Literature DB >> 27190101

Early clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable, high-risk and intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis.

Susheel Kodali1, Vinod H Thourani2, Jonathon White3, S Chris Malaisrie4, Scott Lim5, Kevin L Greason6, Mathew Williams7, Mayra Guerrero8, Andrew C Eisenhauer9, Samir Kapadia10, Dean J Kereiakes11, Howard C Herrmann12, Vasilis Babaliaros2, Wilson Y Szeto12, Rebecca T Hahn3, Philippe Pibarot13, Neil J Weissman14, Jonathon Leipsic15, Philipp Blanke15, Brian K Whisenant16, Rakesh M Suri10, Raj R Makkar17, Girma M Ayele18, Lars G Svensson10, John G Webb15, Michael J Mack19, Craig R Smith3, Martin B Leon3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Based on randomized trials using first-generation devices, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is well established in the treatment of high-risk (HR) patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). To date, there is a paucity of adjudicated, prospective data evaluating outcomes with newer generation devices and in lower risk patients. We report early outcomes of a large, multicentre registry of inoperable, HR, and intermediate-risk (IR) patients undergoing treatment with the next-generation SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (THV). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with severe, symptomatic AS (583 high surgical risk or inoperable and 1078 IR) were enrolled in a multicentre, non-randomized registry at 57 sites in the USA and Canada. All patients received TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 system via transfemoral (n = 1443, 86.9%) and transapical or transaortic (n = 218, 13.1%) access routes. The rate of 30-day all-cause mortality was 2.2% in HR/inoperable patients [mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score 8.7%] and 1.1% in IR patients (mean STS score 5.3%); cardiovascular mortality was 1.4 and 0.9%, respectively. In HR/inoperable patients, the 30-day rate of major/disabling stroke was 0.9%, major bleeding 14.0%, major vascular complications 5.1%, and requirement for permanent pacemaker 13.3%. In IR patients, the 30-day rate of major/disabling stroke was 1.0%, major bleeding 10.6%, major vascular complications 6.1%, and requirement for permanent pacemaker 10.1%. Mean overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score increased from 47.8 to 67.8 (HR/inoperable, P < 0.0001) and 54.7 to 74.0 (IR, P < 0.0001). Overall, paravalvular regurgitation at 30 days was none/trace in 55.9% of patients, mild in 40.7%, moderate in 3.4%, and severe in 0.0%. Mean gradients among patients with paired baseline and 30-day or discharge echocardiograms decreased from 45.8 mmHg at baseline to 11.4 mmHg at 30 days, while aortic valve area increased from 0.69 to 1.67 cm(2).
CONCLUSIONS: The SAPIEN 3 THV system was associated with low rates of 30-day mortality and major/disabling stroke as well as low rates of moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01314313. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAVI; TAVR; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27190101      PMCID: PMC6392433          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  24 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Outcomes with post-dilation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER I trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve).

