June Stevens1,2, Eva Erber-Oakkar1, Zhaohui Cui1, Jianwen Cai3, Salim S Virani4, Emanuele Di Angelantonio5, David Wormser5. 1. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 4. Sections of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 5. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The 1998 and the 2013 guidelines on management of overweight and obesity in adults provided algorithms for identification of patients to be treated with weight loss. To date, the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in the groups recommended or not recommended for weight loss treatment has not been estimated and compared. METHODS: Baseline data for the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study were collected between 1987 and 1989 from adults aged 45 to 64 years. Black and White men and women free of CVD were followed over 22.8 years (median), and 2,907 incident CVD events were recorded. RESULTS: The hazard ratios adjusted for demographic variables in adults not recommended for treatment versus adults recommended for treatment were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.50-0.59) for the 1998 algorithm and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.58-0.69) for the 2013 algorithm, respectively. No gender or race differences were detected when the 2013 algorithm was applied, but using the 1998 algorithm, CVD risk between the groups recommended or not recommended for treatment was more pronounced in Black women than in Black men. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 algorithm performed similarly in Black and White men and women but did not improve upon the 1998 algorithm in terms of discriminating risk of CVD.
OBJECTIVE: The 1998 and the 2013 guidelines on management of overweight and obesity in adults provided algorithms for identification of patients to be treated with weight loss. To date, the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in the groups recommended or not recommended for weight loss treatment has not been estimated and compared. METHODS: Baseline data for the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study were collected between 1987 and 1989 from adults aged 45 to 64 years. Black and White men and women free of CVD were followed over 22.8 years (median), and 2,907 incident CVD events were recorded. RESULTS: The hazard ratios adjusted for demographic variables in adults not recommended for treatment versus adults recommended for treatment were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.50-0.59) for the 1998 algorithm and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.58-0.69) for the 2013 algorithm, respectively. No gender or race differences were detected when the 2013 algorithm was applied, but using the 1998 algorithm, CVD risk between the groups recommended or not recommended for treatment was more pronounced in Black women than in Black men. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 algorithm performed similarly in Black and White men and women but did not improve upon the 1998 algorithm in terms of discriminating risk of CVD.
Authors: Ann Marie Navar-Boggan; Michael J Pencina; Ken Williams; Allan D Sniderman; Eric D Peterson Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson; Harmon S Jordan; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert H Eckel; John M Jakicic; Jamy D Ard; Janet M de Jesus; Nancy Houston Miller; Van S Hubbard; I-Min Lee; Alice H Lichtenstein; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; Frank M Sacks; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Thomas A Wadden; Susan Z Yanovski; Karima A Kendall; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; George Velasco; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Harmon S Jordan; Karima A Kendall; Linda J Lux; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rena R Wing; Paula Bolin; Frederick L Brancati; George A Bray; Jeanne M Clark; Mace Coday; Richard S Crow; Jeffrey M Curtis; Caitlin M Egan; Mark A Espeland; Mary Evans; John P Foreyt; Siran Ghazarian; Edward W Gregg; Barbara Harrison; Helen P Hazuda; James O Hill; Edward S Horton; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert W Jeffery; Karen C Johnson; Steven E Kahn; Abbas E Kitabchi; William C Knowler; Cora E Lewis; Barbara J Maschak-Carey; Maria G Montez; Anne Murillo; David M Nathan; Jennifer Patricio; Anne Peters; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Henry Pownall; David Reboussin; Judith G Regensteiner; Amy D Rickman; Donna H Ryan; Monika Safford; Thomas A Wadden; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Delia S West; David F Williamson; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N Sarwar; P Gao; S R Kondapally Seshasai; R Gobin; S Kaptoge; E Di Angelantonio; E Ingelsson; D A Lawlor; E Selvin; M Stampfer; C D A Stehouwer; S Lewington; L Pennells; A Thompson; N Sattar; I R White; K K Ray; J Danesh Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 202.731