Literature DB >> 35747614

Measuring Lumbar Motion Angle With a Small Accelerometer: A Reliability Study.

Ryo Miyachi1, Ayaka Sano2, Nana Tanaka2, Misaki Tamai2, Junya Miyazaki2.   

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the lumbar motion angle using a small accelerometer for movement tests in the sagittal plane, and to determine the number of measurements required to obtain reliable data.
Methods: In total, 102 healthy adults (56% women, 44% men; 20.1 ± 1.1 years of age) participated in this study. The intra- and interexaminer reliability of lumbar motion angle measurements during forward and backward trunk bending and prone hip extension were investigated. Lumbar motion angles were measured with small accelerometers placed at the thoracolumbar transition, lumbosacral transition, and thigh, during motion and at the final position. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 in intraexaminer analyses and from 0.5 to 0.7 in interexaminer analyses. Intraexaminer systematic biases were found only in the maximum angle of trunk forward bending. Interexaminer biases were found in all angles of trunk forward bending.
Conclusion: In the measurement of lumbar motion angle in the sagittal plane using a small accelerometer, it was necessary to repeat measurements 2 to 4 times, because a single measurement was not sufficiently reliable either within or between examiners.
© 2022 by National University of Health Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar Vertebrae; Range of Motion, Articular; Reproducibility of Results; Spine

Year:  2022        PMID: 35747614      PMCID: PMC9209814          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  26 in total

Review 1.  Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.557

2.  The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis.

Authors:  M M Panjabi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12

3.  The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement.

Authors:  M M Panjabi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12

4.  Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Sara P Gombatto; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Lumbopelvic rhythm during forward and backward sagittal trunk rotations: combined in vivo measurement with inertial tracking device and biomechanical modeling.

Authors:  A Tafazzol; N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Reliability and validity of an iPhone(®) application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi; Morteza Taghipour; Elham Jannati; Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei; Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani; Fatemeh Rajabzadeh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes.

Authors:  Shirley Sahrmann; Daniel C Azevedo; Linda Van Dillen
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Movement Control Impairment and Low Back Pain: State of the Art of Diagnostic Framing.

Authors:  Soleika Salvioli; Andrea Pozzi; Marco Testa
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  How consistent are lordosis, range of movement and lumbo-pelvic rhythm in people with and without back pain?

Authors:  Robert A Laird; Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Enrica Papi; Woon Senn Koh; Alison H McGregor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.