Literature DB >> 2717739

Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging.

L Arrivé1, H Hricak, M C Martin.   

Abstract

The value of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.35 T in detecting, characterizing, and staging pelvic endometriosis was prospectively investigated in 30 consecutive women in whom this disease was clinically suspected. MR findings were correlated with the results of laparoscopy (13 women) and laparotomy (17 women). Surgical examination revealed a normal pelvis in five patients and endometriosis in 25. Three of the five normal cases and 16 of the 25 cases of endometriosis were correctly identified with MR imaging (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 60%; accuracy, 63%). MR imaging demonstrated seven of eight endometriomas but only 14 of 29 adhesions and only six of 45 endometrial implants. While MR imaging demonstrated endometriomas, ovarian adhesions, and extraperitoneal endometrial implants, it could not accurately depict extraovarian endometrial adhesions and intraperitoneal endometrial implants. In addition, MR imaging findings did not correlate with the surgically determined severity of the disease. These limitations indicate that MR imaging cannot be used as the primary modality in the detection, characterization, and staging of endometriosis; laparoscopy remains the procedure of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2717739     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.171.3.2717739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review.

Authors:  Karen Kinkel; Kathrin A Frei; Corinne Balleyguier; Charles Chapron
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

3.  Endometriosis: A Retrospective Analysis on Diagnostic Data in a Cohort of 4,401 Patients.

Authors:  Pietro G Signorile; Maria Cassano; Rosa Viceconte; Maria Spyrou; Valentina Marcattilj; Alfonso Baldi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  A logistic model for the prediction of endometriosis.

Authors:  Barbara J Stegmann; Michele Jonsson Funk; Ninet Sinaii; Katherine E Hartmann; James Segars; Lynnette K Nieman; Pamela Stratton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Paula Carvalhal Moura; Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza Ribeiro; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Ricardo Simões; Ulysses S Torres; Giuseppe D'Ippolito; Marc Bazot; Paulo Augusto Ayrosa Galvão Ribeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Endometriosis: advances and controversies in classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Edgardo Rolla
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-04-23

7.  Difficulty in predicting intra-abdominal adhesion before cesarean section: A case report.

Authors:  Nanao Suzuki; Yu Wakaki; Kaori Watanabe; Yukiko Kumasaka; Rika Suzuki
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.