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Philippe Pibarot; John Webb; Josep Rodes-Cabau; Howard C Herrmann; Mathew Williams; Raj Makkar; Wilson Y Szeto; Michael L Main; Vinod H Thourani; E Murat Tuzcu; Samir Kapadia; Jodi Akin; Thomas McAndrew; Ke Xu; Martin B Leon; Susheel K Kodali
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: 1-Year Results From the All-Comers NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod; Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Henrik Nissen; Bo Juel Kjeldsen; Petur Petursson; Yanping Chang; Olaf Walter Franzen; Thomas Engstrøm; Peter Clemmensen; Peter Bo Hansen; Lars Willy Andersen; Peter Skov Olsen; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Contemporary real-world outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in 141,905 low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Vinod H Thourani; Rakesh M Suri; Rebecca L Gunter; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Gorav Ailawadi; Wilson Y Szeto; Todd M Dewey; Robert A Guyton; Joseph E Bavaria; Vasilis Babaliaros; James S Gammie; Lars Svensson; Mathew Williams; Vinay Badhwar; Michael J Mack
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Popma; David H Adams; Michael J Reardon; Steven J Yakubov; Neal S Kleiman; David Heimansohn; James Hermiller; G Chad Hughes; J Kevin Harrison; Joseph Coselli; Jose Diez; Ali Kafi; Theodore Schreiber; Thomas G Gleason; John Conte; Maurice Buchbinder; G Michael Deeb; Blasé Carabello; Patrick W Serruys; Sharla Chenoweth; Jae K Oh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Jan Minners; Martin Allgeier; Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf; Rolf-Peter Kienzle; Franz-Josef Neumann; Nikolaus Jander
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ronald K Binder; John G Webb; Alexander B Willson; Marina Urena; Nicolaj C Hansson; Bjarne L Norgaard; Philippe Pibarot; Marco Barbanti; Eric Larose; Melanie Freeman; Eric Dumont; Chris Thompson; Miriam Wheeler; Robert R Moss; Tae-hyun Yang; Sergio Pasian; Cameron J Hague; Giang Nguyen; Rekha Raju; Stefan Toggweiler; James K Min; David A Wood; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Transfemoral aortic valve replacement with the repositionable Lotus Valve System in high surgical risk patients: the REPRISE I study.

Authors:  Ian T Meredith; Stephen G Worthley; Robert J Whitbourn; Paul Antonis; Joseph K Montarello; Andrew E Newcomb; Siohban Lockwood; Nicole Haratani; Dominic J Allocco; Keith D Dawkins
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.534

9.  Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System: 12-Month Outcomes of the Evaluation of the Direct Flow Medical Percutaneous Aortic Valve 18F System for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (DISCOVER) Study.

Authors:  Thierry Lefèvre; Antonio Colombo; Didier Tchétché; Azeem Latib; Silvio Klugmann; Jean Fajadet; Federico De Marco; Francesco Maisano; Giuseppe Bruschi; Klaudija Bijuklic; Stefano Nava; Neil Weissman; Reginald Low; Martyn Thomas; Christopher Young; Simon Redwood; Michael Mullen; John Yap; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig; Jan-Malte Sinning; Karl Eugen Hauptmann; Ivar Friedrich; Michael Lauterbach; Michael Schmoeckel; Charles Davidson; Joachim Schofer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Michael J Mack; J Matthew Brennan; Ralph Brindis; John Carroll; Fred Edwards; Fred Grover; David Shahian; E Murat Tuzcu; Eric D Peterson; John S Rumsfeld; Kathleen Hewitt; Cynthia Shewan; Joan Michaels; Barb Christensen; Alexander Christian; Sean O'Brien; David Holmes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: why is this still happening?

Authors:  Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Rapid adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate- and high-risk patients to treat severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Sigitas Cesna; Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Shifting paradigms for treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis in lower risk populations: role of a newer generation balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation device.

Authors:  Erik Walter Holy; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

4.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 valve: preparing the field for the final expansion.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Paradis; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02

5.  Transcaval Access and Closure for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Prospective Investigation.

Authors:  Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Marcus Y Chen; Annette M Stine; Toby Rogers; William W O'Neill; Gaetano Paone; Vinod H Thourani; Kamran I Muhammad; Robert A Leonardi; Stephen Ramee; James F Troendle; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: favorable clinical outcomes support role in intermediate risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Ravilla Mahidhar; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation at institutions without cardiovascular surgery departments: many questions still linger before a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Chiara Fraccaro; Giuseppe Tarantini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Alternate Access for TAVI: Stay Clear of the Chest.

Authors:  Pavel Overtchouk; Thomas Modine
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-09

9.  Impact of valvular resistance on aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement according to the type of prosthesis.

Authors:  Masahiko Asami; Thomas Pilgrim; Stefan Stortecky; Dik Heg; Eva Roost; Stephan Windecker; Lukas Hunziker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Lower Surgical Risk Patients: Review of Major Trials and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Mike Saji; D Scott Lim
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.