Literature DB >> 18462722

A logistic model for the prediction of endometriosis.

Barbara J Stegmann1, Michele Jonsson Funk, Ninet Sinaii, Katherine E Hartmann, James Segars, Lynnette K Nieman, Pamela Stratton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model that uses individual and lesion characteristics to help surgeons choose lesions that have a high probability of containing histologically confirmed endometriosis.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospectively collected information.
SETTING: Government research hospital in the United States. PATIENT(S): Healthy women 18-45 years of age, with chronic pelvic pain and possible endometriosis, who were enrolled in a clinical trial. INTERVENTION(S): All participants underwent laparoscopy, and information was collected on all visible lesions. Lesion data were randomly allocated to a training and test data set. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Predictive logistic regression, with the outcome of interest being histologic diagnosis of endometriosis. RESULT(S): After validation, the model was applied to the complete data set, with a sensitivity of 88.4% and specificity of 24.6%. The positive predictive value was 69.2%, and the negative predictive value was 53.3%, equating to correct classification of a lesion of 66.5%. Mixed color; larger width; and location in the ovarian fossa, colon, or appendix were most strongly associated with the presence of endometriosis. CONCLUSION(S): This model identified characteristics that indicate high and low probabilities of biopsy-proven endometriosis. It is useful as a guide in choosing appropriate lesions for biopsy, but the improvement using the model is not great enough to replace histologic confirmation of endometriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18462722      PMCID: PMC2629050          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  21 in total

1.  ACOG practice bulletin. Medical management of endometriosis. Number 11, December 1999 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 184, September 1993). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Endometriosis: correlation between histologic and visual findings at laparoscopy.

Authors:  Daniel Clyde Martin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  The epidemiology of endometriosis.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Typical and subtle atypical presentations of endometriosis.

Authors:  Jacques Donnez; Jean Squifflet; Françoise Casanas-Roux; Céline Pirard; Pascale Jadoul; Anne Van Langendonckt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 5.  Typical and subtle atypical presentations of endometriosis.

Authors:  Jacques Donnez; Anne Van Langendonckt
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 6.  Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review.

Authors:  Karen Kinkel; Kathrin A Frei; Corinne Balleyguier; Charles Chapron
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Location, color, size, depth, and volume may predict endometriosis in lesions resected at surgery.

Authors:  Pamela Stratton; Craig A Winkel; Ninet Sinaii; Maria J Merino; Carolyn Zimmer; Lynnette K Nieman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologic examination for the detection of endometriosis.

Authors:  Pamela Stratton; Craig Winkel; Ahalya Premkumar; Catherine Chow; Jan Wilson; Rhonda Hearns-Stokes; Sunyeong Heo; Maria Merino; Lynnette K Nieman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The diagnostic dilemma of minimal and mild endometriosis under routine conditions.

Authors:  O Buchweitz; T Poel; K Diedrich; E Malik
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2003-02

Review 10.  Non-invasive methods of diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Ivo Brosens; Patrick Puttemans; Rudi Campo; Stephan Gordts; Jan Brosens
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.927

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 2.  Chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: translational evidence of the relationship and implications.

Authors:  Pamela Stratton; Karen J Berkley
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Prostaglandin levels, vaginal innervation, and cyst innervation as peripheral contributors to endometriosis-associated vaginal hyperalgesia in rodents.

Authors:  Stacy L McAllister; Barbra K Giourgas; Elizabeth K Faircloth; Emma Leishman; Heather B Bradshaw; Eric R Gross
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 4.  Clinical use of artificial intelligence in endometriosis: a scoping review.

Authors:  Brintha Sivajohan; Mohamed Elgendi; Carlo Menon; Catherine Allaire; Paul Yong; Mohamed A Bedaiwy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  A new validated screening method for endometriosis diagnosis based on patient questionnaires.

Authors:  Charles Chapron; Marie-Christine Lafay-Pillet; Pietro Santulli; Mathilde Bourdon; Chloé Maignien; Antoine Gaudet-Chardonnet; Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet; Bruno Borghese; Louis Marcellin
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-01-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.