Literature DB >> 22810469

Abdominoperineal excision: evolution of a centenary operation.

Fábio Guilherme Campos1, Angelita Habr-Gama, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Rodrigo Oliva Perez.   

Abstract

During the last century, great improvements have been made in rectal cancer management regarding preoperative staging, pathologic assessment, surgical technique, and multimodal therapies. Surgically, there was a move from a strategy characterized by simple perineal excision to complex procedures performed by means of a laparoscopic approach, and more recently with the aid of robotic systems. Perhaps the most important advance is that rectal cancer is no longer a fatal disease as it was at the beginning of the 20th century. This achievement is definitely due in part to Ernest Mile's contribution regarding lymphatic spread of tumor cells, which helped clarify the natural history of the disease and the proper treatment alternatives. He advocated a combined approach with the rationale to clear "the zone of upward spread." The aim of the present paper is to present a brief review concerning the evolution of rectal cancer surgery, focusing attention on Miles' abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APR) and its controversies and refinements over time. Although APR has currently been restricted to a small proportion of patients with low rectal cancer, recent propositions to excise the rectum performing a wider perineal and a proper pelvic floor resection have renewed interest on this procedure, confirming that Ernest Miles' original ideas still influence rectal cancer management after more than 100 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22810469     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ab0f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

Review 1.  Total Mesorectal Excision Technique-Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joep Knol; Deborah S Keller
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-04-28

2.  Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Guilherme P São Julião; Adrian Mattacheo; Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato; Edgar Aleman; Bruna B Vailati; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues; Rodrigo Oliva Perez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos).

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Seung Hyuk Baik; Jeonghyun Kang; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung-Kook Sohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Predictors of wound dehiscence and its impact on mortality after abdominoperineal resection: data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  A Rencuzogullari; E Gorgun; S Binboga; G Ozuner; H Kessler; M A Abbas
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: Where to go.

Authors:  Yu Tao; Jia-Gang Han; Zhen-Jun Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates.

Authors:  Cristopher Varela; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-12-22

7.  Long-term outcomes after extra-levator versus conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Haoyu Zhang; Ganbin Li; Ke Cao; Zhiwei Zhai; Guanghui Wei; Chunxiang Ye; Baocheng Zhao; Zhenjun Wang; Jiagang Han
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.030

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.