Literature DB >> 27185376

Effects of human serum and apo-Transferrin on Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A biofilm formation.

Pengfei She1, Lihua Chen1, Yong Qi1, Huan Xu1, Yuan Liu1, Yangxia Wang2, Zhen Luo1, Yong Wu1.   

Abstract

Biofilm-associated Staphylococcus epidermidis infections present clinically important features due to their high levels of resistance to traditional antibiotics. As a part of human innate immune system, serum shows different degrees of protection against systemic S. epidermidis infection. We investigated the ability of human serum as well as serum component to inhibit the formation of, and eradication of mature S. epidermidis biofilms. In addition, the synergistic effect of vancomycin combined with apo-Transferrin was checked. Human serum exhibited significant antibiofilm activities against S. epidermidis at the concentration without affecting planktonic cell growth. However, there was no effect of human serum on established biofilms. By component separation, we observed that antibiofilm effect of serum components mainly due to the proteins could be damaged by heat inactivation (e.g., complement) or heat-stable proteins ≥100 kDa. In addition, serum apo-Transferrin showed modest antibiofilm effect, but without influence on S. epidermidis initial adhesion. And there was a synergistic antibiofilm interaction between vancomycin and apo-Transferrin against S. epidermidis. Our results indicate that serum or its components (heat-inactivated components or heat-stable proteins ≥100 kDa) could inhibits S. epidermidis biofilm formation. Besides, apo-Transferrin could partially reduce the biofilm formation at the concentration that does not inhibit planktonic cell growth.
© 2016 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Staphylococcus epidermidiszzm321990; zzm321990XTT.zzm321990; Apo-Transferrin; biofilm; crystal violet; serum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27185376      PMCID: PMC5221445          DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiologyopen        ISSN: 2045-8827            Impact factor:   3.139


Introduction

Bacterial biofilms are organized communities containing lots of densely packed cells (Prindle et al. 2015). Microorganisms within biofilms are less susceptible to antimicrobial treatment than their planktonic counterparts (Nuryastuti et al. 2009). The hardiness of biofilms and their resistance to current antibiotics as well as host immune clearance mechanisms has led to a growing problem in healthcare settings (Nithyanand et al. 2015). Staphylococcus epidermidis, a member of the group of coagulase‐negative staphylococci, belongs to the commensal skin flora of every human individual (Chen et al. 2015). Staphylococcus epidermidis is today one of the most important bacteria related to hospital acquired infection, and has been known for many years as a leading cause of infections related to indwelling medical devices such as vascular catheters, prosthetic joints, and artificial heart valves (Vuong and Otto 2002; Hall‐Stoodley et al. 2004). This is related, in part, to the organism's ability to adhere to biotic or abiotic surfaces and form biofilms (Oliveira et al. 2007). Although some plasma proteins such as fibronectin, fibrinogen, and thrombospondin have a propensity to enhance bacterial adhesion to surfaces coated with these proteins (Hermann et al. 1991; Nilsson et al. 1998; Chia et al. 2000), recent studies have revealed a strong inhibition of biofilm formation on biomaterials in the presence of whole serum (Ardehali et al. 2002; Ardehali et al. 2003; Abraham and Jefferson 2010; Hammond et al. 2010; Naves et al. 2010; del Prado et al. 2010; Samaranayake et al. 2013; Ding et al. 2014; Wuren et al. 2014). These observations prompted an investigation of the role of serum proteins, for example, transferring (Ardehali et al. 2003; Artini et al. 2012), in biofilm inhibition. However, there is scant systematic research about the role played by human serum (HS) or its constituents in S. epidermidis biofilm growth. Although some studies found that apo‐Transferrin (apoTf, the iron depleted form of Transferrin) but not holo‐Transferrin (apoTf, the iron loaded form of Transferrin) do have ability to inhibit bacterial adhesion (Ardehali et al. 2003; Artini et al. 2012), there is no evidence whether there is a synergistic effects when combining the apoTf with vancomycin. To determine the effect of human serum on the development of S. epidermidis biofilms, we characterized planktonic as well as biofilm growth with and without human serum. Then, we determined which serum components play a leading role in biofilm inhibition by removing or dividing the serum protein component. In addition, we verified the effect of transferrin on S. epidermidis biofilm inhibition, and evaluated the synergistic effects of transferrin combined with vancomycin.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains, growth media, and reagents

Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A (ATCC35984) was kindly provided by Di Qu (Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China). Pure stock cultures were maintained at −80°C in 30% (vol/vol) frozen glycerol solution. Bacteria were subcultured on blood agar plates overnight at 37°C. LB medium was used for bacterial culture in all experiments unless otherwise specified. Human albumin, apoTf, and holo‐Tf (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were used and dissolved in distilled water. The absorbance (A) was measured by a spectrophotometer (Bio‐Tek, USA).

