Literature DB >> 27189020

The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial.

Lean Beulen1, Michelle van den Berg1, Brigitte Hw Faas2, Ilse Feenstra2, Michiel Hageman3, John Mg van Vugt1, Mireille N Bekker1.   

Abstract

Early in pregnancy women and their partners face the complex decision on whether or not to participate in prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Several studies show that the majority of pregnant women currently do not make informed decisions regarding prenatal testing. As the range of prenatal tests is expanding due to the development of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), autonomous reproductive decision-making is increasingly challenging. In this study, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of a web-based multimedia decision aid on decision-making regarding prenatal testing. The decision aid provided both written and audiovisual information on prenatal tests currently available, that is, prenatal screening by first-trimester combined testing, NIPT and invasive diagnostic testing through chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Furthermore, it contained values clarification exercises encouraging pregnant women to reflect on the potential harms and benefits of having prenatal tests performed. The use of the decision aid improved informed decision-making regarding prenatal testing. Of pregnant women allocated to the intervention group (n=130) 82.3% made an informed choice compared with 66.4% of women in the control group (n=131), P=0.004. As the vast majority of pregnant women made decisions consistent with their attitudes towards having prenatal testing performed, this improvement in informed decision-making could be attributed mainly to an increase in decision-relevant knowledge. This study shows that the implementation of a web-based multimedia decision aid directly facilitates the ultimate goal of prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, which is enabling informed autonomous reproductive choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27189020      PMCID: PMC5027684          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  27 in total

1.  Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: what knowledge is relevant?

Authors:  H M H J D Schoonen; H M E van Agt; M L Essink-Bot; H I Wildschut; E A P Steegers; H J de Koning
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-25

Review 2.  Prenatal genetic care: debates and considerations of the past, present and future.

Authors:  Brigitte H W Faas
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.388

3.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ulla Björklund; Anna Marsk; Charlotta Levin; Susanne Georgsson Öhman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-07-31

5.  A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients.

Authors:  A G W Hunter; M Cappelli; L Humphreys; J E Allanson; T T Chiu; C Peeters; D Moher; A Zimak
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Elizabeth Dormandy; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-09

7.  Validation of a decision regret scale.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 8.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M Green; J Hewison; H L Bekker; L D Bryant; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette M O'Connor; Carol Bennett; Robert G Newcombe; Mary Politi; Marie-Anne Durand; Elizabeth Drake; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Sara Khangura; Anton Saarimaki; Stephanie Sivell; Mareike Stiel; Steven J Bernstein; Nananda Col; Angela Coulter; Karen Eden; Martin Härter; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Nora Moumjid; Dawn Stacey; Richard Thomson; Tim Whelan; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Heather Skirton; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  15 in total

1.  Patient characteristics, experiences and perceived value of pharmacogenetic testing from a single testing laboratory.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Yiling Liu
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Nationwide implementation of the non-invasive prenatal test: Evaluation of a blended learning program for counselors.

Authors:  Linda Martin; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Caroline J Bax; Mijntje J Pieters; Jacqueline C I Y Reijerink-Verheij; Robert-Jan Galjaard; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Aimée C Dane; Madelyn Peterson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J F M van den Heuvel; J J Huisman; E M Lutke Holzik; M N Bekker; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Offering pregnant women different levels of genetic information from prenatal chromosome microarray: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jane L Halliday; Cecile Muller; Taryn Charles; Fiona Norris; Joanne Kennedy; Sharon Lewis; Bettina Meiser; Susan Donath; Zornitza Stark; George McGillivray; Melody Menezes; Sian K Smith; Della Forster; Susan Walker; Mark Pertile; David J Amor
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.

Authors:  Rachèl V van Schendel; G C Lieve Page-Christiaens; Lean Beulen; Catia M Bilardo; Marjon A de Boer; Audrey B C Coumans; Brigitte H Faas; Irene M van Langen; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Merel C van Maarle; Merryn V E Macville; Dick Oepkes; Eva Pajkrt; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Access to Genetic Counselors in the Southern United States.

Authors:  Catalina Villegas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-07-01

8.  'Small cost to pay for peace of mind': Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Hilary Bowman-Smart; Julian Savulescu; Cara Mand; Christopher Gyngell; Mark D Pertile; Sharon Lewis; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.100

9.  The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Authors:  Sophie Montgomery; Zaneta M Thayer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Comparing Interrater reliability between eye examination and eye self-examination 1.

Authors:  Maria Alzete de Lima; Lorita Marlena Freitag Pagliuca; Jennara Cândido do Nascimento; Joselany Áfio Caetano
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.