| Literature DB >> 27171381 |
Hannah R Windley1, Mandy C Barron2, E Penelope Holland2, Danswell Starrs1, Wendy A Ruscoe2, William J Foley1.
Abstract
Introduced herbivores frequently inflict significant, yet patchy damage on native ecosystems through selective browsing. However, there are few instances where the underlying cause of this patchy damage has been revealed. We aimed to determine if the nutritional quality of foliage could predict the browsing preferences of an invasive mammalian herbivore, the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), in a temperate forest in New Zealand. We quantified the spatial and temporal variation in four key aspects of the foliar chemistry (total nitrogen, available nitrogen, in vitro dry matter digestibility and tannin effect) of 275 trees representing five native tree species. Simultaneously, we assessed the severity of browsing damage caused by possums on those trees in order to relate selective browsing to foliar nutritional quality. We found significant spatial and temporal variation in nutritional quality among individuals of each tree species examined, as well as among tree species. There was a positive relationship between the available nitrogen concentration of foliage (a measure of in vitro digestible protein) and the severity of damage caused by browsing by possums. This study highlights the importance of nutritional quality, specifically, the foliar available nitrogen concentration of individual trees, in predicting the impact of an invasive mammal. Revealing the underlying cause of patchy browsing by an invasive mammal provides new insights for conservation of native forests and targeted control of invasive herbivores in forest ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27171381 PMCID: PMC4865184 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Nutritional characteristics of foliage.
Box and whisker plots of measured a) available nitrogen, b) total nitrogen (N), c) tannin effect and d) dry matter digestibility of foliage from five tree species in the Tararua Mountain Range, New Zealand). Letters denote significant differences between species (Tukey HSD). (n = 1111).
Summary of model selection.
| a) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -533.45 | 5 | |||
| Season | -511.96 | 8 | 3 | 42.978 | <0.001 |
| Season + Species | -497.07 | 11 | 3 | 29.779 | <0.001 |
| Season + Species + Control | -492.86 | 12 | 1 | 8.4177 | 0.004 |
| Season + Species + Control + AvailN | -489.77 | 13 | 1 | 6.1743 | 0.013 |
| Season + Species + Control + AvailN + AvailN * Season | -483.01 | 16 | 3 | 13.582 | 0.004 |
| Season + Species + Control + AvailN + AvailN * Season + Season * Control | -475.64 | 19 | 3 | 14.734 | 0.002 |
| b) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -533.45 | 5 | |||
| Season | -511.96 | 8 | 3 | 42.98 | <0.001 |
| Season + Species | -497.07 | 11 | 3 | 29.78 | <0.001 |
| Season+Species+N | -491.89 | 12 | 1 | 10.35 | 0.001 |
| Season+Species+N+Control | -487.71 | 13 | 1 | 8.38 | 0.003 |
| Season+Species+N+Control+Season*Species | -475.51 | 22 | 9 | 24.39 | 0.004 |
| Season+Species+N+Control+Season*Species+Season*Control | -468.85 | 25 | 3 | 13.33 | 0.004 |
| Season+Species+N+Control+Season*Species+Season*Control+Species*Control | -463.05 | 28 | 3 | 11.58 | 0.009 |
| c) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -533.45 | 5 | |||
| Season | -511.96 | 8 | 3 | 42.98 | <0.001 |
| Season + Species | -497.07 | 11 | 3 | 29.78 | <0.001 |
| Season+Species+Control | -492.86 | 12 | 1 | 8.42 | 0.004 |
| Season+Species+Control+Season*Species | -481.47 | 21 | 9 | 22.78 | 0.007 |
| Season+Species+Control+Season*Species+Season*Control | -474.84 | 24 | 3 | 13.25 | 0.004 |
| d) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -533.45 | 5 | |||
| Season | -511.96 | 8 | 3 | 42.98 | <0.001 |
| Season + Species | -497.07 | 11 | 3 | 29.78 | <0.001 |
| Season+Species+Control | -492.86 | 12 | 1 | 8.42 | 0.004 |
| Season+Species+Control+Season*Species | -481.47 | 21 | 9 | 22.78 | 0.007 |
| Season+Species+Control+Season*Species+Season*Control | -474.84 | 24 | 3 | 13.25 | 0.004 |
Summary of forward model selection of cumulative link mixed effects model for possum browsing as a function of environmental and nutritional factors using log ratio statistics. Explanatory variables were added to the null model of Browse ~ 1 in turn, and the variable with the most explanatory power (determined by log ratio statistic) retained, and the procedure repeated with remaining, unfitted variables. The random factors (Plot, and tree, nested within Plot) were present in all models. The term k refers to the number of coefficients in the model; LR. df is the log ratio statistic degrees of freedom. LR stat. is the log ratio statistic; P is the P value associated with the log ratio statistic where a P value <0.05 indicates a significant difference between the model and the preceding model (i.e., a significant improvement in the model). The final model is highlighted in bold, defined by the condition that the addition of no other variables or interaction terms produced a significant improvement in model fit.