Preparation of human serum

Human blood was donated by volunteers, who reported that they took no medication of any type for at least 10 days before the venipuncture. Serum was separated from the solid clot and was then centrifuged at 1200g for 15 min, and the supernatant was passed through a sterile syringe filter (Millipore Millex‐GP, USA) with pore size of 0.22 μm. And the filtrate was stored at −20°C until further use.

Biofilm determination

To detect the inhibitory effect of HS or Transferrin (apoTf and holo‐Tf) on biofilm formation of S. epidermidis RP62A, the semiquantitative determination of biofilm formation was performed in microtiter plates as described earlier, with minor modifications (Nesse et al. 2015). Four μL culture and 196 μL LB with or without the HS or Transferrin to be tested were added to each well in 96‐well cell culture plates (Corning/Costar, USA), and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. And 1.5 mg/mL bicarbonate was added to Transferrin to eliminate the possible iron of LB prior to usage when needed. Biofilm formation was determined by a crystal violet (CV) and XTT assays. Crystal violet was used as indicator of total biofilm biomass. Briefly, biofilm was washed gently and stained with 0.5% (w/v) crystal violet solution. After staining, the plates were washed again and 200 μL of 95% ethanol was added to dissolve stained dye, the absorbance was measured at 570 nm. XTT can be converted to a colored formazan salt in the presence of metabolic activity, which was applied to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. Briefly, after exposure to HS or Transferrin, biofilms were washed, then 200 μL of a solution containing 200 mg/L of XTT and 20 mg/L of PMS (phenazine methosulfate) was added to each well. The microtiter plates were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in the dark. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm (Gomes et al. 2009). For the mature biofilm disassembly valuation, primarily the mature biofilm was allowed to form as follows: a volume of 100 μL of 1:200 diluted overnight bacterial culture was added to a 96‐well cell culture plate with LB and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Later the wells were washed with 0.9% saline and HS was incorporated into LB to different concentrations. The plate was incubated for another 24 h and biofilm biomass was determined by CV and XTT assays as described earlier.

Planktonic cell growth

The planktonic cell growth assay was modified from Huang and Li as described previously (Huang et al. 2014). Overnight grown S. epidermidis RP62A (optical density at 630 nm was adjusted to 0.45 with LB; 5 × 107 CFU/mL) cells were diluted 1:100 in LB with 0%, 5%, 10%, 25%, and 50% HS, and at the same time we set 3 μg/mL vancomycin (the MBC of S. epidermidis RP62A) as a positive control. These samples were then grown in 50 mL centrifugal tubes (Corning/Costar, USA) at 37°C with agitation (160 rpm) for 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively. After incubation, 200 μL culture medium was carefully transferred to another microtiter plate. The planktonic culture turbidity was read at 630 nm by a spectrophotometer.

HS component separation

Heat‐inactivated serum was prepared by heating at 56°C for 30 min to inactivate complement and other heat‐inactivated components (HS‐Heated) (Ayache et al. 2006). Proteinase K‐treated serum (HS‐Proteinase) was prepared by incubating with 25 mg/mL proteinase K at 58°C for 1 h followed by incubation at 85°C for 1 h to inactivate the protease. On the other hand, proteins in HS were separated into two fractions, one containing proteins ≥100 kDa and the other containing proteins <100 kDa, using Amicon® Ultra‐4 centrifugal filter devices (Millipore). All fractions were filter sterilized (0.22 μm pore size filter) (Ding et al. 2014). Positive and negative controls were prepared in LB with (5%) or without HS, respectively. The effects of these serum components on S. epidermidis formation were valuated by CV and XTT assays as described earlier.

