Literature DB >> 27175279

Low coverage sequencing of three echinoderm genomes: the brittle star Ophionereis fasciata, the sea star Patiriella regularis, and the sea cucumber Australostichopus mollis.

Kyle A Long1, Carlos W Nossa2, Mary A Sewell3, Nicholas H Putnam2, Joseph F Ryan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are five major extant groups of Echinodermata: Crinoidea (feather stars and sea lillies), Ophiuroidea (brittle stars and basket stars), Asteroidea (sea stars), Echinoidea (sea urchins, sea biscuits, and sand dollars), and Holothuroidea (sea cucumbers). These animals are known for their pentaradial symmetry as adults, unique water vascular system, mutable collagenous tissues, and endoskeletons of high magnesium calcite. To our knowledge, the only echinoderm species with a genome sequence available to date is Strongylocentrotus pupuratus (Echinoidea). The availability of additional echinoderm genome sequences is crucial for understanding the biology of these animals.
FINDINGS: Here we present assembled draft genomes of the brittle star Ophionereis fasciata, the sea star Patiriella regularis, and the sea cucumber Australostichopus mollis from Illumina sequence data with coverages of 12.5x, 22.5x, and 21.4x, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These data provide a resource for mining gene superfamilies, identifying non-coding RNAs, confirming gene losses, and designing experimental constructs. They will be important comparative resources for future genomic studies in echinoderms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brittle star; Echinoderms; Genome; Sea cucumber; Sea star

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27175279      PMCID: PMC4863316          DOI: 10.1186/s13742-016-0125-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Data description

Echinodermata consists of five classes: Crinoidea (feather stars and sea lillies), Ophiuroidea (brittle stars and basket stars), Asteroidea (sea stars), Echinoidea (sea urchins, sea biscuits, and sand dollars), and Holothuroidea (sea cucumbers). These animals have a rich fossil record, unique biomechanical properties, experimentally tractable embryos, and as such have been a favorite subject of study for more than 150 years. Along with Hemichordata, Echinodermata form a clade called Ambulacraria that are the sister group of Chordata, which include vertebrates. Echinoderms are easily recognized due to striking synapomorphies. The most obvious is their pentaradial (five-fold) body symmetry that is characteristic of adults (earlier stages exhibit bilateral symmetry). They have a unique water vascular system, which is characterized by canals connecting small tube feet on the lateral side of the animals. The water vascular system is used for essential functions such as feeding, locomotion, waste disposal, and respiration. The “spiny skin” from which these animals get their name is an endoskeleton made up of calcareous plates called ossicles that is composed of high magnesium calcite formed as solid test, plates or ossicles depending on the class of echinoderms. Lastly, the ossicles are connected by ligaments made of collagen that are normally rigid, but may become flexible upon various neuronal stimuli. The vast majority of genomic work thus far has focused on the classic developmental model, the sea urchin Stronglycentrotus purpuratus [1]. The genome of this sea urchin has produced many important findings of great interest, including the discovery of a rearrangement event in evolution that led to an unusual Hox cluster organization [2], a well-characterized gene network for the specification of endoderm and mesoderm [3], and insight into the effect of ocean acidification on biomineralization [4]. More recently the genomes of the sea star Patiria miniata, the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus, the sea cucumber Parastichopus parvimensis, and the brittle star Ophiothrix spiculata have been made available in Echinobase [5]. Here we provide genome sequences from species within three different echinoderm clades: Australostichopus mollis, commonly known as the brown sea cucumber (Fig. 1a), the brittle star Ophionereis fasciata (Fig. 1b), and Patiriella regularis, known as the New Zealand common cushion star (Fig. 1c). These species can be found in the shallow waters surrounding New Zealand.
Fig. 1

Photos of the echinoderm species whose genomes were sequenced in this study (a) Australostichopus mollis, commonly known as the brown sea cucumber; (b) the brittle star Ophionereis fasciata (b), and Patiriella regularis, known as the New Zealand common cushion star. Photo credits: (a) John A. Starmer, (b) Jennifer Howe, Victoria University of Wellington, and (c) username kiwi_kid on flickr (http://tinyurl.com/pregularis)

