Literature DB >> 27179798

Regression standardization with the R package stdReg.

Arvid Sjölander1.   

Abstract

When studying the association between an exposure and an outcome, it is common to use regression models to adjust for measured confounders. The most common models in epidemiologic research are logistic regression and Cox regression, which estimate conditional (on the confounders) odds ratios and hazard ratios. When the model has been fitted, one can use regression standardization to estimate marginal measures of association. If the measured confounders are sufficient for confounding control, then the marginal association measures can be interpreted as poulation causal effects. In this paper we describe a new R package, stdReg, that carries out regression standardization with generalized linear models (e.g. logistic regression) and Cox regression models. We illustrate the package with several examples, using real data that are publicly available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox regression; Hazard ratio; Logistic regression; Odds ratio; Standardization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27179798     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-016-0157-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  8 in total

1.  Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.

Authors:  Tosiya Sato; Yutaka Matsuyama
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Estimation based on case-control designs with known prevalence probability.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Doubly-robust estimators of treatment-specific survival distributions in observational studies with stratified sampling.

Authors:  Xiaofei Bai; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Sean M O'Brien
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Aetiological factors in oesophageal cancer in Singapore Chinese.

Authors:  U W De Jong; N Breslow; J G Hong; M Sridharan; K Shanmugaratnam
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1980

7.  A principal stratification approach to assess the differences in prognosis between cancers caused by hormone replacement therapy and by other factors.

Authors:  Arvid Sjolander; Stijn Vansteelandt; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  A new proposal for multivariable modelling of time-varying effects in survival data based on fractional polynomial time-transformation.

Authors:  Willi Sauerbrei; Patrick Royston; Maxime Look
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.207

  8 in total
  25 in total

1.  Which Factors Are Associated With Satisfaction With Treatment Results in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions? A Large Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Willemijn Anna De Ridder; Robbert Maarten Wouters; Lisa Hoogendam; Guus Maarten Vermeulen; Harm Pieter Slijper; Ruud Willem Selles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and clinically diagnosed obesity in adolescence and young adulthood: a register-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Catharina A Hartman; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Stephen V Faraone; Catarina Almqvist; Henrik Larsson
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Generalizability and effect measure modification in sibling comparison studies.

Authors:  Arvid Sjölander; Sara Öberg; Thomas Frisell
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 12.434

4.  Planning a method for covariate adjustment in individually randomised trials: a practical guide.

Authors:  Tim P Morris; A Sarah Walker; Elizabeth J Williamson; Ian R White
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.728

5.  Estimation of causal effect measures with the R-package stdReg.

Authors:  Arvid Sjölander
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Sex and survival in non-small cell lung cancer: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Cecilia Radkiewicz; Paul William Dickman; Anna Louise Viktoria Johansson; Gunnar Wagenius; Gustaf Edgren; Mats Lambe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Determinants of Mammographic Density Change.

Authors:  Shadi Azam; Arvid Sjölander; Mikael Eriksson; Marike Gabrielson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  G-computation for policy-relevant effects of interventions on time-to-event outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander Breskin; Andrew Edmonds; Stephen R Cole; Daniel Westreich; Jennifer Cocohoba; Mardge H Cohen; Seble G Kassaye; Lisa R Metsch; Anjali Sharma; Michelle S Williams; Adaora A Adimora
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 9.685

9.  Common psychiatric and metabolic comorbidity of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Catharina A Hartman; Jan Haavik; Jaanus Harro; Kari Klungsøyr; Tor-Arne Hegvik; Rob Wanders; Cæcilie Ottosen; Søren Dalsgaard; Stephen V Faraone; Henrik Larsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Marginal measures and causal effects using the relative survival framework.

Authors:  Elisavet Syriopoulou; Mark J Rutherford; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.