Effect of HS and apo‐Tf on S. epidermidis biofilm morphology

The cover slides were disinfected by soaking them into 75% ethanol for 30 min, followed by successive washes with distilled water using a syringe. After drying, the cover slides were placed into 6‐well cell culture plates with 2 mL HS or apoTf at designed concentration containing 40 μL overnight grown S. epidermidis (optical density at 630 nm was adjusted to 0.45 with LB). After 24 h incubation, the culture media was removed and the cover slides were washed three times with 0.9% saline, then the cover slides were stained with CV as described earlier. The biofilm was visualized and photographed with a light microscope (Olympus CX31, Tokyo, Japan) at 10 × 40 magnification. For mature biofilm disassembly valuation, 24‐h biofilms were treated with or without HS for another 24 h, and were photographed with the microscope.

Initial adhesion assay

Experiment was conducted based on the method previously described by Santiago et al. (2015). A 96‐well microtiter plate was prepared with apoTf at the concentration of 5 mg/mL. Aliquots of S. epidermidis suspension (adjusted to 0.5 McFarland) were added to these wells. The plate was incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Following incubation, the wells were washed with saline, and biomass of cell attachment was determined by CV assay as described earlier.

Synergy testing of apo‐Tf with vancomycin

Staphylococcus epidermidis strain (1 × 105 CFU/200 μL) in LB was incubated at 37°C for 24 h with sub‐MIC VAN (0.0313 μg/mL) and apoTf (4 mg/mL) alone and in combination in 96‐well cell culture plates and the biomass of biofilm cells was measured by CV assay as described earlier.

Statistical analysis

Data were described as mean ± SD. Differences between groups were examined for statistical significance using Student's t test or one‐way analysis of variance. All statistical analyses were performed by Graph Pad Prim 6.0 software. The data means were considered to be different at P < 0.05. All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.

Results

HS treatment reduces biofilm formation, but has no effect on established biofilms

The previously established biofilm assays (CV and XTT assay) were used to evaluate the ability of HS to prevent biofilm formation and disperse established S. epidermidis biofilms. CV assay showed that HS started to inhibit S. epidermidis biofilm formation at the concentration ≥1%. More specifically, in the presence of 1–5% HS, biofilm formation was reduced to 50–60% compared to control. And HS almost completely inhibit S. epidermidis biofilm formation at the concentration ≥10% (Figs. 1A and C and 3A). In accordance with the CV assay, quantitative analysis using XTT assay revealed that HS at the concentration ≥1% significantly attenuated metabolic activity due to biofilm inhibition by HS (Figs. 1B and C and 3A). We then tested the effects of HS on 24‐h mature biofilm, but it had no effect on established biofilms in our assay conditions up to 100% (Figs. 2A–C and 3B).
Figure 1

Human serum (HS) inhibits Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm formation. Overnight culture was treated with 0–100% HS at 37°C for 24 h. The volume of biofilm was determined by CV assay (A, C) and by XTT assay (B, C). *P < 0.05 versus untreated control, and error bars indicate SD. CV, crystal violet.

Figure 2

Human serum (HS) has no effect on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 mature biofilm eradication. Twenty‐four‐hour mature biofilms were cultured overnight with HS at concentrations ranging from 0% to 100% at 37°C for another 24 h and the quantification of biofilm biomass determined by CV assay (A, C) and by XTT assay (B, C). Error bars indicate SD. CV, crystal violet.

Figure 3

Optical micrographs showing the effects of human serum (HS) on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm formation (A) and eradication (B). Representative images (magnification, 10 × 40) of biofilm was treated with different concentrations of HS, and the effects of HS were assessed by crystal violet staining.

Human serum (HS) inhibits Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm formation. Overnight culture was treated with 0–100% HS at 37°C for 24 h. The volume of biofilm was determined by CV assay (A, C) and by XTT assay (B, C). *P < 0.05 versus untreated control, and error bars indicate SD. CV, crystal violet. Human serum (HS) has no effect on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 mature biofilm eradication. Twenty‐four‐hour mature biofilms were cultured overnight with HS at concentrations ranging from 0% to 100% at 37°C for another 24 h and the quantification of biofilm biomass determined by CV assay (A, C) and by XTT assay (B, C). Error bars indicate SD. CV, crystal violet. Optical micrographs showing the effects of human serum (HS) on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm formation (A) and eradication (B). Representative images (magnification, 10 × 40) of biofilm was treated with different concentrations of HS, and the effects of HS were assessed by crystal violet staining.