Photos of the echinoderm species whose genomes were sequenced in this study (a) Australostichopus mollis, commonly known as the brown sea cucumber; (b) the brittle star Ophionereis fasciata (b), and Patiriella regularis, known as the New Zealand common cushion star. Photo credits: (a) John A. Starmer, (b) Jennifer Howe, Victoria University of Wellington, and (c) username kiwi_kid on flickr (http://tinyurl.com/pregularis) These data can be used for the gene family phylogenetic analyses, domain/gene losses, and presence of small non-coding RNAs among other applications (e.g., [6]). They will be particularly useful in a comparative framework with existing Echinoderm genomes, for example to identify highly conserved non-coding regions. Finally, these data will be a key resource for labs working on these animals in the lab or in the field (e.g., designing markers, probes, and genome-editing constructs).

Sample preparation and sequencing

Raw sequence data for all three species were produced from a single male, a single female, and the offspring of these two adults (Additional file 1: Table S1). For each individual sequenced, reads were barcoded and raw reads were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) separately (Additional file 2: Table S2). This sequencing strategy was originally used in order to employ a genetic mapping approach to genome assembly [7], and is not ideal for the standard de novo assembly strategy described herein. Nevertheless, when it became apparent that genetic mapping approach would not be feasible due to personnel, we applied a more traditional approach, and generated a useful set of data. Parental tissue and larvae from each species were stored in ethanol prior to DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using Zymo DNA clean kit and was used to prepare Nextera libraries for 2 × 100 PE (paired end) sequencing on Illumina HiSeq2000 at BGI Shenzhen.

Assembly

For all steps of the assembly, all reads from each species were pooled (i.e., 2 parents and offspring). We used ALLPATHS-LG v44837 [8] to correct errors in the raw reads. We used Cutadapt v1.4.2 [9] to remove adapter sequences. We assembled these data using three assemblers: SOAPdenovo2 r2.04 [10], ABySS 3.81 [11], and Platanus 1.1.2 [12]. For each program we used a range of k-mer values: 31, 39, 45, 55, 63 for SOAP and ABySS, and 32, 39, 45, 55, 64 for Platanus. This provided a total of 15 assemblies for each organism. Each assembly/k-mer combination was evaluated using N50 values and number of conserved eukaryotic genes recovered by CEGMA 2.4 [13]. In all cases, SOAPdenovo assemblies were deemed superior to those produced by ABySS and Platanus (Table 1). The sequences represent coverages of 12.5x, 22.5x, and 21.4x for the brittle star, sea star, and sea cucumber, respectively.
Table 1

N50 values and CEGMA scores for each Assembly

SpeciesAssemblerK-mer ValueN50 (bp)# ContigsCEGMA Score (Partial/Complete)
O. fasciata SOAPdenovo 314843,968,28269/16
394514,740,14069/17
45 501 4,814,066 71/20
554495,961,78263/9
635284,184,86357/5
ABySS317032,912,85934/6
399924,109,26532/1
4511619,642,98126/1
5514618,334,2630/0
6316613,153,7320/0
Platanus321031260/0
391041290/0
451081190/0
551051300/0
641111190/0
P. regularis SOAPdenovo 31138319,7281/0
394692,348,23717/1
454882,596,70715/0
554703,424,05222/1
63 557 3,006,458 50/2
ABySS317014,653,94712/1
399611,632,45614/2
451169,818,77315/3
551586,986,93522/3
631915,068,07519/4
Platanus321551,923,4050/0
391572,475,1100/0
451612,814,1060/0
551583,044,9900/0
641433,092,8620/0
A. mollis SOAPdenovo 318472,132,88077/16
395643,162,37262/12
455773,457,71066/13
554754,839,37966/17
63 626 3,712,641 87/18
ABySS317619,911,84444/5
3910415,084,41748/5
4512712,518,44352/7
551718,798,22542/5
632046,232,95532/0
Platanus322142,653,8800/0
391823,763,3870/0
451644,653,3060/0
551041020/0
64106990/0

