Literature DB >> 27170528

Spine Kinematics During Prone Extension in People With and Without Low Back Pain and Among Classification-Specific Low Back Pain Subgroups.

Brittney Mazzone, Ron Wood, Sara Gombatto.   

Abstract

Study Design Cross-sectional observational design. Background Spine extension is used in physical therapy during examination and treatment for low back pain (LBP). However, kinematics during prone extension have not been examined using 3-D motion capture. Objectives The primary purpose was to determine differences in spine kinematics during prone extension between subjects with and without LBP. An exploratory analysis was conducted to examine kinematic differences among LBP subgroups. Methods Kinematics of the thoracic and lumbar spine were examined during prone extension, using optical motion capture, in 18 subjects with LBP and 17 subjects without LBP (control group). Excursion of each spinal region was calculated for the entire movement and during 25% increments of extension movement duration. Subjects with LBP were examined and assigned to subgroups using 3 different classification systems for LBP. Repeated-measures analysis-of-variance tests were used to examine effects of group (LBP, control), spine region, and increment of movement duration, and to explore effects of LBP subgroup. Results For spine kinematics, there was a significant group-by-region interaction effect (P<.05). Subjects with LBP displayed less lower lumbar extension (13.3° ± 4.9°) than control subjects (21.4° ± 9.2°). The majority of lower lumbar extension occurred during the first 50% of the motion for subjects with LBP. Subgroup-by-region interaction effects were significant for 2 of 3 LBP classification systems (P<.05). Conclusion Subjects with LBP displayed less lower lumbar extension than control subjects during prone extension. These differences should be considered when evaluating and prescribing prone extension. The interpretation of subgroup differences with prone extension kinematics is limited in the current study by the small sample size, but may need to be considered in future studies of spine kinematics. Level of Evidence Diagnosis, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(7):571-579. Epub 12 May 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6159.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lumbar spine; movement; press-up

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27170528     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  7 in total

1.  Aberrant Lumbopelvic Movements Predict Prospective Functional Decline in Older Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Patrick J Knox; Ryan T Pohlig; Jenifer M Pugliese; Peter C Coyle; Jaclyn M Sions; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Measuring Lumbar Motion Angle With a Small Accelerometer: A Reliability Study.

Authors:  Ryo Miyachi; Ayaka Sano; Nana Tanaka; Misaki Tamai; Junya Miyazaki
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  A comparison of trunk control in people with no history, standing-induced, and recurrent low back pain during trunk extension.

Authors:  Daniel Viggiani; Erika Nelson-Wong; Bradley S Davidson; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-12-12

4.  Differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics in people with and without low back pain during a step-up task: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katie Mitchell; Madeline Porter; Lauren Anderson; Carter Phillips; Grayson Arceo; Brian Montz; Susan Levy; Sara P Gombatto
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes.

Authors:  Shirley Sahrmann; Daniel C Azevedo; Linda Van Dillen
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Does the performance of five back-associated exercises relate to the presence of low back pain? A cross-sectional observational investigation in regional Australian council workers.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Jonathan Hoffman; Jason Osborne; E-Liisa Laakso; Markus Melloh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Analysis of the Active Measurement Systems of the Thoracic Range of Movements of the Spine: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Esteban-González; Eleuterio A Sánchez-Romero; Jorge Hugo Villafañe
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.