Literature DB >> 27180922

A Biomechanical Analysis of Different Clavicular Tunnel Diameters in Anatomic Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Andreas Voss1, Knut Beitzel2, Farhang Alaee3, Alex Dukas3, Elmar Herbst2, Elifho Obopilwe3, John Apostolakos3, Jessica DiVenere3, Hardeep Singh3, Mark P Cote3, Augustus D Mazzocca3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a tendon-to-clavicle bone interface fixation of a graft in revision acromioclavicular reconstruction.
METHODS: Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. All specimens underwent bone density evaluation. For the primary reconstruction, a 5-mm semitendinosus allograft was inserted into a 5-mm bone tunnel at 25 and 45 mm from the lateral end of the clavicle using a 5.5 × 8-mm PEEK (polyether ether ketone) tenodesis screw. Each single graft was fixed in a cryo-clamp and cyclically loaded from 5 to 70 N for 3,000 cycles, followed by load-to-failure testing at a rate of 120 mm/min to simulate the revision case. To simulate tunnel widening, the tunnels of the revision series were over-drilled with an 8-mm drill, and a 5-mm semitendinosus graft with an 8 × 12-mm PEEK tenodesis screw was inserted. Biomechanical testing was then repeated.
RESULTS: The bone mineral density analysis showed a significantly higher density at the 45-mm hole compared with the 25-mm hole (P = .001). The ultimate load to failure increased from the 5.5-mm screw to the 8-mm screw at the 45-mm hole position (P = .001). There was no statistically significant difference at the 25-mm hole position (P = .934). No statistical significance for graft elongation comparing the 5.5-mm screw and the 8-mm screw at the 25-mm (P = .156) and 45-mm (P = .334) positions could be found.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparable biomechanical stability for the tendon-to-bone interface fixation in different clavicular tunnel diameters simulating primary and revision reconstruction was achieved. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is a lack of literature regarding revision acromioclavicular joint reconstruction, but our biomechanical results show comparable stability to primary reconstruction. These data provide support for the use of anatomic acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction in revision cases.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180922     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

1.  Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization leads to significant clavicular tunnel widening in the early post-operative period.

Authors:  Siva Thangaraju; Serdar Cepni; Petra Magosch; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Chronic acromioclavicular joint injury of Rockwood V type with concomitant chronic anterior sternoclavicular instability].

Authors:  Sebastian Schmitt; Petra Magosch; Peter Habermeyer; Sven Lichtenberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Knut Beitzel; Simon Archambault; Aulon Jerliu; Mark P Cote; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-16

4.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization: A Biomechanical Study of Bidirectional Stability and Strength.

Authors:  Patrick Hislop; Kentaro Sakata; David C Ackland; Robert Gotmaker; Matthew C Evans
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-04-17

6.  Radiological study of the Asian coracoid process and clavicle: Implications for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chi Loong Jen; Dong Hao Toon; Chung Hui Tan
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-13

Review 7.  Grade III Acromioclavicular Separations Treated With Suspensory Fixation Techniques: A Systematic Review of Level I Through IV Studies.

Authors:  Joseph J Ruzbarsky; Bryant P Elrick; Philip-C Nolte; Justin W Arner; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.