Assemblies deemed to be the best for each species based on N50 and CEGMA scores are in bold and were used for all downstream analyses

N50 values and CEGMA scores for each Assembly Assemblies deemed to be the best for each species based on N50 and CEGMA scores are in bold and were used for all downstream analyses

Gene prediction

We used Augustus v3.0.3 [14] to generate ab initio gene predictions for the best assemblies of each of the echinoderm species. We created a training set with the Strongylocentrotus purpuratus v3.1 scaffolds and corresponding predicted gene models from Echinobase [5]. We used “generic,” “human,” and the custom model “strongylocentrotus_purpuratus” as values for the -species parameter. To compare the three different sets of gene predictions we BLASTed both human and S. purpuratus protein models against the protein predictions from Augustus using BLASTP v2.2.31+ [15] with an E-value cutoff of 1e-6 and limiting to a single target sequence (blastp -query query.fa -db aug.fa -evalue 1e-6 -outfmt 6 -max_target_seqs 1). For all species BLAST searches against the Augustus protein sequences generated with the custom S. purpuratus model resulted in the most hits (Additional file 3: Table S3). We therefore chose these predictions as our final sets. We generated 49,301 A. mollis, 102,838 O. fasciata, and 1135 P. regularis gene predictions (Additional file 4: Table S4). In the case of A. mollis and O. casciata these numbers are substantially higher than the 22,709 published S. purpuratus gene models. The high number in A. mollis and O. casciata might be due to multiple fragmented predictions representing single genes. P. regularis has substantially fewer predictions, which might suggest that in most cases, the scaffolds were too short even to predict partial genes.

Data availability

All data including sequencing reads and assemblies have been submitted to the ENA under the following project accessions: Australostichopus mollis = PRJEB10682; Patiriella regularis = PRJEB10600; Ophionereis fasciata = PRJEB10339. Supporting data is also archived in the GigaScience GigaDB database [16], and additional resources are available from http://ryanlab.whitney.ufl.edu/genomes/.
  15 in total

1.  Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin hox cluster.

Authors:  R Andrew Cameron; Lee Rowen; Ryan Nesbitt; Scott Bloom; Jonathan P Rast; Kevin Berney; Cesar Arenas-Mena; Pedro Martinez; Susan Lucas; Paul M Richardson; Eric H Davidson; Kevin J Peterson; Leroy Hood
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Genis Parra; Keith Bradnam; Ian Korf
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Natural variation and the capacity to adapt to ocean acidification in the keystone sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  Morgan W Kelly; Jacqueline L Padilla-Gamiño; Gretchen E Hofmann
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Current Status of Echinoderm Genome Analysis - What do we Know?

Authors:  Mariko Kondo; Koji Akasaka
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.236

5.  AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints.

Authors:  Mario Stanke; Burkhard Morgenstern
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Joint assembly and genetic mapping of the Atlantic horseshoe crab genome reveals ancient whole genome duplication.

Authors:  Carlos W Nossa; Paul Havlak; Jia-Xing Yue; Jie Lv; Kimberly Y Vincent; H Jane Brockmann; Nicholas H Putnam
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Efficient de novo assembly of highly heterozygous genomes from whole-genome shotgun short reads.

Authors:  Rei Kajitani; Kouta Toshimoto; Hideki Noguchi; Atsushi Toyoda; Yoshitoshi Ogura; Miki Okuno; Mitsuru Yabana; Masayuki Harada; Eiji Nagayasu; Haruhiko Maruyama; Yuji Kohara; Asao Fujiyama; Tetsuya Hayashi; Takehiko Itoh
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Low coverage sequencing of three echinoderm genomes: the brittle star Ophionereis fasciata, the sea star Patiriella regularis, and the sea cucumber Australostichopus mollis.

