Literature DB >> 27185504

A data-driven concept schema for defining clinical research data needs.

Gregory W Hruby1, Julia Hoxha1, Praveen Chandar Ravichandran1, Eneida A Mendonça2, David A Hanauer3, Chunhua Weng4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Patient, Intervention, Control/Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework is an effective technique for framing a clinical question. We aim to develop the counterpart of PICO to structure clinical research data needs.
METHODS: We use a data-driven approach to abstracting key concepts representing clinical research data needs by adapting and extending an expert-derived framework originally developed for defining cancer research data needs. We annotated clinical trial eligibility criteria, EHR data request logs, and data queries to electronic health records (EHR), to extract and harmonize concept classes representing clinical research data needs. We evaluated the class coverage, class preservation from the original framework, schema generalizability, schema understandability, and schema structural correctness through a semi-structured interview with eight multidisciplinary domain experts. We iteratively refined the schema based on the evaluations.
RESULTS: Our data-driven schema preserved 68% of the 63 classes from the original framework and covered 88% (73/82) of the classes proposed by evaluators. Class coverage for participants of different backgrounds ranged from 60% to 100% with a median value of 95% agreement among the individual evaluators. The schema was found understandable and structurally sound.
CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed schema may serve as the counterpart to PICO for improving the research data needs communication between researchers and informaticians.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative effectiveness research; Data collection; Medical informatics; Models; Needs assessment; Theoretical

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27185504      PMCID: PMC4873775          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  18 in total

1.  caCORE: a common infrastructure for cancer informatics.

Authors:  Peter A Covitz; Frank Hartel; Carl Schaefer; Sherri De Coronado; Gilberto Fragoso; Himanso Sahni; Scott Gustafson; Kenneth H Buetow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A centralized research data repository enhances retrospective outcomes research capacity: a case report.

Authors:  Gregory William Hruby; James McKiernan; Suzanne Bakken; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Inter-observer reliability assessments in time motion studies: the foundation for meaningful clinical workflow analysis.

Authors:  Marcelo A Lopetegui; Shasha Bai; Po-Yin Yen; Albert Lai; Peter Embi; Philip R O Payne
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

4.  Understanding data requirements of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Edna C Shenvi; Daniella Meeker; Aziz A Boxwala
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needs.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Anne-Marie Meyer; Amy P Abernethy; Til Stürmer; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Jon D Duke; Nigam H Shah; Christian G Reich; Vojtech Huser; Martijn J Schuemie; Marc A Suchard; Rae Woong Park; Ian Chi Kei Wong; Peter R Rijnbeek; Johan van der Lei; Nicole Pratt; G Niklas Norén; Yu-Chuan Li; Paul E Stang; David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

7.  Cancer informatics vision: caBIG.

Authors:  Andrew C von Eschenbach; Kenneth Buetow
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-06

8.  Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions.

Authors:  Connie Schardt; Martha B Adams; Thomas Owens; Sheri Keitz; Paul Fontelo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Toward a cognitive task analysis for biomedical query mediation.

Authors:  Gregory W Hruby; James J Cimino; Vimla Patel; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2014-04-07

10.  Characterization of the biomedical query mediation process.

Authors:  Gregory W Hruby; Mary Regina Boland; James J Cimino; Junfeng Gao; Adam B Wilcox; Julia Hirschberg; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Junghwan Lee; Ziheng Zhou; Ying Kuen Cheung; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Schema Playground: A tool for authoring, extending, and using metadata schemas to improve FAIRness of biomedical data.

Authors:  Marco Cano; Ginger Tsueng; Xinghua Zhou; Laura D Hughes; Julia L Mullen; Jiwen Xin; Andrew I Su; Chunlei Wu
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Discovering Clinical Information Models Online to Promote Interoperability of Electronic Health Records: A Feasibility Study of OpenEHR.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Xiaoshuo Huang; Jiao Li
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Structured Data Capture for Oncology.

Authors:  Alexander K Goel; Walter Scott Campbell; Richard Moldwin
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.