Literature DB >> 27177569

Comparison of Digital Rectal and Microchip Transponder Thermometry in Ferrets (Mustela putorius furo).

Branden M Maxwell1, Marla K Brunell2, Cara H Olsen3, David E Bentzel2.   

Abstract

Body temperature is a common physiologic parameter measured in both clinical and research settings, with rectal thermometry being implied as the 'gold standard.' However, rectal thermometry usually requires physical or chemical restraint, potentially causing falsely elevated readings due to animal stress. A less stressful method may eliminate this confounding variable. The current study compared 2 types of digital rectal thermometers-a calibrated digital thermometer and a common digital thermometer-with an implantable subcutaneous transponder microchip. Microchips were implanted subcutaneously between the shoulder blades of 16 ferrets (8 male, 8 female), and temperatures were measured twice from the microchip reader and once from each of the rectal thermometers. Results demonstrated the microchip temperature readings had very good to good correlation and agreement to those from both of the rectal thermometers. This study indicates that implantable temperature-sensing microchips are a reliable alternative to rectal thermometry for monitoring body temperature in ferrets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27177569      PMCID: PMC4865697     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  20 in total

1.  Tympanic infrared thermometry to determine cat body temperature.

Authors:  B J Martin
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1995-05

2.  A comparison of non-contact, subcutaneous, and rectal temperatures in captive owl monkeys (Aotus sp.).

Authors:  L J Shelton; C E White; S A Felt
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.667

3.  A microchip implant system as a method to determine body temperature of terminally ill rats and mice.

Authors:  W J Kort; J M Hekking-Weijma; M T TenKate; V Sorm; R VanStrik
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.

Authors:  S D Walter; M Eliasziw; A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Telemetric evaluation of body temperature and physical activity as predictors of mortality in a murine model of staphylococcal enterotoxic shock.

Authors:  K D Vlach; J W Boles; B G Stiles
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 0.982

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Functionality of implanted microchips following magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Katherine A Haifley; Silke Hecht
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.936

8.  Effect of physical restraint on the limits of thermoregulation in telemetered rats.

Authors:  Cenk Aydin; Curtis E Grace; Christopher J Gordon
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Comparison of rectal, microchip transponder, and infrared thermometry techniques for obtaining body temperature in the laboratory rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  Patty H Chen; Charles E White
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Transplantation of PC1/3-Expressing alpha-cells improves glucose handling and cold tolerance in leptin-resistant mice.

Authors:  Rhonda D Wideman; Sarah L Gray; Scott D Covey; Gene C Webb; Timothy J Kieffer
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 11.454

View more
  1 in total

1.  Body temperature and host species preferences of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Chika Edward Uzoigwe
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 8.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.