| Literature DB >> 27189638 |
Lihuai Yu1, Shunan Wang1, Luoyang Ding1, Xianghuan Liang2, Mengzhi Wang1, Li Dong1, Hongrong Wang1.
Abstract
The objective of the current study was to investigate the effects of dietary ω-6/ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratios on lipid metabolism in goslings. One hundred and sixty 21-day-old Yangzhou geese of similar weight were randomly divided into 4 groups. They were fed different PUFA-supplemented diets (the 4 diets had ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratios of 12:1, 9:1, 6:1, or 3:1). The geese were slaughtered and samples of liver and muscle were collected at day 70. The activities and the gene expression of enzymes involved in lipid metabolism were measured. The results show that the activities of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC), malic enzyme (ME), and fatty acid synthase (FAS) were lower (p<0.05), but the activities of hepatic lipase (HL) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) were higher (p<0.05), in the liver and the muscle from the 3:1 and 6:1 groups compared with those in the 9:1 and 12:1 groups. Expression of the genes for FAS (p<0.01), ME (p<0.01) and ACC (p<0.05) were higher in the muscle of groups fed diets with higher ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratios. Additionally, in situ hybridization tests showed that the expression intensities of the high density lipoprotein (HDL-R) gene in the 12:1 and 9:1 groups were significantly lower (p<0.01) than that of the 3:1 group in the muscle of goslings. In conclusion, diets containing lower ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratios (3:1 or 6:1) could decrease fat deposition by inhibiting fat synthesis in goslings.Entities:
Keywords: Goose; Lipid Metabolism; ω-6/ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid
Year: 2016 PMID: 27189638 PMCID: PMC5003969 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.15.1056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Composition and nutrient levels of the experimental diets (based on air-dried samples) (%)
| Items | ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 12:1 | 9:1 | 6:1 | 3:1 | |
| Ingredients | ||||
| Corn | 66.20 | 66.20 | 66.20 | 66.20 |
| Soybean meal | 17.30 | 17.30 | 17.30 | 17.30 |
| Alfalfa powder | 10.70 | 10.70 | 10.70 | 10.70 |
| Peanut oil | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.16 | 1.06 |
| Sunflower seed oil | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| Linseed oil | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.32 |
| Palmitic acid | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.40 |
| Oleic acid | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| CaH2PO4 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Limestone | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| L-Lys·HCl | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Met | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| NaCl | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Premix 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels (based on DM) | ||||
| CP | 14.34 | 14.34 | 14.34 | 14.34 |
| Metabolic energy (MJ/kg) | 11.70 | 11.70 | 11.70 | 11.70 |
| Crude fiber | 5.27 | 5.27 | 5.27 | 5.27 |
| Ca | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| AP | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| SFA | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
| MUFA | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| PUFA | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.66 |
| n-6 PUFA | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| n-3 PUFA | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.16 |
| ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratio | 12.05:1 | 9.13:1 | 5.93:1 | 3.10:1 |
PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; AP, available phosphorus; SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; LA, lactic acid.
One kg of premix contains the following: vitamin A, 10,000 IU; vitamin D3, 3,000 IU; vitamin E, 30 mg; vitamin K3, 2 mg; vitamin B1, 5 mg; vitamin B2, 7 mg; vitamin B6, 5 mg; vitamin B12, 20 μg; nicotinic acid, 38 mg; pantothenic acid, 9 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; biotin, 35 μg; choline chloride, 6 g; Cu, 5 mg; I, 0.9 mg; Fe, 100 mg; Zn, 110 mg; Mn, 100 mg; Se, 0.15 mg; Co, 0.5 mg.
LA, LNA and ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratio were all measured values, other values were calculated.
