Literature DB >> 27188218

Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study.

Ilkka Laakso1, Satoshi Tanaka2, Marko Mikkonen3, Soichiro Koyama4, Norihiro Sadato5, Akimasa Hirata6.   

Abstract

The electric field produced in the brain is the main physical agent of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Inter-subject variations in the electric fields may help to explain the variability in the effects of tDCS. Here, we use multiple-subject analysis to study the strength and variability of the group-level electric fields in the standard brain space. Personalized anatomically-accurate models of 62 subjects were constructed from T1- and T2-weighted MRI. The finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the individual electric fields, which were registered to the standard space using surface based registration. Motor cortical and frontal tDCS were modelled for 16 electrode montages. For each electrode montage, the group-level electric fields had a consistent strength and direction in several brain regions, which could also be located at some distance from the electrodes. In other regions, the electric fields were more variable, and thus more likely to produce variable effects in each individual. Both the anode and cathode locations affected the group-level electric fields, both directly under the electrodes and elsewhere. For motor cortical tDCS, the electric fields could be controlled at the group level by moving the electrodes. However, for frontal tDCS, the group-level electric fields were more variable, and the electrode locations had only minor effects on the group average fields. Our results reveal the electric fields and their variability at the group level in the standard brain space, providing insights into the mechanisms of tDCS for plasticity induction. The data are useful for planning, analysing and interpreting tDCS studies.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27188218     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  Neural predictors of treatment response to brain stimulation and psychological therapy in depression: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Camilla L Nord; D Chamith Halahakoon; Tarun Limbachya; Caroline Charpentier; Níall Lally; Vincent Walsh; Judy Leibowitz; Stephen Pilling; Jonathan P Roiser
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Poststimulation time interval-dependent effects of motor cortex anodal tDCS on reaction-time task performance.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; José R Alameda Bailén; Tamara Garrido Béjar; Macarena García López; Inmaculada Jaén Rodríguez; Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida; Silvia Pérez Panal; Gloria González Ángel; Laura Lemus Corchero; María J Ruiz Vega; Michael A Nitsche; Guadalupe N Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Catecholaminergic modulation of indices of cognitive flexibility: A pharmaco-tDCS study.

Authors:  Olivia Dennison; Jie Gao; Lee Wei Lim; Charlotte J Stagg; Luca Aquili
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances behavioral and EEG markers of proactive control.

Authors:  Megan Boudewyn; Brooke M Roberts; Eda Mizrak; Charan Ranganath; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.065

5.  Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline.

Authors:  Erik G Lee; Priyam Rastogi; Ravi L Hadimani; David C Jiles; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  i-SATA: A MATLAB based toolbox to estimate current density generated by transcranial direct current stimulation in an individual brain.

Authors:  Rajan Kashyap; Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Ramaswamy Arumugam; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; Sh Annabel Chen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the opercular somatosensory region does not influence experimentally induced pain: a triple blind, sham-controlled study.

Authors:  Soichiro Koyama; Kei Nakagawa; Satoshi Tanaka
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Polarity-independent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the bilateral opercular somatosensory region: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Kei Nakagawa; Soichiro Koyama; Koji Inui; Satoshi Tanaka; Ryusuke Kakigi; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Affect Lower Extremity Muscle Strength Training in Healthy Individuals: A Triple-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Kazuhei Maeda; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Tsuyoshi Tatemoto; Kunitsugu Kondo; Yohei Otaka; Satoshi Tanaka
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Concurrent measurement of cerebral hemodynamics and electroencephalography during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Martina Giovannella; David Ibañez; Clara Gregori-Pla; Michal Kacprzak; Guillem Mitjà; Giulio Ruffini; Turgut Durduran
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.593

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.