Literature DB >> 27171678

Patterns of genome size variation in snapping shrimp.

Nicholas W Jeffery1, Kristin Hultgren2, Solomon Tin Chi Chak3, T Ryan Gregory1, Dustin R Rubenstein4,5.   

Abstract

Although crustaceans vary extensively in genome size, little is known about how genome size may affect the ecology and evolution of species in this diverse group, in part due to the lack of large genome size datasets. Here we investigate interspecific, intraspecific, and intracolony variation in genome size in 39 species of Synalpheus shrimps, representing one of the largest genome size datasets for a single genus within crustaceans. We find that genome size ranges approximately 4-fold across Synalpheus with little phylogenetic signal, and is not related to body size. In a subset of these species, genome size is related to chromosome size, but not to chromosome number, suggesting that despite large genomes, these species are not polyploid. Interestingly, there appears to be 35% intraspecific genome size variation in Synalpheus idios among geographic regions, and up to 30% variation in Synalpheus duffyi genome size within the same colony.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-value; Synalpheus; chromosome; duplication génique; gene duplication; genome size; polyploidy; polyploïdie; taille du génome; valeur C

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27171678     DOI: 10.1139/gen-2015-0206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  15 in total

1.  Substantial intraspecific genome size variation in golden-brown algae and its phenotypic consequences.

Authors:  Dora Čertnerová; Pavel Škaloud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Genome size estimation of brackishwater fishes and penaeid shrimps by flow cytometry.

Authors:  A Swathi; M S Shekhar; Vinaya Kumar Katneni; K K Vijayan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Linking genome size variation to population phenotypic variation within the rotifer, Brachionus asplanchnoidis.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer; Maria Pichler; Anita Hatheuer
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-19

4.  Eusociality in snapping shrimps is associated with larger genomes and an accumulation of transposable elements.

Authors:  Solomon T C Chak; Stephen E Harris; Kristin M Hultgren; Nicholas W Jeffery; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genome size in arthropods; different roles of phylogeny, habitat and life history in insects and crustaceans.

Authors:  Kristian Alfsnes; Hans Petter Leinaas; Dag Olav Hessen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the eusocial sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp Synalpheus microneptunus.

Authors:  Phillip Barden; J Antonio Baeza; Solomon T C Chak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Small, but surprisingly repetitive genomes: transposon expansion and not polyploidy has driven a doubling in genome size in a metazoan species complex.

Authors:  J Blommaert; S Riss; B Hecox-Lea; D B Mark Welch; C P Stelzer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Genome Size Evolution Differs Between Drosophila Subgenera with Striking Differences in Male and Female Genome Size in Sophophora.

Authors:  Carl E Hjelmen; Heath Blackmon; V Renee Holmes; Crystal G Burrus; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genome Sequences of Marine Shrimp Exopalaemon carinicauda Holthuis Provide Insights into Genome Size Evolution of Caridea.

Authors:  Jianbo Yuan; Yi Gao; Xiaojun Zhang; Jiankai Wei; Chengzhang Liu; Fuhua Li; Jianhai Xiang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Within-Population Genome Size Variation is Mediated by Multiple Genomic Elements That Segregate Independently during Meiosis.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer; Maria Pichler; Peter Stadler; Anita Hatheuer; Simone Riss
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.