1 is a key receptor expressed on T cells that can mediate immunosuppression by interacting with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 on tumor or antigen presenting cells [21, 22]. Inhibiting PD-1 pathway can enhance anti-tumor activity of cytotoxic T cells. Two blocking antibodies to PD-1, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have recently been approved by FDA for treating advanced solid tumors including NSCLC. Overall response rate of approximately 20% was achieved in patients with refractory NSCLC [23, 24]. It is important to determine the prognostic and predictive biomarkers that identify patients with high risk of disease progression and patients who will respond to PD-1 inhibitors.Our finding of high expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells associates with poor clinical outcome has significant clinical implications as it provides a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with NSCLC. It has been challenging to determine the prognostic value of molecules involved in PD-1 pathway such as PD-L1 and PD-1. Previously published reports have been controversial with some showing a poor prognostic value and others with good or no prognostic significance [16, 17, 18, 19, 25, 26]. The majority of the studies were performed in tumor tissues so that the PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and PD-1 expression on tumors infiltrated by lymphocytes were tested. The challenge is largely due to the small cohorts, limited tissue samples available, and lack of validated experimental methods to quantify the PD-1 or PD-L1 expression in tissues.In our study, we used peripheral blood samples from patients with NSCLC to demonstrate a negative prognostic value of PD-1 in this population, i.e. high expression of PD-1 associates with poor PFS and OS. It is speculated that high-PD-1 expression in T cells results in immunosuppressed state and less functional for anti-tumor response leading to tumor progression and poor overall clinical outcome. Importantly, we bypassed the need for invasive tissue biopsy, which leads to treatment delays along with a potential risk of complications. Flow cytometry is a defined and well-quantitative method to determine the level of PD-1 expression on blood cells as PD-1 antibodies used in this test has been validated and widely used. Our study provided a highly feasible and effective clinical method to determine the prognosis of patients with NSCLC.Considerable effort has been placed to identify the predictive biomarker for clinical response to PD-1 pathway treatment. The majority of the studies demonstrated a strong predictive association between tumor surface expressions of PD-L1 and response/outcome. However, it is worthwhile to note that a small portion of patients who are PD-L1 negative do respond to anti-PD-1/anti PD-L1 treatment. In addition, although promising and durable responses were achieved in some patients, others failed to show evidence of activity. In the phase I clinical study testing the safety and efficacy of anit-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer, 10% (5/49) objective response and 24% (12/49) stable disease were reported [15]. To identify patients who might benefit from those treatments will be of great clinical impact. In our study, we analyzed PD-1 expression on T cells from peripheral blood of patients receiving anti-PD-L1 treatment. All patients were tested positive for PD-L1. We observed poor clinical outcome in patients with high PD-1 expression at initial diagnosis. This has a significant impact on data providing a potential predictive biomarker for NSCLCpatients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 targeted treatment. It should be noted that our data is limited by a small sample size.In summary, our study demonstrates a prognostic value of PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood of patients with NSCLC. High PD-1 expression associates with poor clinical outcome. In addition, testing peripheral PD-1 expression has the potential to predict clinical response to treatment of blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
All 42 patients met the clinical radiological and histological criteria for advanced stage (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC (Table 1). The patients' age ranged from 47 to 82 years old (median 64 years old). There were 19 males and 23 females. Peripheral blood specimens from these patients were obtained, and informed consents were signed for sample collection according to a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of Penn State Hershey College of Medicine. Buffy coats from 25 age- and gender-matched normal donors were also obtained from the blood bank of Milton S. Hershey Medicine Center at the College of Medicine. PBMC were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient separation as described previously [20]. Cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion assay with more than 95% viability in all the samples.
Immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometric analysis
One million PBMCs from patients or normal donors were used to quantify PD-1+% in CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry. The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining: PerCP-Cy5.5 conjugated mouse anti-humanCD3 (BD Pharmingen, Cat: 560835), FITC conjugated mouse anti-humanCD4 (BioLegend, Cat: 317408), APC-Cy7 conjugated mouse anti-humanCD8 (BioLegend, Cat: 344714) and PE conjugated mouse anti-humanPD-1 (BioLegend, Cat: 329906).
Statistical analysis
Differences among two groups were statistically analyzed using a two-tailed Student's t test. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS); log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to analyze the statistic difference between the PD-1+% low vs. PD-1+% high patients. Correlation of PD-1 expressed T cells and tumor burden, which was measured following Recist 1.1 guideline, was assessed by Pearson Correlation analysis. A statistically significant difference was reported with p indicated where applicable. Data are reported as the mean ± SE from at least three separate experiments.
Authors: F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Susan M Kuntz; Bradley C Leibovich; Haidong Dong; Christine M Lohse; W Scott Webster; Shomik Sengupta; Igor Frank; Alexander S Parker; Horst Zincke; Michael L Blute; Thomas J Sebo; John C Cheville; Eugene D Kwon Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Harriet Kluger; Margaret K Callahan; Michael A Postow; Naiyer A Rizvi; Alexander M Lesokhin; Neil H Segal; Charlotte E Ariyan; Ruth-Ann Gordon; Kathleen Reed; Matthew M Burke; Anne Caldwell; Stephanie A Kronenberg; Blessing U Agunwamba; Xiaoling Zhang; Israel Lowy; Hector David Inzunza; William Feely; Christine E Horak; Quan Hong; Alan J Korman; Jon M Wigginton; Ashok Gupta; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ji-Cheng Hu; Xiao-Qing Chai; Di Wang; Shu-Hua Shu; Costan G Magnussen; Li-Xia Xie; Shan-Shan Hu Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Tom B Davidson; Alexander Lee; Melody Hsu; Shaina Sedighim; Joey Orpilla; Janet Treger; Max Mastall; Saskia Roesch; Carmen Rapp; Mildred Galvez; Aaron Mochizuki; Joseph Antonios; Alejandro Garcia; Nikesh Kotecha; Nicholas Bayless; David Nathanson; Anthony Wang; Richard Everson; William H Yong; Timothy F Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Christel Herold-Mende; Robert M Prins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alexandra M Miggelbrink; Joshua D Jackson; Selena J Lorrey; Ethan S Srinivasan; Jessica Waibl-Polania; Daniel S Wilkinson; Peter E Fecci Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ramy R Saleh; Jordan L Scott; Nicholas Meti; Danielle Perlon; Rouhi Fazelzad; Alberto Ocana; Eitan Amir Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Li Yang; MingJing Shen; Li Jun Xu; Xiaodong Yang; Ying Tsai; Peter C Keng; Yuhchyau Chen; Soo Ok Lee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Boris Duchemann; Jordi Remon; Marie Naigeon; Lydie Cassard; Jean Mehdi Jouniaux; Lisa Boselli; Jonathan Grivel; Edouard Auclin; Aude Desnoyer; Benjamin Besse; Nathalie Chaput Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2021-06