Literature DB >> 27180118

Evaluation of the technical performance of three different commercial digital breast tomosynthesis systems in the clinical environment.

A Rodríguez-Ruiz1, M Castillo2, J Garayoa3, M Chevalier2.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to research and evaluate the performance of three different digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems in the clinical environment (Siemens Mammomat Inspiration, Hologic Selenia Dimensions, and Fujifilm Amulet Innovality). The characterization included the study of the detector, the automatic exposure control, and the resolution of DBT projections and reconstructed planes. The modulation transfer function (MTF) of the DBT projections was measured with a 1mm thick steel edge, showing a strong anisotropy (30-40% lower MTF0.5 frequencies in the tube travel direction). The in-plane MTF0.5, measured with a 25μm tungsten wire, ranges from 1.3 to 1.8lp/mm in the tube-travel direction and between 2.4 and 3.7lp/mm in the chest wall-nipple. In the latter direction, the MTF peak shift is more emphasized for large angular range systems (2.0 versus 1.0lp/mm). In-depth resolution of the planes, via the full width at half maximum (FWHM) from the point spread function of a 25μm tungsten wire, is not only influenced by angular range and yields 1.3-4.6mm among systems. The artifact spread function from 1mm diameter tungsten beads depends mainly on angular range, yielding two tendencies whether large (FWHM is 4.5mm) or small (FWHM is 10mm) angular range is used. DBT delivers per scan a mean glandular dose between 1.4 and 2.7mGy for a 45mm thick polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) block. In conclusion, we have identified and analysed specific metrics that can be used for quality assurance of DBT systems.
Copyright © 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital breast tomosynthesis; Image quality; Mean glandular dose; Quality control

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180118     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  8 in total

1.  The compressed breast during mammography and breast tomosynthesis: in vivo shape characterization and modeling.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Greeshma A Agasthya; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Sergei Zolotarev; Inge Hillman; Konstantinos Karalis; Dzmitry Stsepankou; Valeriy Vengrinovich; Jürgen Hesser; Tony M Svahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz; Albert Gubern-Merida; Mechli Imhof-Tas; Susanne Lardenoije; Alexander J T Wanders; Ingvar Andersson; Sophia Zackrisson; Kristina Lång; Magnus Dustler; Nico Karssemeijer; Ritse M Mann; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Design and development of a phantom for tomosynthesis with potential for automated analysis via the cloud.

Authors:  David Goodenough; Josh Levy; Hildur Olafsdottir; Ingvi Olafsson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz; Jonas Teuwen; Suzan Vreemann; Ramona W Bouwman; Ruben E van Engen; Nico Karssemeijer; Ritse M Mann; Albert Gubern-Merida; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Average absorbed breast dose (2ABD): an easy radiation dose index for digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Antonio C Traino; Patrizio Barca; Rocco Lamastra; Raffaele M Tucciariello; Chiara Sottocornola; Carolina Marini; Giacomo Aringhieri; Davide Caramella; Maria E Fantacci
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-07-07

7.  Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  John W Garrett; Yinsheng Li; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.

Authors:  Suzanne L van Winkel; Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Linda Appelman; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Nico Karssemeijer; Jonas Teuwen; Alexander J T Wanders; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.