Chelsie M Young1, Clayton Neighbors1, Angelo M DiBello2, Carla Sharp1, Michael J Zvolensky1,3, Melissa A Lewis4. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas. 2. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions have received empirical support, are presumed to work by reducing normative misperceptions, and have been found to be particularly efficacious for those who drink for social reasons. However, PNF interventions also offer direct comparisons between one's own drinking and normative drinking, which may be especially important for coping drinkers. The present research evaluated whether reduced perceived norms and drinking at follow-ups varied as a function of coping motives. METHOD: Aims were examined as a secondary analysis of a PNF intervention study among 252 U.S. college students. Following baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned to receive PNF or assessment only. Follow-up assessments occurred 3 and 6 months after baseline. RESULTS: Findings indicated that the PNF intervention was more effective at both follow-ups in reducing drinking, but not alcohol use problems, for participants scoring higher in coping motives. Furthermore, coping motives were the only drinking motive that uniquely moderated PNF efficacy. Analyses indicated that intervention effects on drinking varied as a function of coping drinking motives; however, intervention effects on norms did not vary by coping motives. Finally, coping motives were found to moderate associations between perceived norms and drinking. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that coping motives may be useful for identifying young adults-and presumably others-who can most benefit from PNF approaches. Furthermore, PNF may influence future drinking behavior through mechanisms other than changes in perceived norms. Future investigations could examine other pathways through which PNF may reduce drinking.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions have received empirical support, are presumed to work by reducing normative misperceptions, and have been found to be particularly efficacious for those who drink for social reasons. However, PNF interventions also offer direct comparisons between one's own drinking and normative drinking, which may be especially important for coping drinkers. The present research evaluated whether reduced perceived norms and drinking at follow-ups varied as a function of coping motives. METHOD: Aims were examined as a secondary analysis of a PNF intervention study among 252 U.S. college students. Following baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned to receive PNF or assessment only. Follow-up assessments occurred 3 and 6 months after baseline. RESULTS: Findings indicated that the PNF intervention was more effective at both follow-ups in reducing drinking, but not alcohol use problems, for participants scoring higher in coping motives. Furthermore, coping motives were the only drinking motive that uniquely moderated PNF efficacy. Analyses indicated that intervention effects on drinking varied as a function of coping drinking motives; however, intervention effects on norms did not vary by coping motives. Finally, coping motives were found to moderate associations between perceived norms and drinking. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that coping motives may be useful for identifying young adults-and presumably others-who can most benefit from PNF approaches. Furthermore, PNF may influence future drinking behavior through mechanisms other than changes in perceived norms. Future investigations could examine other pathways through which PNF may reduce drinking.
Authors: Anna E Jaffe; Jessica A Blayney; Scott Graupensperger; Cynthia A Stappenbeck; Michele Bedard-Gilligan; Mary Larimer Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2021-08-26
Authors: John A Cunningham; Christian S Hendershot; Frances Kay-Lambkin; Clayton Neighbors; Kathleen M Griffiths; Kylie Bennett; Anthony Bennett; Alexandra Godinho; Christina Schell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 2.692