Literature DB >> 2718051

Rationale for spinal fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis.

R J Nasca1.   

Abstract

In order to define the indications for spinal fusion in patients undergoing decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis, 114 patients surgically treated were reviewed. Follow-up was 24 to 108 months. Patients were grouped into four categories: 15 with lateral recess stenosis, 45 with central-mixed stenosis, 43 with stenosis following prior lumbar surgery(s), and 11 with scoliosis and spinal stenosis. Only two patients with lateral recess stenosis underwent fusion with fair results. Approximately one-third of those with central-mixed stenosis required a fusion. Results were good in 70%. In those with stenosis following prior lumbar surgeries, although not statistically significant, those who had concomitant decompression and arthrodesis had a better outcome than those in whom decompression only was done. Patients with scoliosis and stenosis had decompression for significant motor and reflex deficits and fusion over the length of their major curves. Patients having decompression for lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, isolated disc resorption with degenerative facet joints, intervertebral disc disease with instability, and those with scoliosis with multidirectional instabilities benefit from concomitant spinal fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2718051     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198904000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Indications for stabilization in the management of lumbar disc disease.

Authors:  F K Conley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

3.  Instrumented Spinal Stabilization without Fusion for Spinal Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Dori Drakhshandeh; James A Miller; Andrew J Fabiano
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Low risk for vertebral slipping after decompression with facet joint preserving technique for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Akesson; K Jonsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine.

Authors:  J D Rompe; P Eysel; C Hopf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Transpedicular reduction and stabilization for postlaminectomy lumbar instability.

Authors:  T C Lee
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Effects of transforaminal injection for degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hee-Seung Nam; Yong Bum Park
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-08-31

8.  Clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated with lumbar decompression and the Cosmic "semi-rigid" posterior system.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-12-01

9.  Skipping posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization for distant segment degenerative disease.

Authors:  Bilgehan Solmaz; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Cengiz Gomleksiz; Yaprak Ataker; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-10-03

10.  Dynamic stabilization for challenging lumbar degenerative diseases of the spine: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.