PURPOSE: Emerging literature suggests that physical activity and fitness may have a positive effect on cognitive and mental health in adolescents. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of two high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols for improving cognitive and mental health outcomes (executive function, psychological well-being, psychological distress, and physical self-concept) in adolescents. METHODS:Participants (n = 65; mean age = 15.8 ± 0.6 yr) were randomized to three conditions: aerobic exercise program (AEP; n = 21), resistance and aerobic program (RAP; n = 22), and control (n = 22). HIIT sessions (8-10 min per session) were delivered during physical education lessons or at lunchtime three times per week for 8 wk. Assessments were conducted at baseline and immediately postintervention to detect changes in executive function (trail making test), psychological well-being, psychological distress, and physical self-description by researchers blinded to treatment allocation. Intervention effects were examined using linear mixed models. Cohen's d effect sizes and clinical inference were also calculated. RESULTS: While results were not significant, small improvements in executive function (mean change (95% CI) -6.69 (-22.03, 8.64), d = -0.32) and psychological well-being (mean change (95% CI) 2.81 (-2.06, 7.68), d = 0.34) were evident in the AEP group; and moderate improvements in executive function (mean change (95% CI) -10.73 (-26.22, 4.76), d = -0.51), and small improvements in well-being (mean change (95% CI) 2.96 (-1.82, 7.75), d = 0.36) and perceived appearance (mean change (95% CI) 0.32 (-0.25, 0.86), d = 0.35), were observed for the RAP group. Mean feeling state scores improved from preworkout to postworkout in both HIIT conditions, with significant results for the AEP (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of embedding HIIT within the school day for improving cognitive and mental health among adolescents.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Emerging literature suggests that physical activity and fitness may have a positive effect on cognitive and mental health in adolescents. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of two high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols for improving cognitive and mental health outcomes (executive function, psychological well-being, psychological distress, and physical self-concept) in adolescents. METHODS:Participants (n = 65; mean age = 15.8 ± 0.6 yr) were randomized to three conditions: aerobic exercise program (AEP; n = 21), resistance and aerobic program (RAP; n = 22), and control (n = 22). HIIT sessions (8-10 min per session) were delivered during physical education lessons or at lunchtime three times per week for 8 wk. Assessments were conducted at baseline and immediately postintervention to detect changes in executive function (trail making test), psychological well-being, psychological distress, and physical self-description by researchers blinded to treatment allocation. Intervention effects were examined using linear mixed models. Cohen's d effect sizes and clinical inference were also calculated. RESULTS: While results were not significant, small improvements in executive function (mean change (95% CI) -6.69 (-22.03, 8.64), d = -0.32) and psychological well-being (mean change (95% CI) 2.81 (-2.06, 7.68), d = 0.34) were evident in the AEP group; and moderate improvements in executive function (mean change (95% CI) -10.73 (-26.22, 4.76), d = -0.51), and small improvements in well-being (mean change (95% CI) 2.96 (-1.82, 7.75), d = 0.36) and perceived appearance (mean change (95% CI) 0.32 (-0.25, 0.86), d = 0.35), were observed for the RAP group. Mean feeling state scores improved from preworkout to postworkout in both HIIT conditions, with significant results for the AEP (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of embedding HIIT within the school day for improving cognitive and mental health among adolescents.
Authors: María Rodriguez-Ayllon; Cristina Cadenas-Sánchez; Fernando Estévez-López; Nicolas E Muñoz; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Jairo H Migueles; Pablo Molina-García; Hanna Henriksson; Alejandra Mena-Molina; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno; Andrés Catena; Marie Löf; Kirk I Erickson; David R Lubans; Francisco B Ortega; Irene Esteban-Cornejo Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Angus A Leahy; Sarah G Kennedy; Jordan J Smith; Narelle Eather; James Boyer; Matthew Thomas; Nora Shields; Ben Dascombe; David R Lubans Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-06-04
Authors: David R Lubans; Chris Lonsdale; Kristen Cohen; Narelle Eather; Mark R Beauchamp; Philip J Morgan; Benjamin D Sylvester; Jordan J Smith Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Ana R Alves; Renata Dias; Henrique P Neiva; Daniel A Marinho; Mário C Marques; António C Sousa; Vânia Loureiro; Nuno Loureiro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Arilson F M de Sousa; André R Medeiros; Stefano Benitez-Flores; Sebastián Del Rosso; Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen; Daniel A Boullosa Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 4.566