Effect of HS on planktonic growth of S. epidermidis

Figure 4 depicts the effect of different HS concentrations on planktonic cells of S. epidermidis RP62A. HS concentrations below 25% did not affect the planktonic cell growth, concentrations greater than 50% partially inhibited bacterial growth, which confirmed that inhibition of biofilm formation was not due solely to growth inhibition.
Figure 4

Planktonic cell growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 in the presence of human serum (HS). As a control, the concentration of VAN is 3 μg/mL which is equal to the MBC we tested in this study. Results are representative of three experiments, error bars indicate SD.

Planktonic cell growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 in the presence of human serum (HS). As a control, the concentration of VAN is 3 μg/mL which is equal to the MBC we tested in this study. Results are representative of three experiments, error bars indicate SD.

Characterization of the inhibitory components

To further study the components of HS that inhibit the biofilm formation of S. epidermidis, we heated the serum at 56°C for 30 min to inactivate heat‐unstable components (Ayache et al. 2006). We found that the removal of heat‐unstable components in serum reduced ~ 43.48% (for CV assay) and ~57.14% (for XTT assay) inhibitory activity of serum, respectively, when compared with 5% HS‐treated group, which suggests that heat‐unstable components (e.g., complement) contributes modestly to the inhibition of S. epidermidis biofilm formation. Then, to investigate whether the rest of the part of the inhibitory activity is due to other heat‐stable proteins in serum, proteinase K was used to degrade proteins in the heat‐inactivated HS, and the inhibitory activity completely disappeared. We then separated the HS proteins by a membrane fractionation. In this process, the traction retained by the membrane contains all proteins with a MW of ≥100 kDa, while the pass‐through fraction contains all proteins with a MW of <100 kDa. As shown in Figure 5, most inhibitory effect of HS resides within the fractions containing proteins ≥100 kDa. However, the fraction containing proteins of <100 kDa still produced a significant reduction. Together, these results support the possibility that HS contains multiple factors that interfere with S. epidermidis biofilm formation.
Figure 5

The inhibitory effect of human serum (HS) on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm can be fractionated. Complement (C) and protein (Pro) were removed from HS, respectively. Besides, HS was divided into two fractions, one containing proteins ≤100 Da and the other containing proteins >100 kDa. The effects of those fractions on the formation of S. epidermidis biofilm were examined by CV assay (A, C) and by XTT assay (B, C). *P < 0.05 versus untreated control; ▼P < 0.05 versus 5% HS‐treated group, and error bars indicate SD. CV, crystal violet.

The inhibitory effect of human serum (HS) on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm can be fractionated. Complement (C) and protein (Pro) were removed from HS, respectively. Besides, HS was divided into two fractions, one containing proteins ≤100 Da and the other containing proteins >100 kDa. The effects of those fractions on the formation of S. epidermidis biofilm were examined by CV assay (A, C) and by XTT assay (B, C). *P < 0.05 versus untreated control; ▼P < 0.05 versus 5% HS‐treated group, and error bars indicate SD. CV, crystal violet.

Effect of transferrin on S. epidermidis biofilm formation

Once it was determined that apoTf was the major component in the protein pool of serum exhibiting the inhibitory activity (Ardehali et al. 2003), biofilm inhibition assay (CV assay) was performed in the presence of purified protein apoTf and holo‐Tf. The inhibitory effect of apoTf was diminished at the concentration <5.21 mg/mL. The presence of apoTf at the concentrations between 5.21 and 41.67 mg/mL yielded dose‐dependent inhibition of S. epidermidis biofilm in this concentration range, however, holo‐Tf cannot inhibit S. epidermidis biofilm formation even at high dose (Fig. 6A and B). On the other hand, adding bicarbonate (1.5 mg/mL) into apoTf cannot change the inhibitory effect of apoTf indicating that the iron ion in the LB may have no impact on the inhibitory effect of apoTf (Fig. 6C). In consistence of the results above, the inhibition of biofilm formation was not due solely to growth inhibition. As is shown in Figure 6D, time–growth curves indicated that the presence of apoTf at the concentration ≤10 mg/mL did not significantly affect the growth of S. epidermidis. So we chose 5 mg/mL apoTf as a measure of the inhibitory effect of apoTf on S. epidermidis bacterial initial adhesion. Although apoTf showed significant inhibitory effect on biofilm formation of S. epidermidis, it had no inhibitory effect on bacterial initial adhesion (Fig. 6E). These results together would suggest that the inhibitory effect of HS on S. epidermidis biofilm formation was not mainly, but partially due to the presence of apoTf; however, it had no effect on initial bacterial adhesion.
Figure 6