Summary of model coefficients.
| Summer | -0.445 | 0.595 | -0.749 | 0.454 |
| Autumn | -0.264 | 0.596 | -0.413 | 0.679 |
| Spring 2011 | 0.804 | 0.706 | 1.138 | 0.255 |
| mahoe | -0.343 | 1.733 | -0.198 | 0.843 |
| ControlY | -0.305 | 1.226 | -0.249 | 0.804 |
| Summer *AvailN | -0.116 | 0.712 | -0.163 | 0.871 |
| Autumn *AvailN | -0.812 | 0.730 | -1.119 | 0.263 |
| Summer*Control | -0.663 | 0.558 | -1.188 | 0.235 |
| Autumn *Control | -0.633 | 0.557 | -0.114 | 0.910 |
| kamahi *Control | -1.714 | 1.275 | -1.344 | 0.179 |
| mahoe *Control | -0.496 | 1.665 | -0.298 | 0.766 |
| toro *Control | 1.473 | 1.428 | 1.032 | 0.302 |
| Plot | 0.383 | |||
| Plot/Tree | 2.96 |
Summary of model coefficients from cumulative link mixed effects modelling exploring the fixed effects of season, species, possum control, AvailN and significant interactions, on severity of possum browse. Note: Spring 2010, hinau and non-control zone are the reference levels for their respective factor. Hence, significant differences (marked in bold text) refer to significant differences from reference levels. Estimate is the coefficient estimate; SE is the standard error of the estimate; Wald Z is the Wald Z statistic; P is the P value associated with the Wald Z statistic. Significant differences from the reference condition are denoted by bold case.
Summary of model selection, possum browsing on kamahi at Line 2.
| a) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -285.15 | 5 | |||
| Season | -272.98 | 8 | 3 | 24.34 | |
| Season +AvailN | -266.07 | 9 | 1 | 13.84 | |
| b) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -285.15 | 5 | |||
| Season | -272.98 | 8 | 3 | 24.34 | <0.001 |
| Season + N | -261.69 | 9 | 1 | 22.6 | <0.001 |
| c) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -285.15 | 5 | |||
| Season | -272.98 | 8 | 3 | 24.34 | <0.001 |
| d) | |||||
| Intercept (Null model) | -285.15 | 5 | |||
| Season | -272.98 | 8 | 3 | 24.34 | <0.001 |
Summary of model selection using log ratio statistics, for cumulative link mixed effects modelling of severity of possum browsing on kamahi at line 2. Explanatory variables (season, control, TBA and nutritional variable; a) availN, b) total N, c) tannin effect and d) DMD) were added to the null model of Browse ~ 1 in turn, and the variable with the most explanatory power (determined by log ratio statistic) retained, and the procedure repeated with remaining, unfitted variables. Only the significant model after each iteration is shown (i.e., insignificant models are not shown). The random factors (plot, and tree, nested within plot) were present in all models. The term k refers to the number of coefficients in the model LR.df is the log ratio statistic degrees of freedom LR stat. is the log ratio statistic. P is the P value associated with the log ratio statistic where a P value <0.05 indicates a significant difference between the model and the preceding model (i.e., a significant improvement in the model). The final model is highlighted in bold, defined by the condition that the addition of no other variables or interaction terms produced a significant improvement in model fit.
Fig 2Relationship between kamahi foliar AvailN and possum browse category.
Relationship between the available nitrogen concentration (mean ± SE) of kamahi foliage and possum browse category at Line 2 for trees in possum control zone (open circles) and non-control zone (closed circles) during a) Spring 2010; b) Summer 2011; c) Autumn 2011; d) Spring 2011. Note the single data point in panel c for the moderate browse category.
Summary of model coefficients, possum browsing on kamahi at Line 2.
| Summer | -0.693 | 0.370 | -1.87 | 0.060 |
| Autumn | -0.934 | 0.386 | -2.43 | |
| Spring 2011 | -1.928 | 0.407 | -4.74 | |
| AvailN | 8.067 | 1.971 | 4.09 | |
| Control | -2.289 | 0.567 | -4.04 | |
| Plot | 0.60 | |||
| Plot/Tree | 1.06 |
Summary of model coefficients from cumulative link mixed effects modelling exploring the fixed effects of season, AvailN and possum control on the severity of browsing by possums on kamahi on Line 2. Note: Spring 2010 and non-control zone are the reference levels. Hence, significant differences (marked in bold text) refer to significant differences from reference levels. Estimate is the coefficient estimate; SE is the standard error of the estimate; Wald Z is the Wald Z statistic; P is the P value associated with the Wald Z statistic. Significant differences from the reference condition are denoted by bold case of the P value.
Fig 3Observations of browsing by possums on kamahi.
Proportion of kamahi observations within each browse category for each season in non-control (a) and control (b) zones in the Tararua Mountain Range. The black bar represents the proportion of trees in the heavy browse category, dark grey represents moderate browsing by possums, light grey is light browsing and white represents the proportion of trees with no browsing observed. Also shown, average bite mark index, BMI (filled circles) ± SE (error bars), as a proxy for possum abundance in each season and each control zone. Browse data presented is for 63 kamahi trees at Line 2. BMI data presented is the average BMI per season from ten wax tag transects (20 wax tags per transect) positioned along Line 2.
Fig 4Probability of severity of browsing by possums on kamahi.
Modelled probability of severity of browsing by possums on kamahi foliage in response to foliar available nitrogen concentration at Line 2, Tararua Mountain Range. The dotted line represents the probability of no browsing by possums occurring, the short dash is light browse, long dash is moderate browse and solid line is heavy browsing. The figure shows the model for reference levels (Spring 2010, non-control zone; Table 4). Grey boxes denote values beyond the range of available nitrogen observed for kamahi foliage at line 2 in the study (0.20%–0.76%).