| Literature DB >> 27171077 |
Na Lu1, Jun-Hui Chen2, Dong Wei3, Feng Chen4,5, Gu Chen6.
Abstract
In the present work, <span class="Species">Chlamydomonas nivalis, a model species of snow <span class="Species">algae, was used to illustrate the metabolic regulation mechanism of microalgae under nutrient deprivation stress. The seed culture was inoculated into the medium without nitrate or phosphate to reveal the cell responses by a metabolome profile analysis using gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC/TOF-MS). One hundred and seventy-one of the identified metabolites clustered into five groups by the orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) model. Among them, thirty of the metabolites in the nitrate-deprived group and thirty-nine of the metabolites in the phosphate-deprived group were selected and identified as "responding biomarkers" by this metabolomic approach. A significant change in the abundance of biomarkers indicated that the enhanced biosynthesis of carbohydrates and fatty acids coupled with the decreased biosynthesis of amino acids, N-compounds and organic acids in all the stress groups. The up- or down-regulation of these biomarkers in the metabolic network provides new insights into the global metabolic regulation and internal relationships within amino acid and fatty acid synthesis, glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) and the Calvin cycle in the snow alga under nitrate or phosphate deprivation stress.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydomonas nivalis; GC/TOF-MS; OPLS-DA; metabolome profile; nutrient deprivation; responding biomarker
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27171077 PMCID: PMC4881520 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17050694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Overview of the identified metabolites in the classes and their abundance in the stress groups and the control group. *, ** mean significant difference (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01).
Figure 2Score scatter plot generated by the orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) model from the peak area of the identified metabolites in the different groups. (▲) the control; (■) nitrate deprivation for 6 and 12 h; (□) nitrate deprivation for 24, 48 and 72 h; (◆) phosphate deprivation for 6 and 12 h; (◇) phosphate deprivation for 24, 48 and 72 h. t[1], the score of the first predictive component to explain the largest variation; t[2], the score of the first orthogonal component to explain the largest orthogonal variation.
Figure 3Related plots of the OPLS-DA model between the nitrate-deprived group and the control. (a) Score scatter plot for metabolite discrimination. (▲) the control; (■) nitrate-deprived group for 6 and 12 h; (□) nitrate-deprived group for 24, 48 and 72 h; (b) VIP plot (with VIP > 1 metabolites); (c) s-plot; square marked metabolites are those with |p(corr)| > 0.6; (d) Loading column plot of the potential metabolites biomarkers.
Figure 4Related plots of the OPLS-DA model between the phosphate-deprived group and the control. (a) Score scatter plot for metabolite discrimination. (▲) the control; (◆) phosphate-deprived group for 6 and 12 h; (◇) phosphate-deprived group for 24, 48 and 72 h; (b) VIP plot (with VIP > 1 metabolites); (c) s-plot; square marked metabolites are those with |p(corr)| > 0.6; (d) Loading column plot of the potential metabolites biomarkers.
Thirty of the selected metabolites with a VIP > 1 and a |p (corr)| > 0.6 as responding biomarkers from the nitrate-deprived group vs. the control group.
| Number | Identified Metabolites | VIP | Change Rate in Abundance, % (N Deprivation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linolenic acid | 5.48 | 0.22 | 0.65 | 5.13 |
| 2 | α-Ketoglutaric acid | 3.24 | 0.28 | 0.94 | −55.11 |
| 3 | Stearic acid | 2.60 | −0.20 | −0.88 | 67.15 |
| 4 | Putrescine | 2.48 | 0.24 | 0.97 | −29.31 |
| 5 | Glutamine | 2.42 | 0.22 | 0.95 | −21.44 |
| 6 | Asparagine | 2.33 | 0.20 | 0.93 | −58.90 |
| 7 | Palmitic acid | 2.01 | −0.20 | −0.97 | 67.00 |
| 8 | Uracil | 1.92 | 0.20 | 0.99 | −11.27 |
| 9 | Adenosine | 1.87 | 0.16 | 0.93 | −28.98 |
| 10 | Glutamic acid | 1.86 | 0.18 | 0.97 | −35.24 |
| 11 | Nicotinamide | 1.75 | 0.19 | 0.99 | −8.17 |
| 12 | Adenine | 1.74 | 0.17 | 0.96 | −30.60 |
| 13 | Succinic acid | 1.71 | 0.17 | 0.94 | 8.36 |
| 14 | Valine | 1.65 | 0.17 | 0.99 | −6.68 |
| 15 | Isoleucine | 1.61 | −0.10 | −0.80 | 75.65 |
| 16 | Trisaccharide | 1.59 | 0.17 | 1.00 | −2.16 |
| 17 | Citric acid | 1.52 | 0.13 | 0.91 | −33.14 |
| 18 | Pentadecanoic acid | 1.45 | −0.13 | −0.95 | 75.54 |
| 19 | Alanine | 1.43 | 0.15 | 0.98 | −56.06 |
| 20 | Malic acid | 1.41 | 0.15 | 0.99 | −11.30 |
| 21 | Fumaric acid | 1.36 | 0.13 | 0.94 | −34.74 |
| 22 | Aspartic acid | 1.35 | 0.11 | 0.92 | −5.22 |
| 23 | Proline | 1.34 | 0.13 | 0.97 | −1.03 |
| 24 | Serine | 1.30 | 0.11 | 0.93 | −9.06 |
| 25 | Phenylalanine | 1.19 | 0.12 | 0.97 | −29.42 |
| 26 | Histidine | 1.13 | −0.12 | −0.99 | 86.94 |
| 27 | Tryptophan | 1.11 | −0.12 | −1.00 | 85.84 |
| 28 | Shikimic acid | 1.11 | 0.12 | 1.00 | −35.76 |
| 29 | Leucine | 1.09 | 0.11 | 0.97 | −27.64 |
| 30 | Lysine | 1.01 | 0.11 | 0.99 | −4.38 |
VIP: variable influence on the projection; p[1]: the loading of the first predictive component to explain the largest variation; p(corr)[1]: the correlation coefficient between the metabolite and the score of the first predictive component to explain the largest variation; N: nitrogen.
