Literature DB >> 27176309

Evolutionary mixed games in structured populations: Cooperation and the benefits of heterogeneity.

Marco A Amaral1, Lucas Wardil2, Matjaž Perc3,4, Jafferson K L da Silva1.   

Abstract

Evolutionary games on networks traditionally involve the same game at each interaction. Here we depart from this assumption by considering mixed games, where the game played at each interaction is drawn uniformly at random from a set of two different games. While in well-mixed populations the random mixture of the two games is always equivalent to the average single game, in structured populations this is not always the case. We show that the outcome is, in fact, strongly dependent on the distance of separation of the two games in the parameter space. Effectively, this distance introduces payoff heterogeneity, and the average game is returned only if the heterogeneity is small. For higher levels of heterogeneity the distance to the average game grows, which often involves the promotion of cooperation. The presented results support preceding research that highlights the favorable role of heterogeneity regardless of its origin, and they also emphasize the importance of the population structure in amplifying facilitators of cooperation.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27176309     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.042304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E        ISSN: 2470-0045            Impact factor:   2.529


  10 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in evolutionary games: an analysis of the risk perception.

Authors:  Marco A Amaral; Marco A Javarone
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Interaction between games give rise to the evolution of moral norms of cooperation.

Authors:  Mohammad Salahshour
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.

Authors:  Joris Broere; Vincent Buskens; Jeroen Weesie; Henk Stoof
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Intermediate Levels of Network Heterogeneity Provide the Best Evolutionary Outcomes.

Authors:  Flávio L Pinheiro; Dominik Hartmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The influence of heterogeneous learning ability on the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Xiaogang Li; Yini Geng; Chen Shen; Lei Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  An experimental study of network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.

Authors:  Joris Broere; Vincent Buskens; Henk Stoof; Angel Sánchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evolution of cooperation in costly institutions exhibits Red Queen and Black Queen dynamics in heterogeneous public goods.

Authors:  Mohammad Salahshour
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-29

8.  Multi-strategy evolutionary games: A Markov chain approach.

Authors:  Mahdi Hajihashemi; Keivan Aghababaei Samani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Metric clusters in evolutionary games on scale-free networks.

Authors:  Kaj-Kolja Kleineberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Positive interactions may decrease cooperation in social dilemma experiments.

Authors:  Lucas Wardil; Ivair R Silva; Jafferson K L da Silva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.