Sequences of polymerase chain reaction primers
| Gene name | ID in GeneBank | The sequence of primers (5′-3′) | Production (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| J03541 | F: TCTCGCTTTATTATTGGTT | 312 | |
| AF408407 | F: GCTGCAATTGGTGGTGCTT | 106 | |
| J04485 | F: TGAAGGACCTTATCGCATTGC | 195 | |
| L08165 | F: TGCGTGACATCAAGGAGAAG | 300 |
ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; ME, malic enzyme; FAS, fatty acid synthase.
The effects of ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratios on the activities of enzymes involved in fat metabolism in goslings (U/mg)
| Item | Tissue | 12:1 | 9:1 | 6:1 | 3:1 | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | 4.95a | 4.01b | 3.20c | 3.10c | 0.18 | |
| Leg muscle | 1.83a | 1.40b | 0.84c | 0.80c | 0.09 | |
| Liver | 4.30a | 3.86ab | 3.20c | 3.10c | 0.20 | |
| Leg muscle | 3.40a | 3.26a | 2.64c | 2.14c | 0.17 | |
| Liver | 8.84a | 8.10a | 5.08c | 4.79c | 0.98 | |
| Leg muscle | 2.88a | 2.91a | 1.45c | 1.40c | 0.23 | |
| Liver | 56.77c | 64.17bc | 71.95ab | 75.68a | 3.79 | |
| Leg muscle | 2.35c | 3.01ab | 3.50a | 3.09a | 0.31 | |
| Liver | 2.40c | 2.80bc | 3.07ab | 3.49a | 0.21 | |
| Leg muscle | 4.75c | 5.04c | 5.42bc | 6.21a | 0.35 |
PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; SEM, standard error of the mean; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; ME, malic enzyme; FAS, fatty acid synthase; HL, hepatic lipase; LPL, lipoprotein lipase.
Values in the same row with the same superscript were not significantly different (p>0.05); values in the same row with different superscripts were significantly different (p<0.05); values with different superscripts were significantly different (p<0.01).
The effects of ω-6/ω-3 PUFA ratio on the expression genes critical to fat metabolism in goslings
| Item | Tissue | 12:1 | 9:1 | 6:1 | 3:1 | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leg muscle | 5.09a | 3.44b | 2.84bc | 2.39c | 0.33 | |
| Leg muscle | 5.90a | 4.86ab | 3.45c | 3.15c | 0.17 | |
| Leg muscle | 7.62a | 6.92ab | 4.97cd | 3.98d | 0.89 | |
| HDL-R positive rates | Leg muscle | 42.71b | 47.61b | 55.22ab | 58.79a | 1.35 |
| LDL-R positive rates | Leg muscle | 55.36 | 54.23 | 51.04 | 51.30 | 4.23 |
PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; SEM, the standard error of the mean; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; ME, malic enzyme; FAS, fatty acid synthase; HDL-R, high density lipoprotein receptor; LDL-R, low density lipoprotein receptor.
Values in the same row with the same superscript were not significantly different (p>0.05); values in the same row with different superscripts were significantly different (p<0.05); values with different superscripts were significantly different (p<0.01).
Figure 1The gene expression of HDL-R in the leg muscle measured by in situ hybridization. Five to ten slides for each tissue were prepared, and images were taken using a binocular microscope (Olympus BX5; Olympus, Japan) coupled to a digital camera (Nikon H550L, Japan). The four images shown in Figure 1 were magnified 400 times. The in situ hybridization images show that the 12:1 and 9:1 groups had lower levels of labeling than the 6:1 and 3:1 groups. The positive rates of HDL-R expression in the 12:1 and 9:1 groups were significantly lower (p<0.01) than that of the 3:1 group (shown in Table 2).
Figure 2The gene expression of LDL-R in the leg muscle measured by in situ hybridization. Five to ten slides for each tissue were prepared, and images were taken using binocular microscope (Olympus BX5; Olympus, Japan) coupled to a digital camera (Nikon H550L, Japan). The four images shown in Figure 2 were all magnified 400. Figure 2 shows that the positive rates of LDL-R expression between the different groups had a tendency to decrease with decreasing ω-6/ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratios (data shown in Table 2).