Literature DB >> 27180061

Utility of peritoneal washing cytology in staging and prognosis of ovarian and fallopian tube neoplasms: a 10-year retrospective analysis.

Whitney Davidson1, Rashna Madan1, Maura O'Neil1, Ossama W Tawfik1, Fang Fan2.   

Abstract

The prognostic significance of peritoneal washing cytology in gynecologic neoplasms is controversial. The presence of neoplastic cells in peritoneal washings is currently part of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging systems in cases of ovarian and fallopian tube neoplasms without metastasis beyond the pelvis. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed all cases of ovarian and fallopian tube neoplasms in which cytologic studies were performed. The utility of cytology in tumor staging and the relationship between cytology results and patient outcome are studied. All cases of ovarian and fallopian tube neoplasms in our institution between July 2002 and July 2012 were reviewed. Primary tumor characteristics including type and pelvic extension were collected, categorized, and correlated with peritoneal washing cytology. Final tumor staging was reviewed and the impact of positive cytology was evaluated. A total of 120 cases of ovarian and fallopian tube neoplasms without extrapelvic metastasis were identified within the study period. Peritoneal washing cytology was positive in 24% (29/120) of neoplasms and upstaged the tumor 83% (24/29) of the time when positive. Overall, 20% (24/120) of reviewed cases were upstaged based on positive cytology results. Peritoneal washing cytology remains a useful staging tool for ovarian and fallopian tube neoplasms limited to the pelvic cavity. Positive cytology results in upstaging in a significant proportion of the cases regardless of the tumor type. A larger study is needed to analyze follow-up data to determine if upstaging based on positive cytology adversely affects outcome.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytology; Ovarian neoplasm; Peritoneal washing; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180061     DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2016.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Significance of Peritoneal Washing as a Prognostic Indicator for Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Christina Christou; Sevasti-Effraimia Krouskou; Antonios Koutras; Thomas Ntounis; Zacharias Fasoulakis; Asimina Valsamaki; Vasilios Pergialiotis; Sotirios Sotiriou; Kyriakos Konis; Panagiotis Symeonidis; Athina A Samara; Athanasios Pagkalos; Athanasios Chionis; Georgios Daskalakis; Emmanuel N Kontomanolis
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-09-03

2.  Impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival of epithelial ovarian neoplasms in reproductive age.

Authors:  Maya Hanatani; Nobuhisa Yoshikawa; Kosuke Yoshida; Satoshi Tamauchi; Yoshiki Ikeda; Kimihiro Nishino; Kaoru Niimi; Shiro Suzuki; Michiyasu Kawai; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Negative peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery predicts overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ayaka Iura; Morihito Takita; Aiko Kawano; Kazuaki Imai; Katsuyuki Konnai; Ryo Onose; Hisamori Kato
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Diaphragmatic smears are not of additional benefit in the detection of peritoneal spread in gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Celine Montavon; Uzma Mirza; Andre Fedier; Andreas Schoetzau; Rosanna Zanetti Dällenbach; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.