| Literature DB >> 27170732 |
Seán McManus1, Noemi Tejera1, Khader Awwad2, David Vauzour3, Neil Rigby4, Ingrid Fleming2, Aedin Cassidy1, Anne Marie Minihane5.
Abstract
Our objective was to investigate the impact of EPA versus DHA on arterial stiffness and reactivity and underlying mechanisms (with a focus on plasma oxylipins) in the postprandial state. In a three-arm crossover acute test meal trial, men (n = 26, 35-55 years) at increased CVD risk received a high-fat (42.4 g) test meal providing 4.16 g of EPA or DHA or control oil in random order. At 0 h and 4 h, blood samples were collected to quantify plasma fatty acids, long chain n-3 PUFA-derived oxylipins, nitrite and hydrogen sulfide, and serum lipids and glucose. Vascular function was assessed using blood pressure, reactive hyperemia index, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index (AIx). The DHA-rich oil significantly reduced AIx by 13% (P = 0.047) with the decrease following EPA-rich oil intervention not reaching statistical significance. Both interventions increased EPA- and DHA-derived oxylipins in the acute postprandial state, with an (1.3-fold) increase in 19,20-dihydroxydocosapentaenoic acid evident after DHA intervention (P < 0.001). In conclusion, a single dose of DHA significantly improved postprandial arterial stiffness as assessed by AIx, which if sustained would be associated with a significant decrease in CVD risk. The observed increases in oxylipins provide a mechanistic insight into the AIx effect.Entities:
Keywords: augmentation index; blood pressure; docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; fish oil; hydrogen sulfide; lipidomics; nitric oxide; nutrition; omega-3 fatty acids; pulse wave velocity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27170732 PMCID: PMC5003154 DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M067801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipid Res ISSN: 0022-2275 Impact factor: 5.922
Study population characteristics (n = 26)
| Characteristic | Value |
| Age (years) | 45 ± 5 (36–54) |
| Weight (kg) | 87.0 ± 11.5 (73.5–129.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.4 ± 3.3 (20.4–39.9) |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 95.5 ± 10.4 (76.8–128.0) |
| TC (mM) | 5.8 ± 0.9 (3.8–7.3) |
| HDL-C (mM) | 1.4 ± 0.3 (0.86–2.32) |
| SBP (mmHg) | 136 ± 10 (101–150) |
| DBP (mmHg) | 86 ± 7 (67–104) |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM with the range of values in brackets.
Vascular measurements at baseline (0 h) and in response to treatment (4 h)
| CO Meal | ERO Meal | DRO Meal | ||||||
| 0 h | 4 h | 0 h | 4 h | 0 h | 4 h | |||
| DBP (mmHg) | 77 ± 1 | 74 ± 2 | 77 ± 2 | 76 ± 2 | 75 ± 1 | 76 ± 1 | 0.25 | 0.15 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 125 ± 3 | 125 ± 2 | 127 ± 2 | 128 ± 2 | 125 ± 2 | 124 ± 1 | 0.93 | 0.38 |
| RHI | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 0.75 | 0.92 |
| RHI*GTN | — | 1.7 ± 0.1 | — | 1.5 ± 0.1 | — | 1.6 ± 0.1 | — | 0.59 |
| PWV (m/s) | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 8.3 ± 0.2 | 8.3 ± 0.1 | 8.4 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 0.85 | 0.32 |
RHI*GTN, RHI after 400 mg of sublingual GTN. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 26).
Two-factor repeated measures ANOVA.
Fig. 1.AIx (%) at baseline and in response to treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 26). Two-factor repeated measures ANOVA. P, time < 0.010; P, time × treatment = 0.005. The asterisk indicates significantly different (P = 0.047) change scores for DRO when compared with CO.
Biochemical measures at baseline and in response to treatment
| CO Meal | ERO Meal | DRO Meal | ||||||
| 0 h | 4 h | 0 h | 4 h | 0 h | 4 h | |||
| Triacylglycerol (mM) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.36 |
| NEFA (μM) | 359 ± 24 | 424 ± 36 | 335 ± 32 | 384 ± 35 | 351 ± 31 | 398 ± 33 | 0.020 | 0.90 |
| Glucose (mM) | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.49 |
| Nitrite (mM) | 88.7 ± 8.6 | 80.1 ± 7.2 | 84.3 ± 6.2 | 74.3 ± 6.5 | 78.4 ± 6.5 | 81.9 ± 0.1 | 0.37 | 0.46 |
| H2S (mM) | 348.3 ± 59.3 | 386.6 ± 62.0 | 369.2 ± 59.6 | 341.7 ± 39.4 | 377.5 ± 63.6 | 386.4 ± 61.1 | 0.76 | 0.35 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 26).
Two-factor repeated measures ANOVA.
Plasma LC n-3 PUFA concentrations along with select hydroxy, epoxide, and diol metabolites measured at baseline and in response to treatment (4 h)
| Control Meal | ERO Meal | DRO Meal | ||||||
| 0 h | 4 h | 0 h | 4 h | 0 h | 4 h | |||
| Fatty acids (mg/ml) | ||||||||
| EPA | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 8.5 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.49 |
| DPA | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.86 | 0.02 |
| DHA | 6.6 ± 0.2 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 7.5 ± 0.2 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 12.0 ± 0.3 | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Oxylipins (ng/ml) | ||||||||
| Hydroxy metabolites | ||||||||
| 15S-HEPE | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| 18S-HEPE | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 6.5 ± 2.3 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 1.6 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| Epoxide metabolites | ||||||||
| 14,15-EpETE | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.001 |
| 17,18-EpETE | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 9.9 ± 1.8 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Diol metabolites | ||||||||
| 14,15-DiHETE | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 17,18-DiHETE | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 9.7 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 19,20-DiHDPA | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
DiHDPA, dihydroxydocosapentaenoic acid; DiHETE, dihydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid; EpETE, epoxyeicosatetraenoic acid; HEPE, hydroxyeicosapentaenoic. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 26).
Two-factor repeated measures ANOVA.
Indicates a significant difference in change from baseline when compared with control.