Literature DB >> 27178838

Process Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Media Campaigns in Appalachian Ohio.

Mira L Katz1, Gregory S Young1, Paul L Reiter1, Michael L Pennell1, Jesse J Plascak2, Barret J Zimmermann1, Janice L Krieger3, Michael D Slater1, Cathy M Tatum1, Electra D Paskett1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide process data from campaigns (2009-2010) to improve colorectal cancer (CRC; intervention) screening and fruit and vegetable (F&amp;V; comparison) consumption in 12 Appalachian Ohio counties. County-specific campaigns included one billboard, posters, and articles for local newspapers. Participants in CRC screening counties who reported seeing CRC screening billboards had greater intention to talk to a doctor/nurse about screening in the next 6 months (odds ratio [OR] = 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.71, 4.99]) and had twice the odds of talking to a doctor/nurse about screening in the past year (OR = 2.15, 95% CI [1.29, 3.60]) compared to those who did not see the billboards. Participants in F&amp;V counties who reported seeing F&amp;V billboards had twice the odds (OR = 2.27, 95% CI [1.35, 3.84]) of talking to a doctor/nurse in the past year about F&amp;Vs compared to those who did not see the billboards. Participants who reported campaign exposure lived closer to the billboards compared to those who did not report campaign exposure (mean distance in miles from home to billboard: 8.8 vs. 10.9; p < .01). Most participants reported campaign messages were clear and important. Results suggest that partnering with community members to develop campaign materials is important to ensure cultural appropriateness and that exposure to the intervention components may affect health-related outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer screening; communication; community intervention; fruit; vegetables

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27178838      PMCID: PMC5107350          DOI: 10.1177/1524839916641638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  23 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research.

Authors:  Rena J Pasick; Robert A Hiatt; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: marketing health in a crowded media world.

Authors:  Whitney Randolph; K Viswanath
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Observations from the CDC: CDC's Screen for Life: a National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign.

Authors:  C M Jorgensen; C A Gelb; T L Merritt; L C Seeff
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2001-06

4.  Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behaviors among Appalachian residents.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Adana A Llanos; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.462

5.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.

Authors:  R M Mickey; S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Celebrity appeal: reaching women to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Cynthia A Gelb; Kathleen Lobb
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Increasing colon cancer testing in rural Colorado: evaluation of the exposure to a community-based awareness campaign.

Authors:  Linda Zittleman; Caroline Emsermann; Miriam Dickinson; Ned Norman; Kathy Winkelman; Grace Linn; John M Westfall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Predictors of colorectal screening in rural Colorado: testing to prevent colon cancer in the high plains research network.

Authors:  Walter F Young; Joe McGloin; Linda Zittleman; David R West; John M Westfall
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Community Members' Input into Cancer Prevention Campaign Development and Experience Being Featured in the Campaign.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Brittney Keller; Cathy M Tatum; Darla K Fickle; Courtney Midkiff; Sharon Carver; Janice L Krieger; Michael D Slater; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015

10.  A Media and Clinic Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Mira L Katz; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Paul L Reiter; Jesse J Plascak; Michael D Slater; Janice L Krieger; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Changes in colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention among Ohio African American and Appalachian participants: The screen to save initiative.

Authors:  Andrew S Boutsicaris; James L Fisher; Darrell M Gray; Toyin Adeyanju; Jacquelin S Holland; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.