Thirty-nine of the selected metabolites with a VIP > 1 and a |p(corr)| > 0.6 as responding biomarkers from the phosphate-deprived group vs. the control group.
| Number | Identified Metabolites | VIP | Change Rate in Abundance, % (P deprivation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linolenic acid | 3.42 | 0.30 | 0.98 | −22.77 |
| 2 | Stearic acid | 2.89 | −0.25 | −0.96 | 47.74 |
| 3 | Trisaccharide | 2.75 | −0.12 | −0.88 | 24.77 |
| 4 | Adenosine | 2.53 | 0.21 | 0.98 | −43.47 |
| 5 | Glutamic acid | 2.49 | 0.21 | 0.97 | 10.29 |
| 6 | α-Ketoglutaric acid | 2.34 | 0.25 | 0.99 | −22.15 |
| 7 | Putrescine | 2.16 | 0.24 | 1.00 | −19.51 |
| 8 | Fumaric acid | 1.84 | 0.17 | 0.99 | −55.15 |
| 9 | Trehalose | 1.81 | 0.10 | 0.93 | −20.32 |
| 10 | Threonic acid | 1.79 | 0.11 | 0.92 | 1.05 |
| 11 | Shikimic acid | 1.75 | 0.14 | 0.97 | −42.50 |
| 12 | Nicotinamide | 1.63 | 0.15 | 0.94 | −3.00 |
| 13 | Valine | 1.60 | 0.15 | 0.98 | −4.15 |
| 14 | Succinic acid | 1.51 | 0.16 | 0.94 | −1.38 |
| 15 | Proline | 1.49 | 0.11 | 0.95 | −1.51 |
| 16 | Aspartic acid | 1.49 | −0.13 | −0.97 | 42.85 |
| 17 | Benzoic acid | 1.48 | 0.05 | 0.64 | 6.81 |
| 18 | Histidine | 1.46 | 0.13 | 0.97 | −23.75 |
| 19 | Uracil | 1.42 | 0.15 | 0.99 | −1.08 |
| 20 | Sucrose | 1.41 | 0.04 | 0.73 | 9.17 |
| 21 | Malic acid | 1.39 | 0.10 | 0.89 | −0.39 |
| 22 | Serine | 1.37 | 0.10 | 0.93 | −5.55 |
| 23 | Threitol | 1.36 | 0.05 | 0.71 | −1.11 |
| 24 | Phenylalanine | 1.35 | 0.15 | 0.99 | −39.56 |
| 25 | Erythronic acid lactone | 1.30 | 0.08 | 0.80 | 1.74 |
| 26 | Leucine | 1.29 | 0.13 | 0.99 | −38.43 |
| 27 | Adenosine-5-phosphate | 1.27 | 0.12 | 0.97 | −4.98 |
| 28 | Palmitic acid | 1.23 | −0.13 | −0.79 | 25.12 |
| 29 | 3-Phosphoglycerate | 1.22 | −0.12 | −0.99 | 297.76 |
| 30 | Fructose-6-phosphate | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.99 | −21.05 |
| 31 | Inositol-4-monophosphate | 1.21 | 0.12 | 0.99 | −37.26 |
| 32 | Alanine | 1.19 | 0.13 | 0.99 | −27.64 |
| 33 | Pyrophosphate | 1.13 | −0.12 | −0.99 | 41.90 |
| 34 | Gluconic acid | 1.09 | 0.08 | 0.93 | −35.19 |
| 35 | Asparagine | 1.09 | 0.12 | 0.99 | −3.23 |
| 36 | Pentadecanoic acid | 1.07 | −0.10 | −0.96 | 32.98 |
| 37 | Tyrosine | 1.02 | 0.10 | 0.97 | 1.73 |
| 38 | Threonine | 1.00 | −0.08 | −0.94 | 23.50 |
| 39 | Cellobiose | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.94 | 8.64 |
VIP: variable influence on the projection; p[1]: the loading of the first predictive component to explain the largest variation; p(corr)[1]: the correlation coefficient between the metabolite and the score of the first predictive component to explain the largest variation; P: phosphate.
Figure 5The abundance in the biomarker classes responding to the stresses compared with the control. *, ** mean significant difference (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01).
Figure 6Metabolic pathway and regulation visualized by Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) under nitrate-deprived stress. Direct connections between the metabolites are indicated with solid line arrows, and putative connections between the metabolites are indicated with dash line arrows. The red words in red solid line boxes represent an increase in the abundance of the responding biomarkers, the blue words in blue dash line boxes represent a decrease in the abundance, and the black words represent no significant change. The percentages represent the change rates of the biomarkers by up- or down-regulation.
Figure 7Metabolic pathway and regulation visualized by KEGG under phosphate-deprived stress. Direct connections between the metabolites are indicated with solid line arrows, and putative connections between the metabolites are indicated with dash line arrows. The red words in red solid line boxes represent an increase in the abundance of the responding biomarkers, the blue words in blue dash line boxes represent a decrease in the abundance, and the black words represent no significant change. The percentages represent the change rates of the responding biomarkers by up- or down-regulation.