| Literature DB >> 27181612 |
Shimpei Iikuni1, Masahiro Ono1, Hiroyuki Watanabe1, Kenji Matsumura1, Masashi Yoshimura1, Hiroyuki Kimura1, Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda2, Yoko Okamoto2, Masafumi Ihara3, Hideo Saji1.
Abstract
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by the deposition of amyloid aggregates in the walls of cerebral vasculature, is a major factor in intracerebral hemorrhage and vascular cognitive impairment and is also associated closely with Alzheimer's disease (AD). We previously reported (99m)Tc-hydroxamamide ((99m)Tc-Ham) complexes with a bivalent amyloid ligand showing high binding affinity for β-amyloid peptide (Aβ(1-42)) aggregates present frequently in the form in AD. In this article, we applied them to CAA-specific imaging probes, and evaluated their utility for CAA-specific imaging. In vitro inhibition assay using Aβ(1-40) aggregates deposited mainly in CAA and a brain uptake study were performed for (99m)Tc-Ham complexes, and all (99m)Tc-Ham complexes with an amyloid ligand showed binding affinity for Aβ(1-40) aggregates and very low brain uptake. In vitro autoradiography of human CAA brain sections and ex vivo autoradiography of Tg2576 mice were carried out for bivalent (99m)Tc-Ham complexes ([(99m)Tc]SB2A and [(99m)Tc]BT2B), and they displayed excellent labeling of Aβ depositions in human CAA brain sections and high affinity and selectivity to CAA in transgenic mice. These results may offer new possibilities for the development of clinically useful CAA-specific imaging probes based on the (99m)Tc-Ham complex.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27181612 PMCID: PMC4867616 DOI: 10.1038/srep25990
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Proposed structure of the 99mTc-Ham complexes.
Half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50, μM) for the binding of PIB to Aβ aggregates determined using 99mTc-Ham complexes as ligands.
| Compound | IC50 of PIB (μM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Aβ(1–40) | Aβ(1–42) | |
| [99mTc]SB1A | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.10 |
| [99mTc]SB1B | 0.45 ± 0.11 | 0.38 ± 0.08 |
| [99mTc]SB2A | 4.59 ± 0.77 | 16.40 ± 2.47 |
| [99mTc]SB2B | 3.37 ± 0.61 | 2.55 ± 0.45 |
| [99mTc]BT1A | 0.24 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| [99mTc]BT1B | 0.99 ± 0.17 | 0.47 ± 0.05 |
| [99mTc]BT2A | 1.58 ± 0.27 | 2.80 ± 0.32 |
| [99mTc]BT2B | 4.96 ± 0.90 | 5.78 ± 0.53 |
*Values are the mean ± standard error of the mean of 6–15 independent experiments.
†Data from our previous article (ref. 35).
Figure 2Comparison of radioactivity of extracted brain tissues after intravenous injection of 99mTc-Ham complexes and [18F]florbetapir in normal mice.
Values are the mean ± standard deviation of 5 animals. *Data from our previous article (ref. 45).
Figure 3In vitro autoradiogram of a brain section from a patient with CAA (female, 67 years old) labeled with [99mTc]SB2A (A). The same brain section was immunostained with an antibody against Aβ(1–40) (B). Blocking study with nonradioactive PIB was also performed using the adjacent brain section (C). In vitro autoradiogram of a brain section from a healthy control (male, 73 years old) labeled with [99mTc]SB2A (D).
Figure 4Ex vivo autoradiograms (ARG) from Tg2576 (A) and wild-type (C) mice with [99mTc]SB2A. The same sections were stained with thioflavin-S (ThS) (D,F). The same sections were also immunostained with an antibody against CD31 (G,I). Panel B,E,H represent magnified image details of panel A,D,G, respectively. Red arrows show Aβ depositions labeled with both ThS and anti-CD31 antibody. White arrowheads show Aβ depositions labeled with ThS, not anti-CD31 antibody.