Effects of the HS component transferrin on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984. (A) Biofilm formation by S. epidermidis in the presence of apo‐Tf and holo‐Tf at the concentration ranging from 0 to 41.67 mg/mL. *P < 0.05 versus untreated control, and error bars indicate SD. (B) Apo‐Tf can inhibit biofilm formation on coverslips. (C) Effects of bicarbonate on the inhibitory effect of apo‐Tf. (D) Effects of apo‐Tf on S. epidermidis planktonic cell growth. Error bars indicate SD. (E) apo‐Tf has no effects on bacterial attachment. ns, P > 0.05. HS, human serum

Effects of the HS component transferrin on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984. (A) Biofilm formation by S. epidermidis in the presence of apoTf and holo‐Tf at the concentration ranging from 0 to 41.67 mg/mL. *P < 0.05 versus untreated control, and error bars indicate SD. (B) ApoTf can inhibit biofilm formation on coverslips. (C) Effects of bicarbonate on the inhibitory effect of apoTf. (D) Effects of apoTf on S. epidermidis planktonic cell growth. Error bars indicate SD. (E) apoTf has no effects on bacterial attachment. ns, P > 0.05. HS, human serum

Synergistic effect between VAN and apo‐Tf on S. epidermidis biofilm formation

To assess the synergistic effects between VAN and apoTf on S. epidermidis biofilm formation, S. epidermidis was exposed to combinations of these agents and their viability was examined by CV assay. The result of the combination assay was presented in Figure 7. We found that VAN at subminimal inhibitory concentration (0.0313 μg/mL) almost had no effect on S. epidermidis biofilm formation (P > 0.05). However, apoTf could cause ~20% reduction in biofilm formation at the concentration of 4 mg/mL. We then tested whether there was a synergistic effect between VAN and apoTf on S. epidermidis biofilm formation. Following 24 h of apoTf combining sub‐MIC VAN treatment, there was ~43% reduction in biofilm formation compared to the only sub‐MIC VAN treatment group. These results suggest that there was a synergistic effect on inhibition of S. epidermidis biofilm formation between sub‐MIC VAN and apoTf.
Figure 7

Effect of VAN with and without transferrin on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984. The graph presents biofilm biomass (%) for the strain grown in LB broth (control) or in LB broth amended with subinhibitory concentrations (sub‐MIC) of VAN or apo‐Tf (4 mg/mL) or both of them (apo‐Tf + sub‐MIC). Statistically significant differences are indicated for each sample treated with apo‐Tf alone or apo‐Tf combined with sub‐MIC VAN compared to the control and sample treated with sub‐MIC VAN only (*P < 0.05). Error bars represent SD.

Effect of VAN with and without transferrin on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984. The graph presents biofilm biomass (%) for the strain grown in LB broth (control) or in LB broth amended with subinhibitory concentrations (sub‐MIC) of VAN or apoTf (4 mg/mL) or both of them (apoTf + sub‐MIC). Statistically significant differences are indicated for each sample treated with apoTf alone or apoTf combined with sub‐MIC VAN compared to the control and sample treated with sub‐MIC VAN only (*P < 0.05). Error bars represent SD.

