Literature DB >> 27178250

Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of K-files, ProGlider File, and G-Files: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals.

Farzana Paleker1, Peet J van der Vyver2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare centering ability and apical canal transportation of K-files (KF), ProGlider (PG), and G-Files (GF) after glide path enlargement in curved canals by using micro-computed tomography.
METHODS: Thirty canals each were randomly assigned to KF, GF, and PG. Teeth were scanned before and after glide path enlargement to compare centering ability at 3 levels: 1 mm (D1) and 7 mm (D7) from the apical foramen and at the point of maximum root curvature (Dmc). Transportation was assessed in 8 directions at D1.
RESULTS: KF were significantly less centered than both nickel-titanium (NiTi) groups at D1. At Dmc, PG exhibited a significantly more centered enlargement than both GF and KF, which were significantly similar. At D7, PG was significantly more centered than KF, but there were no significant differences between GF and KF or between PG and GF (P < .016). KF exhibited significantly more canal transportation at D1 than the NiTi groups (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: NiTi files cause less transportation than KF. At D1, KF was less centered than both NiTi files. PG remained more centered at Dmc and D7.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centering ability; G-Files; K-files; ProGlider; glide path enlargement; micro-computed tomography; transportation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27178250     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  12 in total

Review 1.  Endodontic Rotary Files, What Should an Endodontist Know?

Authors:  Ana-Belén Dablanca-Blanco; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Ramón Miguéns-Vila; Pablo Álvarez-Novoa; Benjamín Martín-Biedma
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mohsen Aminsobhani; Fatemeh Hamidzadeh; Arvin Rezaei Avval; Farid Merrikhi; Ehsan Sadri
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Computed tomography evaluation of root canal transportation using ProTaper, Race and Sendoline rotary systems: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Eshaghali Saberi; Bita Aramesh
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-06-06

4.  Influence of glide path kinematics during endodontic treatment on the occurrence and intensity of intraoperative and postoperative pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Thaís Christina Cunha; Felipe de Souza Matos; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Ítalo de Macedo Bernardino; Camilla Christian Gomes Moura
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Comparison of glide paths created with K-files, PathFiles, and the ProGlider file, and their effects on subsequent WaveOne preparation in curved canals.

Authors:  Linxia Zheng; Xiongfei Ji; Chengxi Li; Lulu Zuo; Xin Wei
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Comparison of postoperative pain intensity after using reciprocating and continuous rotary glide path systems: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mehmet Adıgüzel; Koray Yılmaz; Pelin Tüfenkçi
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2019-02-12

7.  Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) Evaluation of Effects of Different Rotary Glide Path Techniques on Canal Transportation and Centering in Curved Root Canals.

Authors:  Gabrielė Česaitienė; Tadas Venskutonis; Vita Mačiulskienė; Vaidotas Cicėnas; Vykintas Samaitis; Elena Jasiūnienė
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-08-24

8.  Comparison of PathFile and ProFinder Systems to Create a Glide Path in Curved Root Canals.

Authors:  Ruth Pérez Alfayate; Montse Mercade; Jorge Vera Rojas; Roberto Estévez Luaña; Ana Antoranz Pereda; Juan Algar; Rafael Cisneros Cabello
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2018-03-06

9.  Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals.

Authors:  Shiva Shojaeian; Niloofar Mortezapour; Fatemeh Soltaninejad; Nazanin Zargar; Babak Zandi; Yazdan Shantiaee; Amin Bidaki
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-11-09

10.  Influence of Two Preparation Techniques on Transportation of Simulated Type II Root Canals.

Authors:  Saeed Moradi; Maryam Gharechahi; Fatemeh Bonyadimanesh
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.