Literature DB >> 27175619

Septic complication following porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: prosthesis retention management.

Corrado Iaccarino1,2, Pier P Mattogno3,2, Bruno Zanotti4, Silvio Bellocchi5, Angela Verlicchi6, Edoardo Viaroli1,2, Giulia Pastorello1,2, Francesco Sgulò1,2, Reza Ghadirpour1,2, Franco Servadei1,2.   

Abstract

After failing of autologous cranioplasty or when the bone flap is unavailable, the alloplastic (heterologous) materials are the choice for cranial reconstruction. No agreement has been reported about the material with a significant lower risk of septic complications. This is due to extremely heterogeneous prognostic factors related not only to the material used but also to the surgical procedures and/or to the timing of the procedure. More attention should be focused on the material whose characteristic could enable a delay in bacterial colonization, where an antibiotic therapy could be effective, without need of prosthesis removal. Four cases of severe septic complication following cranioplasty with porous hydroxyapatite (HA) prosthesis are presented. Patients were conservatively treated, without heterologous bone flap removal. All of our patients presented reasons for delaying HA cranioplasty removal: patients #1, 3, and 4 had an associated shunted hydrocephalus and the need for not removing the prosthesis was related to the predictable recurrence of overshunting and/or sinking skin flap syndrome. In patient #4, the revision surgery would have also damaged the microvascular flap with latissimus dorsi muscle used by plastic surgeon for skin reconstruction. In patient #2, the patient refused revision surgery. In all cases, systemic and/or radiological signs of infection were observed. In patient #2 the infective process surrounded completely the HA prosthesis, while it was located in the epidural region in patients #1 and 4. In patient #3, a surgical curettage of the infected wound was performed over the HA prosthesis. Following prosthesis retention management with antibiotic therapy, all patients revealed systemic and/or radiological signs of sepsis resolution at follow-up. The possibility to avoid a prosthesis removal with effective antibiotic treatment is mainly due to the combination of three factors: targeted antibiotic therapy, good anatomical area revascularization (resulting of an "in situ" intake of antibiotics), and the biomimetism of HA prosthesis. Further investigations in a larger number of cases need to confirm these observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27175619     DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03721-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci        ISSN: 0390-5616            Impact factor:   2.279


  8 in total

1.  Timing of cranial reconstruction after cranioplasty infections: are we ready for a re-thinking? A comparative analysis of delayed versus immediate cranioplasty after debridement in a series of 48 patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Rienzo; Roberto Colasanti; Maurizio Gladi; Mauro Dobran; Martina Della Costanza; Mara Capece; Salvatore Veccia; Maurizio Iacoangeli
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Management and prevention of cranioplasty infections.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Flavia Fraschetti; Federico Bianchi; Francesca Giovannenze; Massimo Caldarelli; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Custom-made hydroxyapatite for cranial repair in a specific pediatric age group (7-13 years old): a multicenter post-marketing surveillance study.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Luca Massimi; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Federico Bianchi; Angelo Nataloni; Valentina Canella; Massimo Caldarelli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  From Reparative Surgery to Regenerative Surgery: State of the Art of Porous Hydroxyapatite in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Ismail Zaed; Andrea Cardia; Roberto Stefini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty.

Authors:  C Iaccarino; A Kolias; P D Adelson; A M Rubiano; E Viaroli; A Buki; G Cinalli; K Fountas; T Khan; S Signoretti; V Waran; A O Adeleye; R Amorim; A Bertuccio; A Cama; R M Chesnut; P De Bonis; A Estraneo; A Figaji; S I Florian; R Formisano; P Frassanito; C Gatos; A Germanò; C Giussani; I Hossain; P Kasprzak; F La Porta; D Lindner; A I R Maas; W Paiva; P Palma; K B Park; P Peretta; A Pompucci; J Posti; S K Sengupta; A Sinha; V Sinha; R Stefini; G Talamonti; A Tasiou; G Zona; M Zucchelli; P J Hutchinson; F Servadei
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Restoring Facial Contour and Harmony Using Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics.

Authors:  Oromar Moreira Filho; Francisco H L Wykrota; Sonja Ellen Lobo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-08

7.  Subgaleal Effusion and Brain Midline Shift After Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Study Between Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty and Titanium Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Tao Ji; Peiwen Yao; Yu Zeng; Zhouqi Qian; Ke Wang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-21

8.  Management of infected hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: Is salvage feasible?

Authors:  Alessandro Di Rienzo; Roberto Colasanti; Mauro Dobran; Francesco Formica; Martina Della Costanza; Erika Carrassi; Denis Aiudi; Maurizio Iacoangeli
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-06-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.