Discussion

To make the transition from a commensal organism to a systemic pathogen, S. epidermidis must first enter the blood stream. In such circumstance, S. epidermidis is exposed to the innate immune defenses. As a part of human innate immune system, serum and its components show different degrees of protection against systemic S. epidermidis infection (Kojic and Darouiche 2004; Ding et al. 2014). In this work, we demonstrated that HS blocks S. epidermidis RP62A biofilm formation at concentrations without limiting bacterial growth. And fractionation analysis indicates that the major components that interfere with biofilm formation are heat‐inactivated components and heat‐stable proteins ≥100 kDa in size. We then tested the antibiofilm effect of apoTf, which was reported to be the most important component in biofilm inhibition (Ardehali et al. 2003). Although the effects of apoTf on S. epidermidis RP62A biofilm formation was similar to that reported by other investigations (Ardehali et al. 2003; Artini et al. 2012), higher concentrations of apoTf were required in our experiment; besides, apoTf shows no effect on S. epidermidis initial attachment at the antibiofilm concentration. We further showed that apoTf can potentiate VAN susceptibility in biofilm inhibition. To our knowledge, there are no studies demonstrating the synergistic antibiofilm effect between apoTf and VAN, which could be used to guide the use of antibiotics. Previous studies found that some plasma proteins have the ability to promote biofilm formation (Hermann et al. 1991; Nilsson et al. 1998; Chia et al. 2000), but recent studies have investigated a strong inhibition of adherence of various bacterium to biotic or abiotic substances in the presence of whole serum (Ardehali et al. 2002, 2003; Abraham and Jefferson 2010; Hammond et al. 2010; Naves et al. 2010; del Prado et al. 2010; Samaranayake et al. 2013; Ding et al. 2014; Wuren et al. 2014). However, the effects of serum on yeast strains are varied. In pioneering investigations, serum could promote the growth of various Aspergillus spp. (Wuren et al. 2014); besides, abiotic surfaces preconditioned with body fluids such as serum and saliva promote increased yeast colonization and biofilm growth of Candida albicans (Nikawa et al. 2000; Samaranayake et al. 2013) and potentiates the expression of genes associated with antifungal drug resistance (Samaranayake et al. 2015), but some studies found that serum could inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation (Ding et al. 2014). In consensus with previous studies in bacteria, we demonstrate that HS could inhibit biofilm formation in S. epidermidis. In search of the inhibitory component, serum was fractionated and analyses of the protein pools indicated that the major portion of the biofilm inhibitory activity of serum appears to be heat‐inactivated components and proteins ≥100 kDa in size. The heat‐inactivated components contains complement and some soluble factors (Ayache et al. 2006), and the ≥100 kDa fraction mainly contains immunoglobulins (150 kDa), C‐reactive protein (105 kDa), and ceruloplasmin (150 kDa) (Hammond et al. 2010). Moreover, Abraham and Jefferson (2010) found that a low‐molecular‐weight component of HS inhibits biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus, and the component was protease resistant and heat stable. A similar circumstance was previously described by Hammond et al. (2010), who examined the effects of HS on biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and they described that serum albumin played a critical role in inhibition of PAO1 biofilm formation. Although our studies found that both complement and total protein of serum had inhibitory effect on S. epidermidis biofilm formation, there was no effect of serum albumin on S. epidermidis biofilm formation (Fig. 8) probably because of the different strains and culture conditions and serotypes sources. To confirm this hypothesis, future studies are needed to identify this component of human serum.
Figure 8

Effect of albumin on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm formation. Error bars indicate SD.

Effect of albumin on Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC35984 biofilm formation. Error bars indicate SD. Within the body, most of the extracellular iron is complexed by the serum glycoprotein, transferrin, that serves to transport iron from areas of supply to areas of need; transferrin is one of the most common serum component, is a monomeric glycoprotein structurally divided in two lobes, each capable of binding one iron III ion. The iron depleted form is named apoTf, while the iron loaded form is named holo‐Tf (Adlerova et al. 2008). Transferrin has been shown to exert both a bacteriostatic and bactericidal effect in vitro on a variety of pathogens (Adlerova et al. 2008; Artini et al. 2012), and some investigations have revealed that transferrin has the effects on bacterial adhesion inhibition (Ardehali et al. 2003; Artini et al. 2012), but the inhibition of bacterial adhesion by serum is largely due to the presence of apoTf, the iron deficient form of transferrin. On the contrary, the presence of holo‐Tf, the iron saturated form of transferrin, did not prevent bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces (Brindle et al. 2011). Similar to the previous study, we found that apoTf but not holo‐Tf could to some extent inhibit biofilm formation, but the higher concentration was required in vitro. On the other hand, we found that there are no effects of apoTf on initial adherence of S. epidermidis. The reason for this could be the differences in the S. epidermidis strains used, and the incubation medium they used. Moreover, there are so many different components in the serum, and there may be a synergistic effect of apoTf with other serum components in vivo, we cannot exclude the effect of apoTf on inhibition of biofilm at physiological concentration. There are two major steps in biofilm formation: (1) initial adhesion to biotic and abiotic substances and (2) cell–cell interaction (Mack et al. 2004). Initial adhesion and growth of microorganisms on the surface of an implant can be the most critical event in the development of device‐associated infection (Ardehali et al. 2003). The percentage of bacterial cell‐surface attachment is directly proportional to the final mass of biofilm formed. Although apoTf was found to suppress S. epidermidis biofilm production, it has no effect on S. epidermidis initial adhesion. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that there is a synergistic inhibitory effect on S. epidermidis RP62A biofilm formation for the combination of apoTf with VAN. Antibiofilm activity in vitro depends on many factors such as the different strains used, culture conditions, and the medium used. Thus, we cannot draw any definitive conclusions on the basis of the results of this study. However, the new findings shown here should provide important clues for further study of the efficacy of combination therapy for biofilm‐forming S. epidermidis. Taken together, our results indicate that in vitro HS significantly inhibit S. epidermidis biofilm formation due to the heat‐inactivated components and heat‐stable proteins <100 kDa in serum. Besides, apoTf has partially antibioiflm effect and has synergistic effect with VAN in S. epidermidis biofilm inhibition. However, the inhibition profile of serum and its components under laboratory growth conditions may not be representative of in vivo conditions due to the complex and dynamic environment within the host. The observations of this study, however, will be useful as important base data for such future studies.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.
  31 in total