Authors:  Kyle A Long; Carlos W Nossa; Mary A Sewell; Nicholas H Putnam; Joseph F Ryan
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  SpBase: the sea urchin genome database and web site.

Authors:  R Andrew Cameron; Manoj Samanta; Autumn Yuan; Dong He; Eric Davidson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

View more
  10 in total

1.  Architecture and evolution of the cis-regulatory system of the echinoderm kirrelL gene.

Authors:  Jian Ming Khor; Charles A Ettensohn
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Low coverage sequencing of three echinoderm genomes: the brittle star Ophionereis fasciata, the sea star Patiriella regularis, and the sea cucumber Australostichopus mollis.

Authors:  Kyle A Long; Carlos W Nossa; Mary A Sewell; Nicholas H Putnam; Joseph F Ryan
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.524

3.  High-throughput targeted screening in triple-negative breast cancer cells identifies Wnt-inhibiting activities in Pacific brittle stars.

Authors:  Artem Blagodatski; Vsevolod Cherepanov; Alexey Koval; Vladimir I Kharlamenko; Yuri S Khotimchenko; Vladimir L Katanaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The complex simplicity of the brittle star nervous system.

Authors:  Olga Zueva; Maleana Khoury; Thomas Heinzeller; Daria Mashanova; Vladimir Mashanov
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Draft genome of the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus and genetic polymorphism among color variants.

Authors:  Jihoon Jo; Jooseong Oh; Hyun-Gwan Lee; Hyun-Hee Hong; Sung-Gwon Lee; Seongmin Cheon; Elizabeth M A Kern; Soyeong Jin; Sung-Jin Cho; Joong-Ki Park; Chungoo Park
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  Ancient Origin of the CARD-Coiled Coil/Bcl10/MALT1-Like Paracaspase Signaling Complex Indicates Unknown Critical Functions.

Authors:  Jens Staal; Yasmine Driege; Mira Haegman; Alice Borghi; Paco Hulpiau; Laurens Lievens; Ismail Sahin Gul; Srividhya Sundararaman; Amanda Gonçalves; Ineke Dhondt; Jorge H Pinzón; Bart P Braeckman; Ulrich Technau; Yvan Saeys; Frans van Roy; Rudi Beyaert
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Sea cucumber genome provides insights into saponin biosynthesis and aestivation regulation.

Authors:  Yuli Li; Ruijia Wang; Xiaogang Xun; Jing Wang; Lisui Bao; Ramesha Thimmappa; Jun Ding; Jingwei Jiang; Liheng Zhang; Tianqi Li; Jia Lv; Chuang Mu; Xiaoli Hu; Lingling Zhang; Jing Liu; Yuqiang Li; Lijie Yao; Wenqian Jiao; Yangfan Wang; Shanshan Lian; Zelong Zhao; Yaoyao Zhan; Xiaoting Huang; Huan Liao; Jia Wang; Hongzhen Sun; Xue Mi; Yu Xia; Qiang Xing; Wei Lu; Anne Osbourn; Zunchun Zhou; Yaqing Chang; Zhenmin Bao; Shi Wang
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 38.079

8.  Twinkle twinkle brittle star: the draft genome of Ophioderma brevispinum (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) as a resource for regeneration research.

Authors:  Vladimir Mashanov; Denis Jacob Machado; Robert Reid; Cory Brouwer; Janice Kofsky; Daniel A Janies
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.547

9.  A Chromosome-level Genome Assembly of the Highly Heterozygous Sea Urchin Echinometra sp. EZ Reveals Adaptation in the Regulatory Regions of Stress Response Genes.

Authors:  Remi N Ketchum; Phillip L Davidson; Edward G Smith; Gregory A Wray; John A Burt; Joseph F Ryan; Adam M Reitzel
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.065

Review 10.  An Organismal Model for Gene Regulatory Networks in the Gut-Associated Immune Response.

Authors:  Katherine M Buckley; Jonathan P Rast
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.