Literature DB >> 27178833

Dynamics of the erythropoiesis stimulating agent resistance index in incident hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis patients.

Daniele Marcelli1, Inga Bayh2, José I Merello3, Pedro Ponce4, Alex Heaton5, Fatih Kircelli6, Charles Chazot7, Attilio Di Benedetto8, Cristina Marelli9, Erzsebet Ladanyi10, Miroslaw Kroczak11, Stefano Stuard2, Aileen Grassmann2, Laura Scatizzi2, Katharina Brand2, Bernard Canaud2.   

Abstract

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in dialysis patients is poorly understood. Some studies report an improvement in the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance index (ERI) with hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus high-flux hemodialysis (HD). We explored ERI dynamics in 38,340 incident HDF and HD patients treated in 22 countries over a 7-year period. Groups were matched by propensity score at baseline (6 months after dialysis initiation). The follow-up period (mean of 1.31 years) was stratified into 1 month intervals with delta analyses performed for key ERI-related parameters. Dialysis modality, time interval, and polycystic kidney disease were included in a linear mixed model with the outcome ERI. Baseline ERI was nonsignificantly higher in HDF versus HD treatment. ERI decreased significantly faster in HDF-treated patients than in HD-treated patients, was decreased in both HD and HDF when patients were treated with intravenous darbepoetin alfa, but only in HDF when treated with intravenous recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). A clear difference between HD- and HDF-treated patients could only be found for patients with high baseline ERI and assigned to intravenous rHuEPO treatment. A significant advantage in terms of lower ERI for patients treated by HDF was found. Sensitivity analysis limited this advantage for HDF to those patients treated with intravenous rHuEPO (not darbepoetin alfa or subcutaneous rHuEPO) and to patients with a high baseline ERI. Thus, our results allow more accurate planning for future clinical trials addressing anemia management in dialysis patients.
Copyright © 2016 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERI; ESA; dialysis; hemodiafiltration; rHuEPO

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27178833     DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  11 in total

1.  Hemodiafiltration to Address Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Jörg Vienken; Stephen Ash; Richard A Ward
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Selenium Associates With Response to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Minoru Yasukawa; Shigeyuki Arai; Michito Nagura; Ryo Kido; Shinichiro Asakawa; Daigoro Hirohama; Osamu Yamazaki; Yoshifuru Tamura; Michitaka Fujimaki; Sawako Kobayashi; Masakazu Mimaki; Hiroko Kodama; Shunya Uchida; Yoshihide Fujigaki; Shigeru Shibata
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-04-16

3.  Resistance to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents among Patients on Hemodialysis Is Typically Transient.

Authors:  David A Goodkin; Junhui Zhao; Aleix Cases; Masaomi Nangaku; Angelo Karaboyas
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.605

4.  High Erythropoiesis Resistance Index Is a Significant Predictor of Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality in Chinese Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Xiangxue Lu; Jialing Zhang; Shixiang Wang; Qian Yu; Han Li
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.711

5.  Expanded hemodialysis as effective alternative to on-line hemodiafiltration: A randomized mid-term clinical trial.

Authors:  Fernando Hadad-Arrascue; Lars-Göran Nilsson; Angela S Rivera; Angelito A Bernardo; Juan B Cabezuelo Romero
Journal:  Ther Apher Dial       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.195

6.  Hemodiafiltration improves red blood cell lifespan in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Ying Jiang; Jiu-Hong Li; Jun-Feng Luo; Quan-Sheng Han; Sheng-Lang Zhu; Yong-Jian Ma; Hou-De Zhang
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.886

7.  Online hemodiafilteration use in children: a single center experience with a twist.

Authors:  Magid A A Ibrahim; Ihab Z ElHakim; Dina Soliman; Muhammad A Mubarak; Ragia M Said
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Effects of high-volume online mixed-hemodiafiltration on anemia management in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Luciano A Pedrini; Adam M Zawada; Anke C Winter; Jenny Pham; Gudrun Klein; Melanie Wolf; Astrid Feuersenger; Pio Ruggiero; Annalisa Feliciani; Carlo Barbieri; Adelheid Gauly; Bernard Canaud; Stefano Stuard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Hamza Ayari; Florence Pasquier; Khalil El Karoui; Marion Sallée; Stanislas Faguer; Thierry Krummel; Laurence Nicolet; Thibault Dolley-Hitze; Vincent Audard; Christophe Ridel; Jean-Baptiste Micol; Maxime Touzot
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2019-05-18

Review 10.  The Influence of Inflammation on Anemia in CKD Patients.

Authors:  Anna Gluba-Brzózka; Beata Franczyk; Robert Olszewski; Jacek Rysz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.