1.  The effect of apo-transferrin on bacterial adhesion to biomaterials.

Authors:  Reza Ardehali; Lei Shi; Jarmila Janatova; S Fazal Mohammad; Gregory L Burns
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 2.  Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases.

Authors:  Luanne Hall-Stoodley; J William Costerton; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Effects of human serum albumin, ibuprofen and N-acetyl-L-cysteine against biofilm formation by pathogenic Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  P Naves; G del Prado; L Huelves; V Rodríguez-Cerrato; V Ruiz; M C Ponte; F Soriano
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Identification of a fibronectin binding protein from Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  J S Chia; C Y Yeh; J Y Chen
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Mechanisms of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus: functional molecules, regulatory circuits, and adaptive responses.

Authors:  Dietrich Mack; Petra Becker; Indranil Chatterjee; Sabine Dobinsky; Johannes K M Knobloch; Georg Peters; Holger Rohde; Mathias Herrmann
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 6.  Staphylococcus epidermidis infections.

Authors:  Cuong Vuong; Michael Otto
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.700

7.  Human serum potentiates the expression of genes associated with antifungal drug resistance in C. albicans biofilms on central venous catheters.

Authors:  L P Samaranayake; S Anil; M Hashem; S Vellappally; B P K Cheung
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 8.  Candida infections of medical devices.

Authors:  Erna M Kojic; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Effects of Nicotine on Streptococcus gordonii Growth, Biofilm Formation, and Cell Aggregation.

Authors:  R Huang; M Li; M Ye; K Yang; X Xu; R L Gregory
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Serum inhibits P. aeruginosa biofilm formation on plastic surfaces and intravenous catheters.

Authors:  Adrienne Hammond; Janet Dertien; Jane A Colmer-Hamood; John A Griswold; Abdul N Hamood
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  7 in total

1.  Determinants for persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitals: interplay between resistance, virulence and biofilm formation.

Authors:  S J Kaiser; N T Mutters; A DeRosa; C Ewers; U Frank; F Günther
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Interdependence between iron acquisition and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Donghoon Kang; Natalia V Kirienko
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.422

3.  Titanium Kirschner Wires Resist Biofilms Better Than Stainless Steel and Hydroxyapatite-coated Wires: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  James P McEvoy; Philip Martin; Arshad Khaleel; Shobana Dissanayeke
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2019 May-Aug

4.  Contributions of the oligopeptide permeases in multistep of Vibrio alginolyticus pathogenesis.

Authors:  Wenjia Liu; Lixing Huang; Yongquan Su; Yingxue Qin; Lingmin Zhao; Qingpi Yan
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Regulatory role of the RstB-RstA system in adhesion, biofilm production, motility, and hemolysis.

Authors:  Lixing Huang; Wei Xu; Yongquan Su; Lingmin Zhao; Qingpi Yan
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Bactericidal and anti-biofilm effects of uncharged and cationic ultrasound-responsive nitric oxide microbubbles on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Gareth LuTheryn; Charlotte Hind; Christopher Campbell; Aaron Crowther; Qiang Wu; Sara B Keller; Peter Glynne-Jones; J Mark Sutton; Jeremy S Webb; Michael Gray; Sandra A Wilks; Eleanor Stride; Dario Carugo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.073

7.  Effects of human serum and apo-Transferrin on Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A biofilm formation.

Authors:  Pengfei She; Lihua Chen; Yong Qi; Huan Xu; Yuan Liu; Yangxia Wang; Zhen Luo; Yong Wu
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.139

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.