| Literature DB >> 27179038 |
Alex Pearson1, Elizabeth Smyth2, Irina S Babina1, Maria Teresa Herrera-Abreu1, Noelia Tarazona1, Clare Peckitt2, Elaine Kilgour3, Neil R Smith3, Catherine Geh3, Claire Rooney3, Ros Cutts1, James Campbell1, Jian Ning4, Kerry Fenwick4, Amanda Swain4, Gina Brown5, Sue Chua6, Anne Thomas7, Stephen R D Johnston8, Mazhar Ajaz9, Katherine Sumpter10, Angela Gillbanks2, David Watkins2, Ian Chau2, Sanjay Popat11, David Cunningham2, Nicholas C Turner1,8.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: FGFR1 and FGFR2 are amplified in many tumor types, yet what determines response to FGFR inhibition in amplified cancers is unknown. In a translational clinical trial, we show that gastric cancers with high-level clonal FGFR2 amplification have a high response rate to the selective FGFR inhibitor AZD4547, whereas cancers with subclonal or low-level amplification did not respond. Using cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models, we show that high-level FGFR2 amplification initiates a distinct oncogene addiction phenotype, characterized by FGFR2-mediated transactivation of alternative receptor kinases, bringing PI3K/mTOR signaling under FGFR control. Signaling in low-level FGFR1-amplified cancers is more restricted to MAPK signaling, limiting sensitivity to FGFR inhibition. Finally, we show that circulating tumor DNA screening can identify high-level clonally amplified cancers. Our data provide a mechanistic understanding of the distinct pattern of oncogene addiction seen in highly amplified cancers and demonstrate the importance of clonality in predicting response to targeted therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: Robust single-agent response to FGFR inhibition is seen only in high-level FGFR-amplified cancers, with copy-number level dictating response to FGFR inhibition in vitro, in vivo, and in the clinic. High-level amplification of FGFR2 is relatively rare in gastric and breast cancers, and we show that screening for amplification in circulating tumor DNA may present a viable strategy to screen patients. Cancer Discov; 6(8); 838-51. ©2016 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 803. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27179038 PMCID: PMC5338732 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Discov ISSN: 2159-8274 Impact factor: 39.397