Literature DB >> 27181990

Airborne engineered nanomaterials in the workplace-a review of release and worker exposure during nanomaterial production and handling processes.

Yaobo Ding1, Thomas A J Kuhlbusch2, Martie Van Tongeren3, Araceli Sánchez Jiménez3, Ilse Tuinman4, Rui Chen5, Iñigo Larraza Alvarez6, Urszula Mikolajczyk7, Carmen Nickel8, Jessica Meyer8, Heinz Kaminski8, Wendel Wohlleben9, Burkhard Stahlmecke8, Simon Clavaguera10, Michael Riediker11.   

Abstract

For exposure and risk assessment in occupational settings involving engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), it is important to understand the mechanisms of release and how they are influenced by the ENM, the matrix material, and process characteristics. This review summarizes studies providing ENM release information in occupational settings, during different industrial activities and using various nanomaterials. It also assesses the contextual information - such as the amounts of materials handled, protective measures, and measurement strategies - to understand which release scenarios can result in exposure. High-energy processes such as synthesis, spraying, and machining were associated with the release of large numbers of predominantly small-sized particles. Low-energy processes, including laboratory handling, cleaning, and industrial bagging activities, usually resulted in slight or moderate releases of relatively large agglomerates. The present analysis suggests that process-based release potential can be ranked, thus helping to prioritize release assessments, which is useful for tiered exposure assessment approaches and for guiding the implementation of workplace safety strategies. The contextual information provided in the literature was often insufficient to directly link release to exposure. The studies that did allow an analysis suggested that significant worker exposure might mainly occur when engineering safeguards and personal protection strategies were not carried out as recommended.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Emission; Grouping; Nanoparticles; Occupational exposure; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27181990     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  17 in total

1.  Size, composition, morphology, and health implications of airborne incidental metal-containing nanoparticles.

Authors:  Natalia I Gonzalez-Pech; Larissa V Stebounova; Irem B Ustunol; Jae Hong Park; T Renee Anthony; Thomas M Peters; Vicki H Grassian
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials: a Review of Workplace Exposure Assessment Methods.

Authors:  Seth McCormick; Mamadou Niang; Matthew M Dahm
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-06-08

3.  The effect of single and combined exposures to magnetite and polymorphous silicon dioxide nanoparticles on the human A549 cell line: in vitro study.

Authors:  Athena Rafieepour; Mansour R Azari; Fariba Khodagholi; Jalal Pourahmad Jaktaji; Yadollah Mehrabi; Habibollah Peirovi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Nanoparticle decoration impacts airborne fungal pathobiology.

Authors:  Dana Westmeier; Djamschid Solouk-Saran; Cecilia Vallet; Svenja Siemer; Dominic Docter; Hermann Götz; Linda Männ; Anja Hasenberg; Angelina Hahlbrock; Kathrin Erler; Christoph Reinhardt; Oliver Schilling; Sven Becker; Matthias Gunzer; Mike Hasenberg; Shirley K Knauer; Roland H Stauber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Nanomaterials: certain aspects of application, risk assessment and risk communication.

Authors:  Peter Laux; Jutta Tentschert; Christian Riebeling; Albert Braeuning; Otto Creutzenberg; Astrid Epp; Valérie Fessard; Karl-Heinz Haas; Andrea Haase; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Norbert Jakubowski; Peter Kearns; Alfonso Lampen; Hubert Rauscher; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angela Störmer; Axel Thielmann; Uwe Mühle; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Workers' Exposure to Nano-Objects with Different Dimensionalities in R&D Laboratories: Measurement Strategy and Field Studies.

Authors:  Fabio Boccuni; Riccardo Ferrante; Francesca Tombolini; Daniela Lega; Alessandra Antonini; Antonello Alvino; Pasqualantonio Pingue; Fabio Beltram; Lucia Sorba; Vincenzo Piazza; Mauro Gemmi; Andrea Porcari; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Safety assessment of nanomaterials using an advanced decision-making framework, the DF4nanoGrouping.

Authors:  Robert Landsiedel; Lan Ma-Hock; Karin Wiench; Wendel Wohlleben; Ursula G Sauer
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Particle release and control of worker exposure during laboratory-scale synthesis, handling and simulated spills of manufactured nanomaterials in fume hoods.

Authors:  Ana S Fonseca; Eelco Kuijpers; Kirsten I Kling; Marcus Levin; Antti J Koivisto; Signe H Nielsen; W Fransman; Yijri Fedutik; Keld A Jensen; Ismo K Koponen
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  Modeling of High Nanoparticle Exposure in an Indoor Industrial Scenario with a One-Box Model.

Authors:  Carla Ribalta; Antti J Koivisto; Apostolos Salmatonidis; Ana López-Lilao; Eliseo Monfort; Mar Viana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Quartz crystal microbalances (QCM) are suitable for real-time dosimetry in nanotoxicological studies using VITROCELL®Cloud cell exposure systems.

Authors:  Yaobo Ding; Patrick Weindl; Anke-Gabriele Lenz; Paula Mayer; Tobias Krebs; Otmar Schmid
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.