Literature DB >> 18298884

Constraints on food choices of women in the UK with lower educational attainment.

M Barker1, W T Lawrence, T C Skinner, C O Haslam, S M Robinson, H M Inskip, B M Margetts, A A Jackson, D J P Barker, C Cooper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women of lower educational attainment have less balanced and varied diets than women of higher educational attainment. The diets of women are vital to the long-term health of their offspring. The present study aimed to identify factors that influence the food choices of women with lower educational attainment and how women could be helped to improve those choices.
DESIGN: We conducted eight focus group discussions with women of lower educational attainment to identify these factors. We contrasted the results of these discussions with those from three focus group discussions with women of higher educational attainment.
SETTING: Southampton, UK.
SUBJECTS: Forty-two white Caucasian women of lower educational attainment and fourteen of higher educational attainment aged 18 to 44 years.
RESULTS: The dominant theme in discussions with women of lower educational attainment was their sense that they lacked control over food choices for themselves and their families. Partners and children exerted a high degree of control over which foods were bought and prepared. Women's perceptions of the cost of healthy food, the need to avoid waste, being trapped at home surrounded by opportunities to snack, and having limited skill and experience with food, all contributed to their sense they lacked control over their own and their family's food choices.
CONCLUSIONS: An intervention to improve the food choices of women with lower educational attainment needs to increase their sense of control over their diet and the foods they buy. This might include increasing their skills in food preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18298884     DOI: 10.1017/S136898000800178X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  21 in total

1.  Women's perceptions of the relationship between recent life events, transitions, and diet in midlife: findings from a focus group study.

Authors:  Natasha A Brown; Katherine Clegg Smith; Elizabeth Edsall Kromm
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Advocating for Behavior Change With Education.

Authors:  Katherine R Arlinghaus; Craig A Johnston
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2017-12-09

3.  Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in assessing dietary intakes of low-income Caucasian postpartum women living in Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Authors:  Theodora Mouratidou; Fiona A Ford; Robert B Fraser
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  The Southampton Initiative for Health: a complex intervention to improve the diets and increase the physical activity levels of women from disadvantaged communities.

Authors:  Mary Barker; Janis Baird; Wendy Lawrence; Megan Jarman; Christina Black; Katharine Barnard; Sue Cradock; Jenny Davies; Barrie Margetts; Hazel Inskip; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-08-13

5.  LifeLab Southampton: a programme to engage adolescents with DOHaD concepts as a tool for increasing health literacy in teenagers -a pilot cluster-randomized control trial.

Authors:  K Woods-Townsend; H Leat; J Bay; L Bagust; H Davey; D Lovelock; A Christodoulou; J Griffiths; M Grace; K Godfrey; M Hanson; H Inskip
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Specific psychological variables predict quality of diet in women of lower, but not higher, educational attainment.

Authors:  Wendy Lawrence; Wolff Schlotz; Sarah Crozier; Timothy C Skinner; Cheryl Haslam; Sian Robinson; Hazel Inskip; Cyrus Cooper; Mary Barker
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Education and the Relationship Between Supermarket Environment and Diet.

Authors:  Christina Vogel; Georgia Ntani; Hazel Inskip; Mary Barker; Steven Cummins; Cyrus Cooper; Graham Moon; Janis Baird
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Developmental origins, behaviour change and the new public health.

Authors:  M Barker
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult?

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Mary Barker
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  Sociodemographic differences in motives for food selection: results from the LoCard cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Hanna Konttinen; Otto Halmesvaara; Mikael Fogelholm; Hannu Saarijärvi; Jaakko Nevalainen; Maijaliisa Erkkola
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.