Anna Estraneo1, Vincenzo Loreto2, Ivan Guarino2, Virginia Boemia2, Giuseppe Paone2, Pasquale Moretta2, Luigi Trojano3. 1. Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Telese Terme (BN), Via Bagni Vecchi 1, 82037 Telese Terme (BN), Italy. Electronic address: anna.estraneo@fsm.it. 2. Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Telese Terme (BN), Via Bagni Vecchi 1, 82037 Telese Terme (BN), Italy. 3. Neuropsychology Lab., Dept. of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Viale Ellittico 31, 81100 Caserta, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study assessed the ability of standard EEG in distinguishing vegetative state (VS) from minimally conscious state plus (MCS+) or MCS minus (MCS-), and to correlate EEG features with aetiology and level of responsiveness assessed by Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). METHODS: We analyzed background EEG activity and EEG reactivity to eye opening and closing and to tactile, acoustic, nociceptive stimuli and Intermittent Photic Stimulation (IPS) in 73 inpatients (VS=37, MCS-=11, MCS+=25), with traumatic (n=21), vascular (n=25) or anoxic (n=27) aetiology. RESULTS: All patients, but one, showed abnormal background activity. EEG abnormalities were more severe in VS than in MCS+ or MCS-, and in anoxic than other aetiologies. MCS+ patients with normal or Mildly Abnormal background activity showed higher scores on CRS-R than patients with moderate to severe EEG abnormalities. Reactivity to IPS, and acoustic stimuli was significantly more frequent in MCS+ and MCS- than in VS patients. CONCLUSIONS: EEG features differ between VS and MCS- or MCS+ patients and can provide evidence of relative sparing of thalamocortical connections in MCS+ patients. In anoxic patients EEG organization is more severely impaired and provides less discriminative diagnostic information. SIGNIFICANCE: Conventional EEG can help clinicians to disentangle VS from MCS patients.
OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study assessed the ability of standard EEG in distinguishing vegetative state (VS) from minimally conscious state plus (MCS+) or MCS minus (MCS-), and to correlate EEG features with aetiology and level of responsiveness assessed by Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). METHODS: We analyzed background EEG activity and EEG reactivity to eye opening and closing and to tactile, acoustic, nociceptive stimuli and Intermittent Photic Stimulation (IPS) in 73 inpatients (VS=37, MCS-=11, MCS+=25), with traumatic (n=21), vascular (n=25) or anoxic (n=27) aetiology. RESULTS: All patients, but one, showed abnormal background activity. EEG abnormalities were more severe in VS than in MCS+ or MCS-, and in anoxic than other aetiologies. MCS+ patients with normal or Mildly Abnormal background activity showed higher scores on CRS-R than patients with moderate to severe EEG abnormalities. Reactivity to IPS, and acoustic stimuli was significantly more frequent in MCS+ and MCS- than in VS patients. CONCLUSIONS: EEG features differ between VS and MCS- or MCS+ patients and can provide evidence of relative sparing of thalamocortical connections in MCS+ patients. In anoxic patients EEG organization is more severely impaired and provides less discriminative diagnostic information. SIGNIFICANCE: Conventional EEG can help clinicians to disentangle VS from MCSpatients.
Authors: Alfonso Magliacano; Francesco De Bellis; Alejandro Galvao-Carmona; Anna Estraneo; Luigi Trojano Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: A Pascarella; S Fiorenza; O Masotta; V Tibollo; D Vella; Anna Maria Nardone; Marta Rossi; P Volanti; F Madonia; Gaetano Cstronovo; D De Cicco; Caterina Guarnaschelli; M P Achilli; C Chiapparino; M T Angelillo; M A Tommasi; F Pisano; G Grioni; G Vezzadini; G Ferriero; S Salvaderi; R Bellazzi; Anna Estraneo Journal: Funct Neurol Date: 2018 Jan/Mar
Authors: John C O'Donnell; Kevin D Browne; Todd J Kilbaugh; H Isaac Chen; John Whyte; D Kacy Cullen Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Charlène Aubinet; Stephen Karl Larroque; Lizette Heine; Charlotte Martial; Steve Majerus; Steven Laureys; Carol Di Perri Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Ayham Alkhachroum; Brian Appavu; Benjamin Rohaut; Jan Claassen; Satoshi Egawa; Brandon Foreman; Nicolas Gaspard; Emily J Gilmore; Lawrence J Hirsch; Pedro Kurtz; Virginie Lambrecq; Julie Kromm; Paul Vespa; Sahar F Zafar Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 41.787
Authors: Joseph T Giacino; Douglas I Katz; Nicholas D Schiff; John Whyte; Eric J Ashman; Stephen Ashwal; Richard Barbano; Flora M Hammond; Steven Laureys; Geoffrey S F Ling; Risa Nakase-Richardson; Ronald T Seel; Stuart Yablon; Thomas S D Getchius; Gary S Gronseth; Melissa J Armstrong Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 9.910