Literature DB >> 27178168

Risk factors for wound complications after abdominoperineal excision: analysis of the ACS NSQIP database.

A A Althumairi1, J K Canner2, S L Gearhart1, B Safar1, S H Fang1, E C Wick1, J E Efron1.   

Abstract

AIM: The perineal wound following abdominoperineal excision (APR) is associated with a high complication rate. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for wound complications and examine the effect of flap reconstruction on wound healing.
METHOD: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was searched for patients who underwent APR for rectal adenocarcinoma. They were divided into two groups: primary closure of the perineal wound and flap reconstruction. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for deep surgical site infection (SSI) and wound dehiscence.
RESULTS: A total of 8449 (94%) patients from the database underwent primary closure and 550 (6%) underwent flap reconstruction. Patients who underwent flap reconstruction had a longer operation time, a higher incidence of deep SSI, wound dehiscence, more blood transfusion requirement and a higher rate of return to the operating room (all P < 0.001). Risk factors for deep SSI were African American race (OR 1.5, P = 0.02), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4 (OR 3.2, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m(2) (OR 1.7, P = 0.006), weight loss (OR 2, P < 0.001) and closure with a flap (OR 1.9, P < 0.001). Risk factors for wound dehiscence included ASA classification ≥ 4 (OR 2.2, P = 0.003), history of smoking (OR 2.2, P < 0.001), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.7, P = 0.03), BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2) (OR 1.9, P = 0.001) and closure with a flap (OR 2.9, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Perineal wound complications are related to a patient's race, ASA classification, smoking, obesity and weight loss. Compared with primary closure, closure with a flap was associated with higher odds of wound infection and dehiscence and was not protective of wound complications in the presence of other risk factors. Therefore optimizing the patient's medical condition will lead to a better outcome irrespective of the technique used for perineal wound closure. Colorectal Disease
© 2016 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominoperineal excision; flap reconstruction; rectal cancer; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27178168     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  10 in total

1.  Tailored concept for the plastic closure of pelvic defects resulting from extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) or pelvic exenteration.

Authors:  Julia Jackisch; Thomas Jackisch; Joerg Roessler; Anja Sims; Holger Nitzsche; Pia Mann; Sören Torge Mees; Sigmar Stelzner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 2.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Chunhu Shi; En Lin Goh; Elizabeth Ma Murphy; Adam Reid; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Healing of the perineal wound after proctectomy in Crohn's disease patients: only preoperative perineal sepsis predicts poor outcome.

Authors:  W Li; L Stocchi; F Elagili; R P Kiran; S A Strong
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Joan Webster; Zhenmi Liu; Gill Norman; Jo C Dumville; Laura Chiverton; Paul Scuffham; Monica Stankiewicz; Wendy P Chaboyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

5.  Fecal diversion does not support healing of anus-near pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury-results of a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andreas M Pussin; Luisa C Lichtenthäler; Mirko Aach; Thomas A Schildhauer; Thorsten Brechmann
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-01

7.  Risk factors for wound complications following spine surgery.

Authors:  Keaton F Piper; Samuel B Tomlinson; Gabrielle Santangelo; Joseph Van Galen; Ian DeAndrea-Lazarus; James Towner; Kristopher T Kimmell; Howard Silberstein; George Edward Vates
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-11-01

8.  What is the advantage of rectal amputation with an initial perineal approach for primary anorectal carcinoma?

Authors:  Kimihiko Funahashi; Mayu Goto; Tomoaki Kaneko; Mitsunori Ushigome; Satoru Kagami; Takamaru Koda; Yasuo Nagashima; Kimihiko Yoshida; Yasuyuki Miura
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 10.  Obesity as a surgical risk factor.

Authors:  Motonari Ri; Susumu Aikou; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-10-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.